Case law

Thielke v. Albee

79 Or. 48 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1915

In the case of Biggs v. McBride, 17 Or. 640 ( 21 Pac. 878 , 5 L. R. … In the case of Nolen v. Riechman (D.

Ramsey v. Ogden

23 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1893

In French v. Pearce, 8 Conn. 445 ( 21 Am. … And it is said that “it cannot be denied that this doctrine is in accordance with the strict letter of the statute, and it may be equally within its spirit and intent. ” The case is different where, as in Brown v.

Oregon Broadcasting Co. v. Department of Revenue

287 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1979

As made clear in Bend Millwork v. … In Sabin v.

Hazard v. Salles

222 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1960

Meyers v. Dillon, 39 Or 581 , 65 P 867 , 66 P 814 ; Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co., 78 Or 355 , 153 P 470 ; Tycer v. … Wicktorwitz v. Farmers Ins. Co., 31 Or 569 , 51 P 75 ; Alden v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co., 46 Or 593 , 81 P 385 ; Fredenthal v.

Clawson v. Anderson

248 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1967

Finerty v. … Bell Oil & Gas Co. v. Brown et al, 104 Okla 11, 230 P 244 (1924). Cf., Matlock v. Babb, 31 Or 516 , 49 P 873 (1897). Usually the burden is imposed upon the creditor to show an excess is available. First Nat.

Scott v. Elliott

253 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1969

Fry et al v. Woodward et ux, 221 Or 39 , 350 P2d 183 (1960) ; Reeves et al v. Porta, 173 Or 147 , 144 P2d 493 (1944); Laurance et al v. Tucker, 160 Or 474 , 85 P2d 374 (1939). … Co. v. Lemons et al, 206 Or 140 , 289 P2d 684 , 291 P2d 733 (1955); Laurance et al v. Tucker, supra; Coquille Mill & Mercantile Co. v. Johnson, 52 Or 547 , 98 P 132 (1908).

Jacobberger v. School Dist. No. 1

114 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1925

"V. … There is no allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff's claim herein was ever presented to the school board for audit, and such presentation has been distinctly held to be necessary: Barrow v. School Dist.

Cooke v. City of Portland

136 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1931

Also see Lockwood v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Scholl v. Belcher

63 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1912

Hopwood v. Patterson, 2 Or. 49 ; Fiore v. Ladd, 29 Or. 528 ( 46 Pac. 144 ) ; Morgan’s Estate, 46 Or. 233 ( 77 Pac. 608 : 78 Pac. 1029 ) ; Rafferty v. Davis, 54 Or. 77 ( 102 Pac. 305 ) ; Wilson v. … Brown, 150 Mass. 479 ( 23 N. E. 233 ) ; Walker v. Midland Ry. Co., 55 L. T. R. (N. S.) 489. The same effect was given to like conduct of sober persons in the cases of Watson v. Manitou Ry.

Dimmick v. Rosenfeld

34 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

Many cases could be cited in support of this rule, but the following are deemed sufficient for present purposes: Black, Judgm. § 420; 2 Freeman, Judgm. § 373; Brown v. Pierce, 74 U. S. (7 Wall.) 205 ; Atkinson v. … Creighton, 10 Or. 42 ; Rhodes v. McCarry, 19 Or. 222 ( 23 Pac. 971 ); Meier v. Hess, 23 Or. 599 ( 32 Pac. 755 ).

State v. Turnidge

359 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 2016

Id. at 407; see also State v. … Id. at 164 (citing Barclay v.

Rayburn v. Hurd

20 Or. 229 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1891

(Burgess v. Tucker, 5 Johnson, 104 .) … (Avery v. Brown, 31 Conn. 401 .) The accounts held by the defendants were mature for collection on their *233 part and complete as matters of set-off as the cause of action upon the note.

Phillipsen v. Hunt

129 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1929

As stated in Sweeney v. Erving, 228 U. S. 233 ( 57 L. Ed. 815 , 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 416, Ann. Cas. 1914D, 905), and quoted with approval in Gillilan v. … Bean, Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

White v. Oregon Realty Exchange Investment Co.

114 Or. 636 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1925

Justice Band, speaking for the court, in Castleman v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Ogden

123 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1927

In support of the above rule also see: House v. Jackson, 24 Or. 89 ( 32 Pac. 1027 ); Bogard v. Barhan, 52 Or. 121 ( 96 Pac. 673 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 676 ); Dennis v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Reter v. Talent Irrigation District

258 Or. 140 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1971

Defendant contends that under Martin v. … See Note by William Hallmark, Strict Liability — Irrigation Districts and Rylands v. Fletcher in Oregon, 46 Or L Rev 239 (1967). A broader rule appears to have been applied in Brown v.

In Re Waters of Chewaucan River

89 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1918

In Moody v. … This was approved in Osborn v.

Rice v. Douglas County

93 Or. 551 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1919

It is true that the court, in Minard v. Douglas County, 9 Or. 206 , and in King v. … Birch, 12 Conn. 142 ; Dollarhide v. Board of Commissioners of Muscatine Co., 1 Greene (Iowa), 158.

Post v. OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY

268 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1974

New York Times v. Sullivan, supra, as extended by Rosenbloom v. … THIS AIRCRAFT WAS RENTED FROM HILLSBORO AVIATION, HILLSBORO, OREGON BY JAMES STEED, WMA, DOB JULY 1935, 6 FT, 185 POUNDS, BROWN, BROWN ADDRESS 11432 41 ST ST, DRIVE, N.E.

Garrow v. Pennsylvania General Insurance

288 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1979

Peterson v. State Farm Ins. Co., 238 Or 106 , 393 P2d 651 (1964). … Also see Allen v.