Case law

Wallulis v. Dymowski

323 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1996

, when that Board is sitting in its quasi-judicial function as a licensing body, are absolutely privileged); Ramstead v. … It also is an unfair labor practice for an employer “to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization.” 29 USC § 158 (a)(2); see Labor Board v.

Campbell's Gas Burner Co. v. Hammer

78 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1915

A. 155); Belle v. Brown, 37 Or. 588 ( 61 Pac. 1024 ); White *618 v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 ( 68 Pac. 739 , 93 Am. St. Rep. 732 ); Ruckman v. Union Ry. Co., 45 Or. 578 ( 78 Pac. 748 , 69 L. R. A. 480); Yuen Suey v. … Cooper, 6 Or. 181 ; Starr v. Stark, 7 Or. 500 ; Spaur v. McBee, 19 Or. 76 ( 23 Pac. 818 ); McMahan v. Whelan, 44 Or. 402 ( 75 Pac. 715 ); Fire Association v. Allesina, 45 Or. 154 ( 77 Pac. 123 ); Clark v.

State v. Snider

296 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

In State v. … As stated by Judge Poole in the recent opinion of United States v. Brown, 720 F2d 1059, 1072 (9th Cir 1983), “the commitment-to-the-truth stood not alone, but in the guardian presence of detection by polygraph.”

Phipps v. Stancliff

118 Or. 32 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1926

In Todd v. Weed, 84 Minn. 4 , 86 N. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Maupin Warehouse Co. v. Fleming

121 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1927

*534 BROWN, J. … To similar effect are Thompson v. Peck, 115 Ind. 512 ( 18 N. E. 16 , 1 L. R. A. 201); Coffin v. Hollister, 27 N. Y. St. Rep. 637 (7 N. Y. Supp. *537 734); Kelsey v. Harrison, 29 Kan. 143 ; Ayers v.

State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Woodruff

179 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1946

fluid milk and cream for human consumption and no more, and by reason thereof there became due and owing as license fees the sum of $968.87, which fees defendants have paid to plaintiff and his predecessor, the Milk Control Board … "V.

Stark v. State Industrial Accident Commission

103 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1922

Co. v. Industrial Acc. Board, 52 Mont. 6 ( 155 Pac. 268 , L. R. A. 1916D, 628). In Peet v. Mills, 76 Wash. 437, 439 ( 136 Pac. 685 , Ann. Cas. 1915D, 154, L. R. A. *93 1916A, 358, Workmen’s Compensation Acts, C. J. … J., and Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Kelly v. Weaver

77 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1915

Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); First Nat. Bank v. Fire Assn., 33 Or. 172 ( 50 Pac. 568 , 53 Pac. 8 ); State v. Barrett, 33 Or. 194 ( 54 Pac. 807 ); Weiss v. Kohlhagen, 58 Or. 144 ( 113 Pac. 46 ); Kitchin v. … Consonant with this recognized departure from the general rule, it was held in Dugan v. Arthurs, 230 Pa. 299 ( 79 Atl. 626 , 34 L. R. A. (N.

Anderson v. Oregon City Hospital Co.

214 Or. 212 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1958

Briggs v. John Yeon Co., 168 Or 239 , 122 P2d 444. … . *217 We believe this case to be governed by Vinson v. Brown, 193 Or 113 , 237 P2d 501 . And, as therein stated: “We deem it unnecessary to review herein the several citations contained in plaintiff’s brief.”

Livingston v. KROGER/DEVLIN

347 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2009

In McCormick v. … Caruthers v. Myers, 344 Or 596, 600 , 189 P3d 1 (2008). As noted above, we review the ballot title to determine if its component parts substantially comply with ORS 250.035.

Officer v. Cummings

127 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1928

Paris (Idaho), 267 Pac. 232 ; Gaulden v. Ramsey, 123 Miss. 1 ( 85 South. 109 ); Carter v. Carter, 36 Mich. 207 ; Gulbranson v. Thompson, 63 Utah, 115 ( 222 Pac. 590 ); Sibley v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Gentner v. Kern

164 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1940

Boire v. Yamhill County, 53 Or. 36 , 98 P. 520 . They also contend that if the proceedings were valid the road never became anything more than a paper road; that is, that no use whatever was made of it. … As stated in Hyde v. Peirce, 147 Or. 5 , 31 P. (2d) 755 , that method of indication imparts no knowledge to this court when it examines the record.

McDowell v. Parry

45 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1904

Brown, as sheriff, in pursuance thereof, levied on the six lots, and advertised them for sale, whereupon this suit was commenced, resulting in a decree as hereinbefore stated. … Justice Thayer in Schneider v. Sears, 13 Or. 69 ( 8 Pac. 841 ), “are statutory, and, unless the statute is strictly pursued, no right is acquired under them.”

Bird v. Ellingsworth

156 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1937

Brown v. Kingsley, 38 Iowa 220 ; Hodges v. Bales, 102 Ind. 494 ; Rees v. Cupp, 59 Ind. 566 .” This rule of pleading was approved in Williams v. Williams, 20 Colo. 51 ( 37 P. 614 ). In the case of Warnock v. … The case of Sheard v.

Eli Bridge Co. v. Dave Lachman

124 Or. 592 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1928

S.) 940); Knowles Loom Works v. Vacher, 57 N. J. Law, 490 ( 31 Atl. 306 , 33 L. R. A. 305); Beggs v. Bartels, 73 Conn. 132 ( 46 Atl. 874 , 84 Am. St. Rep. 152 ); Hervey v. R. I. *597 Locomotive Works, 93 U. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Patterson v. Ashland

95 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1920

Corp., § 676 et seq.; State ex rel. v. Commrs. Putnam County, 23 Fla. 632 ( 3 South. 164 ). … Neil, 64 Or. 104 ( 128 Pac. 433 ); Cole v. Seaside, 80 Or. 73 ( 156 Pac. 569 ). 3.

In Re Irwin

162 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1939

But these two documents. also served as the supplemental abstract and respondents’ brief in the companion case of George v. Oregon etc., Ry. … Moses v. Bagley (1875), 55 Ga. 283 ; Reynolds v. Sorosis Fruit Co. (1901), 133 Cal. 625 , *236 66 Pac. 21 ; Gabrielson v. Gorin (1916), 92 Wash. 408 , 159 Pac. 387 .”

Miller v. Medford National Bank

115 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1925

Baber v. Caples, supra. … J., and Burnett and Brown, JJ., concur.

Dabney v. City of Portland

124 Or. 54 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1928

Harrisburg, 42 Or. 494 ( 71 Pac. 605 ); Oliver v. Synhorst, 48 Or. 292 ( 86 Pac. 376 , 7 L. R. A. (N. S.) 243); Cruson v. City of Lebanon, 64 Or. 593 (131 Pac. 316); Booth v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Weston

102 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1921

L.; State v. Dodson, 4 Or. 64 ; State v. Spencer, 6 Or. 152 ; State v. Brown, 7 Or. 186 ; State v. Lee Yan Yan, 10 Or. 365 ; State v. Farnam, 82 Or. 211, 224 ( 161 Pac. 417 , Ann. Cas. 1918A, 318). … Glass, 5 Or. 73 ; State v. Anderson, 10 Or. 448 ; State v. Ching Ling, 16 Or. 419 ( 18 Pac. 844 ); State v. Henderson, 24 Or. 100 ( 32 Pac. 1030 ); State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); State v.