Case law

McIntosh v. Clarke

131 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1929

“V. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent. Bossman, J., dissenting.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hubert

265 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1973

The Board of Governors found the accused not guilty of the charge and recommended that the complaint be dismissed. We agree with the trial committee’s finding that the accused was guilty of unprofessional conduct. … Brant, 242 Or 562 , 410 P2d 824 (1966); State ex rel Joseph v. Mannix, 133 Or 329 , 288 P 507 , rehearing denied 290 P 745 (1930).

Reynolds v. State Industrial Accident Commission

141 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1932

Citing section 49-1817, Oregon Code 1930; Vient v. State Industrial Accident Com mission, 123 Or. 334 ( 262 P. 250 ), and several other cases. … Brown, Campbell and Rossman, JJ., concur.

American Building Maintenance v. McLees

296 Or. 772 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1984

In Cain v. State Ind. Acc. Comm., 149 Or 29 , 37 P2d 353 (1934) and Green v. State Ind. Acc. … In Nesselrodt v.

Bank of California v. Young

123 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1927

BROWN, J. A draft such as the one drawn by the defendant in this case is a negotiable instrument. It is made so by the negotiable instrument statute of Oregon: Or. L., §7793. … Rep. 243); Brusegaard v. Ueland, 72 Minn. 283 ( 75 N. W. 228 ); National Bank of Commerce v. Bossemeyer, 101 Neb. 96, 102 ( 162 N. W. 503 , L. R. A. 1917E, 374); Walker & Brock v.

Nedry v. Herold

141 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1932

In Schmid v. … BEAN, C.J., BROWN, RAND, CAMPBELL and KELLY, JJ., concur. BELT, J., absent. *Page 172

John L. Jersey & Son, Inc. v. Bud Bailey Construction Co.

262 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1972

Brown v. Farrell, 258 Or 348, 358 , 483 P2d 453 (1971).

State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Woodruff

179 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1946

fluid milk and cream for human consumption and no more, and by reason thereof there became due and owing as license fees the sum of $968.87, which fees defendants have paid to plaintiff and his predecessor, the Milk Control Board … "V.

State v. Reyes-Camarena

330 Or. 431 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 2000

ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347,355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381 , 823 P2d 956 (1991). … V.

Hague v. Hague

134 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1930

(See Hague v. Hague, 79 Or. 646 ( 156 P. 277 ).) After the decree of divorce was set aside plaintiff and T. 0. Hague lived separately, but he was permitted to reside on the land in controversy. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Creditors Protective Ass'n v. Balcom

248 Or. 38 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1967

Sabin v. Anderson, supra. … In Sabin v.

Taylor v. Employment Division

286 Or. 711 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1979

See Baker v. Cameron, supra; Republic Dev. Co., Inc. v. Emp. Div., supra. … Co. v. S. U. C.

Loder Bros. v. Lodge 1506 International Ass'n of MacHinists

209 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1957

International Union Auto Workers v. Wis. Board, 336 US 245, 253 , 93 L ed 651, 69 S Ct 516 ; Allen-Bradley Local v. Board, 315 US 740, 748 , 86 L ed 1154, 62 S Ct 820 ; Garner v. … Wallace v. International Association of Mechanics, 155 Or 652, 663 , 63 P2d 1090 . See Peters v. Central Labor Council, 179 Or 1, 9 , 169 P2d 870 .

Nikkila v. Niemi

248 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1967

In Nielsen v. … Brown, 232 Or 426, 446 , 374 P2d 896, 905 (1962), we quoted from Restatement of Torts the rule applicable to a child as follows: “ ‘If the actor is a child, the standard of conduct to which he must conform to avoid being

Reckard v. Ryan

133 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1930

As stated in Hart v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Livingston v. KROGER/DEVLIN

347 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 2009

In McCormick v. … Caruthers v. Myers, 344 Or 596, 600 , 189 P3d 1 (2008). As noted above, we review the ballot title to determine if its component parts substantially comply with ORS 250.035.

Elston v. WAGNER

216 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1959

Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co., 49 Or 204, 206 , 89 P 389 . See also Brown v. Jones, 137 Or 520, 522-4 , 3 P2d 768 , for reasons; Brindle v. McCormick Lbr. & Mfg. … Hon v. Moore Timber Products, Inc., this day decided.

Hoover v. King

65 L.R.A. 790 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1903

. § 703; Amory v. Armory, 26 Wis. 152 ; Granger v. Singleton, 32 La. Ann. 898 . … It is not the recovery by the defendants that constitutes the bar or estoppel, but the decision upon the merits of the question which is in dispute between the parties : Dawley v. Brown, 79 N. Y. 390 ; King v.

Thielke v. Albee

79 Or. 48 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1915

In the case of Biggs v. McBride, 17 Or. 640 ( 21 Pac. 878 , 5 L. R. … In the case of Nolen v. Riechman (D.

Miller v. Portland

78 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1915

Co. v. … In State v. Jersey City, 58 N. J.