Case law

Sherman v. Department of Revenue

335 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 2003

Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 US 356, 367 , 121 S Ct 955 , 148 L Ed 2d 866 (2001). … In Hughes v.

Dawson v. Coffey

12 Or. 513 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1885

(Smith v. R. R. Co. 99 U. S. 401 . And see Baxter v. Moses, 77 Me. 465 .) So in Parish v. Lewis, Freem. Ch. … (Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 4 Johns. Ch. 671, 687 ; McElwain v. Willis, 9 Wend. 548 ; Scriver v. Bostwick, 2 McCord Ch. 416 ; Hadden v. Spader, 20 Johns. 554 ; Moore v. Young, 1 Dana, 516 .) Hodges v.

State v. Hanna

224 Or. 588 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1960

State v. Johnston, 143 Or 395, 399, 402 , 22 P2d 879 ; State v. Coleman, 119 Or 430, 435 , 249 P 1049 ; State v. Browning, 47 Or 470 , 82 P 955 ; State v. Marco, 32 Or 175 , 50 P 799 . … State v. Johnston, supra, State v. Coleman, supra, State v. Browning, supra, and State v.

Chenoweth v. Southern Pac. Co.

53 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1909

In such a case it was also said in Brown v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., 13 Mo. App. 462 , that the jury are entitled to take into consideration the physical facts of the case. … Thompson, Negligence, § 2234, very severely criticises the authorities that hold to the contrary, and at section 2289 approves the language quoted above from Sappington V. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co., and Brown v.

Steiner v. Polk County

40 Or. 124 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901

The county court thereafter allowed and paid bills for Jackson’s care, board, and hospital charges, but upon the presentation of plaintiff’s claim “for professional services rendered Elroy Jackson, in the sum of $125,” after … Cor. (4 ed.) § 463; Murphy v. City of Albina, 22 Or. 106 ( 29 Pac. 353 , 29 Am. St. Rep. 578 ); People v. Swift, 31 Cal. 26 ; Boydston v. Rockwall Co. 86 Tex. 234 ( 24 S. W. 272 ).

Gilbertson v. Culinary Alliance & Bartenders' Union

204 Or. 326 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1955

In Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … And again in National Labor Relations Board v.

Rashford Lumber Co. v. Dolan

122 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 22, 1927

Rep. 811); Berlin & Lepori v. Mattison, supra; Major Creek Lum. Co. v. Johnson, 99 Or. 172 ( 195 Pac. 177 ); Deardorf v. Idaho Nat. Harvester Co., 90 Or. 425 ( 177 Pac. 33 ); Endicott, Johnson & Co. v. … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

Brenne v. Hecox

129 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1929

*213 BROWN, J. The first assignment of error relates to the right of the defendant to have an inspection and physical examination of the body of the plaintiff. … For a forceful discussion of this question, see the case of State v. Gates, 104 Or. 112 ( 206 Pac. 863 ). Because of the erroneous instruction hereinbefore set out, this case is reversed and remanded.

Ball v. Pioneer Trust Co.

175 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1944

Lambert, 103 Or. 423 , 205 P. 995 ; Franklin v. Northrup, 107 Or. 537 , 215 P. 494 ; Officer v. Cummings, 127 Or. 320 , 272 P. 273 . At the time of Miss McKinney’s death, March 10, 1934, Mrs. … A.; Branch v. Lambert, supra; Blaskower v. Steel, 23 Or. 106 , 31 P. 252 . Mrs.

Krebs Hop Co. v. Taylor

52 Or. 627 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1908

The word' “team,” as employed in a statute exempting certain property from execution, has been held to mean one or more horses with their harness and the vehicle to which they are customarily attached for use: Brown v. … Supp. 799 ) ; Lamotte v. Wisner, 51 Md. 543 ; Peterson v. Lodwick, 44 Neb. 771 ( 62 N. W. 1100 ).

Tuel v. Gladden

234 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1963

He could have been paroled at any time the Board of Parole determined him to be fit for parole. … State v. Hicks, supra, and State v. Smith, 128 Or 515, 525-526 , 273 P 323 , specifically held to the contrary. State v.

City of Gearhart v. Gearhart Park Co.

132 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1930

On the authority of Lovejoy v. Portland, 95 Or. 459 ( 188 P. 207 ), this general statute controls and, by *500 implication, repeals the charter provision above set forth. … J.,, and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division

312 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1992

The order of the Employment Appeals Board is reversed. … The case is remanded to the Employment Appeals Board. 1 The Court of Appeals’ opinion states, incorrectly, that claimant had the option of leaving her retirement funds with her employer. McKean-Coffman v.

Clark v. City of Portland

62 Or. 124 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1912

Great reliance is put in the case of Shannahan v. … In addition to State v. Board of Park Commissioners, 33 Minn. 524 ( 24 N. W. 187 ), cited by plaintiff, the case of Stipp v. Claman, 123 Ind. 532 ( 24 N. E. 131 ), is instructive on this point.

Brady v. Schnitzer

135 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1931

The above instruction is identical with that approved in Hinckley v. Marsh et al., 124 Or. 1 ( 263 P. 886 ). … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Vinson v. Vinson

111 Or. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 27, 1924

BROWN, J. From a careful perusal of the record, we are convinced that it warrants the court’s findings. … Smith, 8 Or. 100 ; McMahan v. McMahan, 9 Or. 525 ; Eggerth v. Eggerth, 15 Or. 626 ( 16 Pac. 650 ); Herberger v. Herberger, 16 Or. 327 ( 14 Pac. 70 ); Hawley v. Hawley, 101 Or. 649 ( 199 Pac. 589 ).

Interior Warehouse Co. v. Dunn

80 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1916

To admit proof of such a custom would be to contradict the plain stipulations of the writing: Holmes v. Whitaker, 23 Or. 319, 323 ( 31 Pac. 705 ); Willis v. Lance, 28 Or. 371, 374 ( 43 Pac. 384 , 487); Barnard v. … Co., 41 Or. 135 ( 68 Pac. 397 ); Brown v. Feldwert, 46 Or. 363 ( 80 Pac. 414 ). This, however, may be a matter of phraseology, and possibly under certain circumstances might be corrected by amendment.

Masters v. Walker

99 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1921

J., p. 684, § 262; Howell v. Johnson, 38 Or. 571, 575 ( 64 Pac. 659 ); Carlon v. First Nat. Bank, 80 Or. 539, 548 ( 157 Pac. 809 ). 7. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Barber

343 Or. 525 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2007

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376, 381-82 , 823 P2d 956 (1991).” *529 Barber, 209 Or App at 266 .

Bratzel v. Stafford

140 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1932

Co. v. … Wagner v. Shaw, 6 Alaska 647 .