Case law

Lorentzen v. State Compensation Department

251 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1968

Defendants’ first contention relating to the scope of judicial review is disposed of by Coday v. Willamette Tug & Barge Co., recently decided, 250 Or 39 , 440 P2d 224 (1968). … There we held that under ORS 656.298(6) the trial court and this court are charged with the duty of maldng a de novo review of the record forwarded by the Board.

First Nat. Bk. v. Multnomah Lbr. Box Co.

125 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1928

Brown , 7 Or. 285 ; Crown Co. v. Cohn , 88 Or. 642 ( 172 P. 804 ); 5 C.J. 1218, §§ 332, 333; 2 Perry on Trusts (6 ed.), 1264, 1269, §§ 764-766. … See also extended notes to First Baptist Church v. American Board of Commissioners , Ann. Cas. 1916D, 404, said note beginning in page 410.)" 28 Ency. of Law (2 ed.), 1002, paragraph (C); Robinson v.

Lind v. Boulin

97 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1920

extent conflicting and uncertain, but it appears from the defendant’s answer that he claims title in himself, and the right of possession, a situation which relieves the plaintiff from the necessity of proving a demand: Brown … v.

Wagonblast v. Whitney

12 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1885

(Brown v. Brawn, 47 Mich. 384 .) These are salutaiy but stringent rules, in the observance of which the interests of society and the public welfare are involved. … (Brown v. Lord, 7 Oreg. 306 ; Odell v. Morin, 5 Oreg. 98 ; Wright v. Pucket, 22 Gratt. 370 ; Parkhurst v. Van Cortlandt, 1 Johns. Ch. 278 ; Semmes v Worthington, 38 Md. 298 ; Horn v. Ludington, 32 Wis. 73 ; Wat. Spec.

Bryant v. Panter

91 Or. 686 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1919

Blanchard, 15 Mich. 292 ; Boyce v. Murphy, 91 Ind. 1 ( 46 Am. Rep. 567 ); Hetfield v. Dow, 27 N. J. Law, 440, 445; Eddy v. Davidson, 42 Vt. 56, 60 ; East Baltimore Lumber Co. v. … Cas. 841, 62 Atl. 576 ); Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 ed.), §197; 1 Brandt on Suretyship (3 ed.), § 808; 29 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2 ed.), 924.

Ebbert v. First Nat. Bank of Condon

131 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1929

The following two cases are illustrative: Brown v. City of Silverton, 97 Or. 441 ( 190 P. 971 ), The Borrowdale, 39 Fed. 376 ; the general rule is stated and applied in I Cooley’s Const. Limitations, 8 ed., p.315. … We quote the following from Brown v. Quincy O. & K. C. Ry. Co., 198 Mo.

Tulloch v. Cockrum

115 Or. 601 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1925

It may be added, however, that knowledge is not equivalent to statutory notice: Wright v. City of McMinn *608 ville, 59 Or. 397 ( 117 Pac. 298 ); Bitting v. Douglas Co., 24 Or. 406 ( 33 Pac. 981 ). … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. Benson

61 Or. 359 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1912

City of Oakland v. … Brown v. Warren, 16 Nev. 228 . “And all other lands, tenements and hereditaments belonging to the said William, Earl of Sterling, within the province of New York.” Jackson v. De Lancey, 11 Johns. 365 .

Ter Har v. Backus

256 Or. 288 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1970

Reed v. Real Detective Pub. Co., 63 Ariz 294, 162 P2d 133 (1945); All-red v. National Old Line Ins. Co., 245 Ark 893 , 435 SW2d 104 (1968); Hunt v. Tague, 205 Md 369, 109 A2d 80 (Md App 1954); Brown v. … In Steenson v.

State v. Trueax

315 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1993

State v. … See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (articulating standards that appellate courts apply under ORAP 5.45(2)); see also State v. Jensen, 313 Or 587, 598 , 837 P2d 525 (1992) (same); Ailes v.

Joplin v. National Live Stock Ins.

61 Or. 544 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1912

L., it was the duty of plaintiffs to have immediately notified the State Board of Health or the State Veterinarian of the fact that the horse was infected with an incurable contagious disease, and it would have been the duty … Tripp v. Northwestern Live Stock Ins. Co., 91 Iowa 281 ( 59 N. W. 1 ). 2.

Blair v. McCool

136 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1931

Co. v. Brown, 69 S. W. 651 ; Smith v. Great Northern R. R. Co., 139 Minn. 343 ( 166 N. W. 350 ); Yeager v. St. Joseph Lead Co., 12 S. W. (2d) 520 ; International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Shufford, 36 Tex. Civ. … Francis v. Brooks, 24 Ohio App. 136 ( 156 N. E. 609 ), is a case against a dentist for malpractice and not founded on fraud. The petition for a rehearing is denied. Bean, C. J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Feagins v. Wallowa County

62 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1912

Woodruff v. County of Douglas, 17 Or. 314 ( 21 Pac. 49 ) ; Sime v. Spencer, 30 Or. 340 ( 47 Pac. 919 ), and *190 French Co. v. … It is said in Klein v. Southern Pac. Co. (C.

Miller v. Safeway Stores

219 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1959

Brown v. … Co. v.

State v. Thomas

311 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1991

v. … State v. Spada, 286 Or 305, 309 , 594 P2d 815 (1979); compare Zollinger v.

Glaser v. Haskin

140 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1932

In Boyes v. Ramsden, 34 Or. 253 ( 55 P. 538 ), it was held that “an agreement to modify a prior agreement must be established by clear and satisfactory evidence.” See, also, Watson v. Janion, 6 Or. 137 . … Smith v. Mills, 112 Or. 496 ( 230 P. 350 ).

State v. Wilder

98 Or. 130 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1920

Scott, 63 Or. 444 ( 128 Pac. 441 ); State v. McPherson, 70 Or. 371 ( 141 Pac. 1018 ). … Brown, J., not sitting.

Comer v. World Insurance Co.

212 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1957

Merle Brown, in Salem, one of the two physicians whom we have mentioned. Dr. … Brown administered, during five office calls, treatment for anxiety, to which the patient did not satisfactorily respond. April 16, Dr. Brown referred Comer to Dr. Paul Wolfe, a neurologist.

Thompson v. IDS Life Insurance Company

274 Or. 649 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1976

State v. Popiel, 216 Or 140, 145 , 337 P2d 303 (1959). * * *” Kankkonen v. Hendrickson et al, 232 Or 49, 67 , 374 P2d 393 , 99 ALR2d 296 (1962). See, also, Clarkston v. … State Highway Com. v. Rawson, supra, 210 Or at 619-620 . The court held that the authority of the State Land Board did not extend to execution of mining leases on lands held by the Highway Commission.

Barger v. Barger

30 Or. 268 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1897

Eq. 561; Olcott v. Bynum, *276 84 U. S. (17 Wall.) 59 ; Baker v. Vining, 30 Me. 127 ( 1 Am. Dec. 617 ); Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 86. … It cannot be said that the cestui que trust is the equitable owner of the new form of property: Cutler v. Tuttle, 19 N. J. Eq. 561; Ferris v. Van Vechten, 73 N. Y. 120 ; and Browne on the Statute of Frauds, § 86.