Case law

Trunnell v. Tonole

104 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1922

The doctrine that foreclosure and sale destroy the mortgage is taught in Flanders v. Aumack, 32 Or. 19 ( 51 Pac. 447 ); Williams v. Wilson, 42 Or. 299 ( 70 Pac. 1031 ); Higgs v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

State v. Shumway

291 Or. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1981

Although current attitudes are no longer as sanguine about the official ability to cure persons afflicted with criminal minds, see Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … In Woodson v.

Ducosin v. Mott

292 Or. 764 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1982

We used the same reasoning in Moore v. … Ramstead v. Morgan, supra, 219 Or at 387 . We relied upon the same principle in Moore v. Westlawn Mem’l Park, supra, 266 Or at 249 .

Souza v. Jackson County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

256 Or. 220 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1970

Zeleny v. Karnosh, 224 Or 419 , 356 P2d 426 (1960). … Karn v. Pidcock, 225 Or 406 , 357 P2d 509 (1960); Brown v. Hassenstab, 212 Or 246 , 319 P2d 929 (1957); Sharkey v. Burlingame Co., 131 Or 185 , 282 P 546 (1929).

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.

261 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1971

A majority of the Wisconsin court in Shaw v. … Brown v. Bonesteele, 218 Or 312, 335 , 344 P2d 928 (1959); Skultety v. Humphreys, 247 Or 450, 458 , 431 P2d 278 (1967). In Brown v.

Trites v. Abbott

125 Or. 362 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1928

BROWN, J. The plaintiff, Robena Trites, is the administratrix of the estate of her mother, Maggie May Murphy, deceased. Defendant Mary G. Abbott is likewise a daughter of decedent and is the wife of her co-defendant, A. … . *365 Again in Wilson v.

Sylvis v. Hays

138 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1932

*422 BROWN, J. … In Peerless Pacific Co. v.

Catterlin v. Bush

39 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1901

Mere formal or nonessential terms will be implied, but the elements necessary to a completed contract must be intelligently expressed; though ever so briefly: Browne, Stat. Frauds (4 ed.), § 371; Scarritt v. St. … Rep. 541 ); Sherburne v. Shaw, 1 N. H. 157 ( 8 Am. Dec. 47 ); Gault v. Stormont, 51 Mich. 636 ( 17 N. W. 214 ); Clampet v. Bells, 39 Minn. 272 ( 39 N. W. 495 ); Williams v. Morris, 95 U. S. 444 ; Elliot v.

State v. Jesse

360 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 2016

In State v. … State v.

City of Eugene v. Garrett

87 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

S.) 243); Schooling v. Harrisburg, 42 Or. 494 ( 71 Pac. 605 ); Oliver v. Synhorst, 58 Or. 582 ( 109 Pac. 762 , 115 Pac. 594 ); Crusen v. Lebanon, 64 Or. 593 ( 131 Pac. 316 ), and Portland v. … C. was conveyed to the Board of Begents of the University of Oregon, for University purposes.

Dearmond v. Fenwick

127 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1928

As stated in Brawley v. United States, 96 U. S. 168 ( 24 L. Ed. 622 ), and quoted with approval in Stanfield v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur. ■

State v. Lee

110 Or. 682 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1924

BROWN, J. Amos R. Lee was arraigned in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Oregon, on the tenth day of November, 1921, upon an indictment accusing him of the crime of nonsupport. … In Kibler v. Commonwealth, 94 Va. 804 ( 26 S.

Pitts v. Crane

114 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1925

Baker, 43 Or. 236 ( 72 Pac. 744 ); Simon v. Trummer, 57 Or. 153, 159 ( 110 Pac. 786 ); Devlin v. Moore, 64 Or. 433, 441 ( 130 Pac. 35 ); Blaser v. Fleck, 96 Or. 187 ( 189 Pac. 637 ). … Pitts’ and ber board. That is, tbe kind of work sbe bad to do.” Tbe court sustained a motion to strike, on tbe ground that tbe answer was not responsive to tbe question.

State v. Dobson

116 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1925

See State v. Carmody, 50 Or. 1 ( 91 Pac. 446 , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 828); State v. Sommer, 71 Or. 206 ( 142 Pac. 759 ); City of Astoria v. Malone, 87 Or. 88 ( 169 Pac. 749 ), and cases there cited; State v. … J., and Brown and Bean, JJ., concur.

Meier v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.

51 Or. 69 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1908

Plaintiff found there a pointed fragment of a board about four feet long, two feet of which was covered with blood, and which it was said pierced the horse, causing its death. … Plaintiff swears that in Butler’s presence he fitted this piece of board into the fence from where it had apparently been broken.

Coos County v. State

303 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1987

Accord Ostrander v. Bell, 199 App Div 304 , 192 NYS 262 , 267 aff’d 234 NY 566 , 138 NE 449 (1922); Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education, 266 NC 761, 147 SE2d 381, 385 (1966); State v. … Because the state is not bound by the presumption of satisfaction prescribed by ORS 88.110, State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or 431 , 165 P 372 (1917), it is free to seek satisfaction of its lien.

Hertzen v. Hertzen

104 Or. 423 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1922

BROWN, J. It is a well-established principle that, as between tribunals of concurrent jurisdiction, the one which first takes cognizance of a controversy can continue it to the end. … In McKissick v. McKissick, 93 Or. 644, 649 ( 174 Pac. 721 , 184 Pac. 272 ), the court quotes with approval from Gibbons v.

Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.

336 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2004

In Frasure v. … Plumbers and Steamfitters Local 343, 94 F3d 597 (9th Cir 1996) (state workers’ compensation appeals board approved parties’ settlement of workers’ compensation claim); Niles-Robinson v.

McCargar & McKay v. Federal Securities Co.

134 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1930

The defense should have been made by a special plea setting up the facts: Overholt v. Dietz, 43 Or. 194 ( 72 P. 695 ). … Rossman and Brown, JJ., not sitting.

Roseburg Forest Products Co. v. Employment Division

313 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1992

The Employment Appeals Board (EAB) awarded unemployment compensation benefits. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Roseburg Forest Products Co. v. Employment Div., 104 Or App 448 , 802 P2d 73 (1990). We affirm. … See, e.g., Labor Board v.