Case law

Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.

142 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1933

Cave v. Brown & McCabe, Stevedores, Inc., 128 Or. 286, 291 ( 274 P. 505 ); Wike v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co., 83 Or. 678, 682 ( 163 P. 825 ); St. Louis, S. W. Ry. Co. v. Gillenwater (Texas), 284 S. … It was held in Cave v. Brown & McCabe, Stevedores, Inc., supra, in effect, that, in an action under the Seamen’s Act of March 4, 1915, § 20, as amended by the Act of June 5, 1920, § 33, 46 U. S. C.

Vandusen v. Shively

22 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1892

(Goodman v. Myrick, 5 Or. 65 .) The location of this line is a question of fact to be ascertained from the evidence. … It is distinctly traceable on the ground, according to the •evidence, by the marks and blazes on the trees, and substantially agrees with the reputed claim line as evidenced by the fence between Brown & Stevens and the fence

State v. Bosch

139 Or. 150 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1932

Edmunson, 87 Or. 476 ( 171 P. 186 ); Duniway v. Hadley, 91 Or. 343 ( 178 P. 942 ); Bottig v. Polsky, 101 Or. 530 ( 201 P. 188 ); Veazie v. Columbia etc., 111 Or. 1 ( 224 P. 1094 ); Obermeier v. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Warren v. Crosby

24 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1893

v. … City of Lowell, 8 Metc. 172 ; Brown v. County Commissioners, 21 Pa. St. 42; State v. Fitzporter, 17 Mo. App. 273 ; Fosdick v. Village of Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 485 -6; Sedgwick, Statutory Law, 123.

Fulp v. Brashears

116 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1925

Brown, 49 Or. 423, 425 ( 90 Pac. 673 ); Fisher v. Kelly, 30 Or. 1 ( 46 Pac. 146 ); Guille v. Wong Fook, 13 Or. 577 ( 11 Pac. 277 ). This has been the settled law in this state for a long time. … Conde, 22 Or. 581 ( 30 Pac. 454 ); Mellott v. Downing, 39 Or. 218, 224 ( 64 Pac. 393 ); Moorhouse v. Donaca, 14 Or. 430 ( 13 Pac. 112 ).

State v. Wise

305 Or. 78 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1988

State v. … Brown, 301 Or 268 , 278 n 6, 721 P2d 1357 (1986), and State v.

Wilson v. City of Portland

87 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1917

Bean in Yamhill County v. … The rule has been applied to assessments similar to those of the case here involved, in Lapp v. Marshfield, 72 Or. 573 ( 144 Pac. 83 ). 3.

Frutiger v. Department of Revenue

270 Or. 821 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1974

At the same time plaintiff wife became secretary-treasurer of the corporation and a member of the board of directors. … The only Oregon case dealing with this subject is Briggs v. State Tax Commission, 2 OTR, 162 (1965).

Smith v. Cameron

123 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1927

Co. v. Stevinson, 164 Cal. 221 (128 *505 Pac. 924); Oritz v. Hansen, 35 Colo. 100 ( 83 Pac. 964 ); Neitzel v. Spokane International Ry. Co., 65 Wash. 100 ( 117 Pac. 864 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 522); Minnesota Canal etc. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Graf v. Wilson

62 Or. 476 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1912

The principle is announced in Ware v. Gowen, 65 Me. 534 , and in Miller v. Scoville, 35 Ill. … See, also, Cutter v. Perkins, 47 Me. 557 . *481 In Holbrook v. Waters, 19 Pick.

State v. Loyer

303 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

We reaffirmed, most recently in State v. Clevenger, 297 Or 234 , 683 P2d 1360 (1984), and State v. … ORS 138.050 (1945). 4 The statute interpreted in State v.

Heikkila v. Ewen Transfer Co.

135 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1930

The complaint is therefore fatally defective: Jenkins v. Carman Mfg. Co., supra; Delthony v. Standard Furniture Co., supra; Perry v. … Brown, Belt and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Hornefius v. Wilkinson

51 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1908

Krimbel, 29 Or. 76 ( 43 Pac. 865 ); Patterson v. Patterson, 40 Or. 560 ( 67 Pac. 664 ); Keene v. Eldriedge, 47 Or. 179 ( 82 Pac. 802 ); Madden v. Welch, 48 Or. 199 ( 86 Pac. 2 ); Bade v. … See, also, Crown Cycle Co. v. Brown, 39 Or. 285 ( 64 Pac. 451 ); Humbird v. Davis, 210 Pa. 311 ( 59 Atl. 1082 ); Hindmarch v. Hoffman, 127 Pa. 284 ( 18 Atl. 14 : 4 L. R. A. 368: 14 Am. St. Rep. 842 ). 4.

Hunt v. Ring

125 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1928

BROWN, J. Defendant bases his appeal upon the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for a directed verdict. … See Ferguson v. Ingle, 38 Or. 43 ( 62 Pac. 760 ). Again, in the case of Caldwell Banking & Trust Co. v.

Guinn v. Cupp

304 Or. 488 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1987

Brown, conducted a hearing pursuant to the “remand.” … Bush v.

Fretland v. Cantrall

78 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1915

Rep. 518 ); McFarlane v. McFarlane, 45 Or. 362 ( 77 Pac. 837 ); Voorhees v. Geiser-Hendryx Inv. Co., 52 Or. 602, 605 ( 98 Pac. 324 ); McCoy v. Huntley, 53 Or. 229 ( 99 Pac. 932 ). 2, 3. Section 182, L. O. … v.

Connertin v. Concannon

122 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1927

BROWN, J. Section 10119, Or. … Moreover, their meaning may be extended or restricted so as to comport with the testator’s intent: Gildersleeve v. Lee, supra, and cases there cited; Stubbs v.

Clackamas Town Center Associates v. Wolf

315 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1993

*559 TONGUE, retired Justice, pro tempore This is a companion case to Lloyd Corporation v. Whiffen, 315 Or 500 , 849 P2d 446 (1993) (Whiffen II), also decided this date. … they provided at such locations or, if no tables were provided, within the boundaries of each designated area. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed all provisions of the circuit court injunction, Clackamas Town Center Assoc. v.

Larsen v. Duke

116 Or. 25 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1925

Arthur & Co. v. Burke, 83 Wash. 690 ( 145 Pac. 974 ); Hastie et al. v. Burrage et al., 69 Kan. 560 ( 77 Pac. 268 ); Clark v. Powell’s Estate (Mo.), 208 S. W. 31 . … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

McAfee v. Thomas

121 Or. 351 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1927

See Wikle v. Woolley, 81 Ga. 106 ( 7 S. E. 210 ). We are not blazing a new trail in the matter, although the like cases are not numerous. In the case of McGill v. Young, 75 N. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.