Case law

Pace v. Edgemont Investment Co.

138 Or. 32 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1931

In the case of McCabe v. … Brown, Belt and Campbell, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. LeVasseur v. Merten

297 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1984

State ex rel Maizels v. Juba, 254 Or 323, 331-34, 460 P2d 850 (1969). In Henkel v. … State ex rel Adult & Family Ser. v. Stoutt, 57 Or App 303 , 644 P2d 1132 (1982).

Vandusen v. Shively

22 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 29, 1892

(Goodman v. Myrick, 5 Or. 65 .) The location of this line is a question of fact to be ascertained from the evidence. … It is distinctly traceable on the ground, according to the •evidence, by the marks and blazes on the trees, and substantially agrees with the reputed claim line as evidenced by the fence between Brown & Stevens and the fence

Ladd v. Holmes

40 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1901

Board of Sup’rs, 185 Ill. 288 ( 56 N. E. 1044 ). … So in Hanlon v. Board of Com’rs, 53 Ind. 123 .

State v. Eaton

119 Or. 613 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1926

IV, §20; State v. Wright, 14 Or. 365 , *616 371 ( 12 Pac. 708 ); Warren v. Crosby, 24 Or. 558 ( 34 Pac. 661 ); State v. Hawks, 110 Or. 497, 512 ( 222 Pac. 1071 ); First Nat. Bank v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Wilson v. City of Portland

87 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1917

Bean in Yamhill County v. … The rule has been applied to assessments similar to those of the case here involved, in Lapp v. Marshfield, 72 Or. 573 ( 144 Pac. 83 ). 3.

Arnold v. Gardiner Hill Timber Co.

199 Or. 517 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1953

Baldassarre v. West Oregon Lbr. Co., 193 Or 556, 561 , 239 P2d 839 ; Varley v. Consolidated Timber Co., 172 Or 157, 165 , 139 P2d 584 . … Valdin v. Holteen, 199 Or 134 , 260 P2d 504, 517 ; Nichols v. Union Pacific R. R. Co., 196 Or 488, 503 , 250 P2d 379 .

Cheffings v. Hines

104 Or. 81 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1922

BROWN, J. In. the case of Atchison etc. Ry. Co. v. Calhoun, 213 U. S. 1, 7 ( 53 L. Ed. 671 , 29 Sup. Ct. *87 Rep. 321, 322, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes), it was aptly observed by Mr. … Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 611 ( 101 Pac. 671 .)”

State v. Williams

366 Or. 495 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 2020

Brown, Chief Deputy Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. Also on the petition was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender. Timothy A. … For the reasons given in State v.

Macbeth v. Banfield

45 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1904

Eq. 501, 513; Van Cleve v. Berkey, 143 Mo. 109 ( 44 S. W. 743 , 42 L. R. A. 593, 598); Fogg v. Blair, 139 U. S. 118 (11 Sup. Ct. 476); Camden v. Stuart, 144 U. S. 104 (12 Sup. Ct. 585); Elyton Land Co. v. … W. 743 ); Boynton v. Andrews, 63 N. Y. 93 ; Douglass v. Ireland, 73 N. Y. 100 ; Lake Superior Iron Co. v. Drexel, 90 N. Y. 87 ; Elyton Land Co. v. Birmingham W. & E. Co. 92 Ala. 407, 423 ( 25 Am. St. Rep. 65 , 12 L. R.

Graf v. Wilson

62 Or. 476 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1912

The principle is announced in Ware v. Gowen, 65 Me. 534 , and in Miller v. Scoville, 35 Ill. … See, also, Cutter v. Perkins, 47 Me. 557 . *481 In Holbrook v. Waters, 19 Pick.

Marsden v. Harlocker

48 Or. 90 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1906

Rep. 224 ); Board of Commissioners v. Gwin, 136 Ind. 562 (36 N E. 237, 22 L. R. A. 402). … Chief Justice Horton, speaking for the court, says: “Counsel for the county board rely with a great deal of confidence upon the cases of Moore v. Hoisington, 31 Ill. 243 , and Dickey v.

State v. Loyer

303 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

We reaffirmed, most recently in State v. Clevenger, 297 Or 234 , 683 P2d 1360 (1984), and State v. … ORS 138.050 (1945). 4 The statute interpreted in State v.

Seagraves v. Portland City Temple

269 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1974

They obtained a license to operate the airport from the State Board of Aeronautics in 1970. ① Most take-offs from the airstrip are to the east, usually crossing over most of plaintiffs’ property before the aircraft turns … Defendants rely upon Atkinson v.

Gardner v. Portland

95 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1920

, board of public works, or any officer, contractor, or other person connected with such work, may have been irregular or defective, whether such irregularity be jurisdictional or otherwise # * .” … Justice Wolverton in Duniway v.

Hunt v. Ring

125 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1928

BROWN, J. Defendant bases his appeal upon the refusal of the trial court to grant his motion for a directed verdict. … See Ferguson v. Ingle, 38 Or. 43 ( 62 Pac. 760 ). Again, in the case of Caldwell Banking & Trust Co. v.

Wright v. Nothnagel

163 Or. 156 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1939

See Marshall v. Middleton, 100 Or. 247 , 191 P. 886 , 196 P. 830 , 19 A. L. R. 1421; Wright v. Wimberly, 94 Or. 1 , 184 P. 740 ; and Lutz v. Blackwell, 128 Or. 39 , 273 P. 705 . … The same form of decree was construed in Bruckman v.

Smith v. Cameron

123 Or. 501 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1927

Co. v. Stevinson, 164 Cal. 221 (128 *505 Pac. 924); Oritz v. Hansen, 35 Colo. 100 ( 83 Pac. 964 ); Neitzel v. Spokane International Ry. Co., 65 Wash. 100 ( 117 Pac. 864 , 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 522); Minnesota Canal etc. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Warren v. Crosby

24 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1893

v. … City of Lowell, 8 Metc. 172 ; Brown v. County Commissioners, 21 Pa. St. 42; State v. Fitzporter, 17 Mo. App. 273 ; Fosdick v. Village of Perrysburg, 14 Ohio St. 485 -6; Sedgwick, Statutory Law, 123.

Connertin v. Concannon

122 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1927

BROWN, J. Section 10119, Or. … Moreover, their meaning may be extended or restricted so as to comport with the testator’s intent: Gildersleeve v. Lee, supra, and cases there cited; Stubbs v.