Case law

Tyree v. Crystal Dist. Improvement Co.

64 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1912

Trumbo v. People, 75 Ill. 561 ; Munson v. Minor, 22 Ill. 594 ; Samuels v. Drainage Commissioners, 125 Ill. 536 ( 17 N. E. 829 ); People v. Knopf, 183 Ill. 410 ( 56 N. E. 155 ); Rosell v. Board of Education, 68 N. J. … Law, 498 ( 53 Atl. 398 ); State v. Collector, 39 N. J. Law, 79; Sudbury v. Heard, 103 Mass. 543 ; Koontz v. Hancock, 64 Md. 134 ( 20 Atl. 1039 ).

McCauley v. Pacific Atlantic Steamship Co.

167 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1941

In Masjulis v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 31 F. (2d) 284, the plaintiff was injured through the breaking of a rope. … What amounts to compulsion as applied to sailors aboard ship is shown by the excerpts quoted from Masjulis v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, supra, and South Atlantic Steamship Company v.

Egli v. Hutton

135 Or. 175 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1931

R. 391); Goehrig v. Stryker, 174 Fed. 897 ; Henry v. Phillips, 105 Tex. 459 ( 151 S. W. 533 ); Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 242 S. W. 197, 201; Jarriel v. Savannah Guano Co., 34 Ga. … Justice Brown in the case of Mount v.

Myers v. Clackamas County

98 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1921

The defendants, having met the issues and pleaded an affirmative defense without challenging the jurisdiction, cannot at this time raise the question of jurisdiction: Kitcherside v. Myers, 10 Or. 21 . ' 3. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Franconi v. Graham

89 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1918

These allegations sufficiently raise the issue of rescission so far as it may be of importance herein: Crown Cycle Co. v. Brown, 39 Or. 285 ( 64 Pac. 451 ). 2. … Higgins, 78 Ill. 440 ; Bean v. Miller, 69 Mo. 384 ; Grand Rapids etc. R. Co. v. Van Dusen, 29 Mich. 431 ; Peet v. East Grand Forks, 101 Minn. 518 ( 112 N. W. 1003 ); Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irr.

Roach v. City of Eugene

23 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1893

In Kneeland v. … V. Peter’s brick building, situated on the corner of Willamette and Eighth Streets.”

Northwestern Agencies, Inc. v. Flynn

138 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1931

*105 BROWN, J. … Unless this appears, there is no agreement: Hardy v. Sheedy, 58 Or. 195 ( 113 P. 1133 ); Hall v. Olson, 58 Or. 464 ( 114 P. 638 ); Henry v. Harker, 61 Or. 276 ( 118 P. 205 , 122 P. 298 ); Lueddemann v.

Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego

365 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 2019

Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Board of County Com'rs of Madison County , 373 Mont. 277 , 321 P. 3d 38 (2014). … Springfield Utility Board. v. Emerald PUD, 339 Or. 631 , 647, 125 P.3d 740 (2005) (citation omitted).

Lent v. Portland

42 Or. 488 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1903

Gazlay, 5 Ohio, 15; Goldthwaite v. City Cotmcil of Montgomery, 50 Ala. 486 ; Ex parte City Council of Montgomery (In re Knox), 64 Ala. 463 ; Ould v. City of Richmond, 23 Grat. 464 ( 14 Am. Rep. 139 ); Holland v. … City of Leavenworth, 3 Kan. 186, 203 ; People v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481 ; Bank of Rome v. Village of Rome, 18 N. Y. 38 .

Turner v. Locy

37 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1900

. § 5 ; Angell, Water Courses § 332; Gates v. Blincoe, 2 Dana, 153 ( 26 Am. Dec. 440 ); Stiles v. Laird, 5 Cal. 120 ( 63 Am. Dec. 110 ). … v.

State v. Olberman

33 Or. 556 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1899

It was held *558 in Kumli v. Southern Pacific Co., 21 Or. 505 ( 28 Pac. 637 ) and State v. … Law, 249 ; People v. Bemmerly, 98 Cal. 299 ( 33 Pac. 263 ).

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Eachus

320 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1995

Reading the texts of ORS 756.500(1), 756.515(3), and 756.580 in context, as PGE v. … See State v. Elliott, 204 Or 460, 464-65 , 277 P2d 754 , cert den 349 US 929 , 75 S Ct 772 , 99 L Ed 1260 (1955) (this court’s construction of a statute stands until changed by legislature); State v.

Assn. of Oregon Corrections Emp. v. State of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 2013

The Supreme Court explained the rationale for that rule in Labor Board v. … ERB took guidance from cases decided by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the federal act on which PECBA was modeled. Elvin v.

Chase v. Myers

328 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1999

See Witt v. … He designated the companion proposed initiative, discussed in Sager v. Myers, 328 Or 528 , 982 P2d 1104 (1999), as proposed initiative 29.

Commercial State Bank v. Eilers

124 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1928

Co. v. Hill, 20 Or. 177 ( 25 Pac. 379 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Motley

127 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1928

A defendant witness cannot be cross-examined at large to other offenses: State v. Deal, 52 Or. 568 ( 98 Pac. 165 ); State v. Holbrook, 98 Or. 43, 45, 63 ( 188 Pac. 947 , 192 Pac. 640 , 193 Pac. 434 ). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Keeler Bros. v. School Dist. No. 108

91 Or. 316 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1919

Murray, 6 Or. 17 ; Langford v. Jones, 18 Or. 330 ( 22 Pac. 1064 ); Jensen v. Foss, 24 Or. 158 ( 33 Pac. 535 ); McAlister v. Long, 33 Or. 368 ( 54 Pac. 194 ). However, we think the charge is substantially correct. … It might have been sufficient to have this appear in the records of the meeting, as was done in Amort v.

Elliott v. Bloyd

40 Or. 326 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1902

performed by the party of the second part, hereby bargain, sell, and convey to said party of the second part all the saw timber on the following described premises, * * * for the agreed price of twenty-five cents per thousand, board … Baisley, 28 Or. 119 ( 41 Pac. 936 ); Sheridan v. McMullen, 12 Or. 150 ( 6 Pac. 497 ). 2.

Western Union Tel. Co. v. Hurlburt

83 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1917

Co. v. Hartford etc. R. Co., 17 Conn. 40 ( 42 Am. Dec. 716 , 722); Gibbs v. Drew, 16 Fla. 147 ( 26 Am. Rep. 700 , 701). *640 “Corporate franchises,” says Mr. Justice Clifford, in Society for Savings v. … But however this may be, the plaintiff could have petitioned the county board of equalization for the reduction of its assessment of such franchise: Section 3609, L. O. L.

Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.

314 Or. 576 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1992

The board then submits the plan to the shareholders of each constituent corporation. … In Bonds v.