Case law

Washington County v. Clark

276 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1976

When, however, a default is taken in breach of an agreement, the integrity of the judicial process is blemished. 1 Freeman, Judgments, supra, at 557, citing Browning v. … Coleman v.

Gardner v. Portland

95 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1920

, board of public works, or any officer, contractor, or other person connected with such work, may have been irregular or defective, whether such irregularity be jurisdictional or otherwise # * .” … Justice Wolverton in Duniway v.

James v. City of Newberg

101 Or. 616 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1921

Citing Salisbury v. Andrews, 36 Mass. (19 Pick.) 250, 258 . … Muff v. Cameron, 134 Mo, App. 607 ( 114 S. W. 1125 , 1126, 117 S. W. 116 ).

Sutton v. Victorian

26 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1894

In Brown v. … Bossieux, 15 Grat. 83; Skyrme v. The Occidental Mining and Milling Company, 8 Nev. 219 ; Davis v. Bilsland, 18 Wall. 659 ; Kerr v. Moore, 54 Miss. 286 ; The American Eagle, 19 Fed. 879 ; The M.

Kincaid v. Peterson

135 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1930

The doctrine is closely akin to that of adverse possession, although the authorities recognize a clear distinction between them: Carstensen v. Brown, 32 Wyo. 491 ( 236 P. 517 ). … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Ruby v. West Coast Lumber Co.

139 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1932

Brown, [ 77 N. Y. 72 ] supra, that it is enough that the surety signs the note at the request of the person who has given the assurance that he would so sign it.” … Brown, Belt, and ■ Campbell, JJ., concur..

State v. Jones

250 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

The Committee report, at p 16, recommended repeal of OBS 137.160 because of the testimony given to the Committee by members of the Board of Parole and Probation that the- last sentence of the statute making a consecutive … This was answered by State v. Froembling, (1964), 237 Or 616 , 391 P2d 390 , cert den 379 US 937 (1964). The judgment is affirmed.

Delp v. Schiel

223 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1960

See Appel v. Fleuchaus, 8 NJ Misc 501, 151 A 97; Logan v. Brown, 20 Okla 334, 95 P 441 , 20 LRA NS 298. In any event, an oath is not required of a referee in the absence of statutory requirement. Meyer v. … Newcomb v. Wood, 97 US 581 , 24 L ed 1085; Logan v. Brown, supra. We do not find error in this assignment.

Mark v. Portland Gravel Co.

130 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1929

Rep. 194), Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, supra, Alaska Packers’ Assn. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 276 U. S. 467 ( 72 L. Ed. 656 , 48 Sup. Ct. Rep. 346, and Sultan Ry. Co. v. … Brown, J., absent.

Leadbetter v. Price

102 Or. 159 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1921

In White v. … Barnes v. Brown, 80 N. Y. 527 , was a case where the plaintiff was director and president of a corporation and owned a majority of the stock then issued. The corporation owed him for money loaned.

Brownell v. Heitman

125 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1928

In the case of McFarland v. … Bank v.

Kingery v. Department of Revenue

276 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1976

Brown testified that the book value was $21.96 per share and the capitalized income value was $14.20 per share. … See Unander v. Murphy, supra at 90.

State v. Muetzel

121 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1927

BROWN, J. … See, also, the following cases: United States v. Borkowski, 268 Fed. 408 ; Kathriner v. United States, 276 Fed. 808 ; Vachina v. United States, 288 Fed. 35; United States v. Rembert, 284 Fed. 996 ; United States v.

State v. Browning

47 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1905

Justice Mulkey, in Johnson v. … Sweet, 2 Or. 127 ; State v. Reinhart, 26 Or. 466 ( 38 Pac. 822 ).

Rosentreter v. Clackamas County

127 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1928

No change was made in the charge against the ac *536 cused: Erickson v. Marshfield, supra. The order to return the money deposited must have been made by the court or judge before the plaintiff could recover: Cameron v. … Cameron v. Burger, 60 Or. 458, 463 ( 120 Pac. 10 ). The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Taylor v. Nelson

139 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1932

*156 BROWN, J. While a number of exceptions were saved during the trial, but two assignments are here for our disposition.. … In Strowbridge v.

Dolan v. City of Tigard

319 Or. 567 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994

Dolan v. City of Tigard, _ US _, 114 S Ct 2309 , 129 L Ed 2d 304 (1994). … Dolan v. City of Tigard, 317 Or 110 , 854 P2d 437 (1993), affirming 113 Or App 162 , 832 P2d 853 (1992).

Hodgdon v. Goodspeed

60 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1911

Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos County, 30 Or. 250 ( 47 Pac. 852 ); White v. Brown, 54 Or. 7 ( 101 Pac. 900 ). 2, 3. … Kelly v. Van Austin, 17 Cal. 564 .

Samuelson v. Vinyard

120 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1926

The defendants constitute the board of directors of that district. … The case is governed substantially by Ivie v. Min ton, 75 Or. 463 ( 147 Pac. 395 ).

Parrish v. Stephens

1 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1853

(Corning et al. v. Lorverre, 6 Johns. Ch. Rep. 439 ; City of Georgetown v. The Alexandria Canal Co. 12 Peters, 91 ; Cowler v. Tucker, 19 Vesey, 616; Brown v. Manning, 6 Hammond Rep. 298; Leberg v. … We think that the cases of Cincinnati v. White, 6 Peters, 431 ; Barclay et al. v. Howel's Lessee, 6 Peters, 498 ; New-Orleans v. The United States, 10 Peters, 662; Trustees of Watertown v. Cowen, 4 Paige Ch.