Case law

State Ex Rel. Bowles v. Olson

175 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1944

Miller v. Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, 22 Cal. (2d) 818, 142 P. (2d) 297 ; Brown v. DeConcini, Arizona, 60 Ariz. 476 , 140 P. (2d) 224 ; Lapinski v. … Brown v. DeConcini, supra. See Anderson v. Carter, 159 Kan. 1 , 150 P. (2d) 754 .

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

325 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

See State ex rel Compass Corp. v. … See Holland v.

State v. Flanigan

316 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1993

State v. Flanigan, 114 Or App 50, 53 , 834 P2d 472 (1992). … Relying on its holding in State v.

Hamilton v. Fluornoy

44 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1903

Fluornoy obtained a certificate of purchase from the State land board to the lots designated for the consideration of $82.34, of which he paid $27.44; that thereafter he paid $60.21 interest upon the balance of the purchase … McCormick, 18 Or. 301, 305 ( 22 Pac. 1062 ); Ambrose v. Huntington, 34 Or. 484 ( 56 Pac. 513 ); Bartholomew v. Edwards, 1 Houst. 17 ; Walsh v. Hill, 41 Cal. 571 .

Seabrook v. Coos Bay Ice Co.

49 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1907

His decision was accepted and acted upon by the state land board, and is final until an error is shown and the deed corrected in some manner authorized by law. … Cottle, 21 Or. 580 : 28 Pac. 901 ; Baker County v.

Jacobberger v. School District No. 1

114 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1925

There is no allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff’s claim herein was ever presented to the school board for audit, and such presentation has been distinctly held to be necessary: Barrow v. School Dist.

Bank of Gresham v. Clarke

140 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1932

This would be true if the note was taken as collateral: Oregon Code 1930, 57-202; American National Bank v. Kerley, 109 Or. 155 ( 220 P. 116 , 32 A. L. R. 262); see note to Exchange National Bank v. Coe, 31 L. R. A. (N. … J., Brown and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Lessard v. Snell

155 Or. 293 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1937

E. 91 ); Attorney General ex rel. v. Board of Canvassers, 155 Mich. 44 ( 118 N. W. 584 ); State ex rel. v. Corley (Del.), 172 Atl. 415 ; 12 C. J. 885. As stated by the court in Ellison v. … In State v.

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Eachus

320 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1995

Reading the texts of ORS 756.500(1), 756.515(3), and 756.580 in context, as PGE v. … See State v. Elliott, 204 Or 460, 464-65 , 277 P2d 754 , cert den 349 US 929 , 75 S Ct 772 , 99 L Ed 1260 (1955) (this court’s construction of a statute stands until changed by legislature); State v.

State v. Farnam

82 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1916

Allen Brown testified that he stayed at the Gilliam house on the night of December 8th. … Brown went to bed about 10 o’clock on the night of the 8th, but was kept awake by a dislocated thumb until about 2 or 3 in the morning.

Selbee v. Multnomah County

247 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1967

Being dissatisfied with the award of damages made by the Board of County Road Viewers and approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, pursuant to ORS 368.525. … See Stanley v. City of Salem, 247 Or 60 , 427 P2d 406 .

Macbeth v. Banfield

45 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1904

Eq. 501, 513; Van Cleve v. Berkey, 143 Mo. 109 ( 44 S. W. 743 , 42 L. R. A. 593, 598); Fogg v. Blair, 139 U. S. 118 (11 Sup. Ct. 476); Camden v. Stuart, 144 U. S. 104 (12 Sup. Ct. 585); Elyton Land Co. v. … W. 743 ); Boynton v. Andrews, 63 N. Y. 93 ; Douglass v. Ireland, 73 N. Y. 100 ; Lake Superior Iron Co. v. Drexel, 90 N. Y. 87 ; Elyton Land Co. v. Birmingham W. & E. Co. 92 Ala. 407, 423 ( 25 Am. St. Rep. 65 , 12 L. R.

Marsden v. Harlocker

48 Or. 90 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1906

Rep. 224 ); Board of Commissioners v. Gwin, 136 Ind. 562 (36 N E. 237, 22 L. R. A. 402). … Chief Justice Horton, speaking for the court, says: “Counsel for the county board rely with a great deal of confidence upon the cases of Moore v. Hoisington, 31 Ill. 243 , and Dickey v.

Kerschner v. Smith

121 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1927

Louis V. Lundburg and Mr. B. A. Green, with an oral argument by Mr. Lundburg. BROWN, J. … From the beginning, however, this court has recognized that a void default judgment is appealable: See Fassman v. Baumgartner, 3 Or. 469 ; Smith v. Ellendale Mill Co., 4 Or. 70 ; Trullenger v.

Ritchie v. Pittman

144 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1933

Ah Doon v. Smith, 25 Or. 89 ( 34 P. 1093 ); Sayres v. Allen, 25 Or. 211 ( 35 P. 254 ); Blue v. P. R. L. & P. Co., 60 Or. 122 ( 117 P. 1094 ); Marshall v. Brown, 108 Or. 658 ( 218 P. 923 ). … Oldenburg v. Oregon Sugar Company, 39 Or. 564 ( 65 P. 869 ); Sheppard v. Yocum, 10 Or. 402 ; 2 Wigmore on Evidence (2d Ed.) 477, § 1029.

Mark v. Portland Gravel Co.

130 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1929

Rep. 194), Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. Rohde, supra, Alaska Packers’ Assn. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 276 U. S. 467 ( 72 L. Ed. 656 , 48 Sup. Ct. Rep. 346, and Sultan Ry. Co. v. … Brown, J., absent.

Burke v. Pardey

125 Or. 245 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1928

J., § 199, p. 64; DeYulio v. Brownell, 107 Or. 651, 657 ( 215 Pac. 576 ); Castleman v. Stryker, 107 Or. 48 ( 213 Pac. 436 ). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Kincaid v. Peterson

135 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1930

The doctrine is closely akin to that of adverse possession, although the authorities recognize a clear distinction between them: Carstensen v. Brown, 32 Wyo. 491 ( 236 P. 517 ). … J., and Brown, J., concur.

Brownell v. Heitman

125 Or. 515 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1928

In the case of McFarland v. … Bank v.

McAleny v. Max J. Kuney Co.

331 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 2001

The case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings in light of this court’s decision in Robinson v. Nabisco, Inc., 331 Or 178 , 11 P3d 1286 (2000).