Case law

State v. Hutcheson

251 Or. 589 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1968

To the same effect, see People v. … In Sweden v.

Haines v. Hall

17 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1888

Y. 454 ; Hickok v. Hine, 23 Ohio, 523; Whisler v. Wilkinson, 22 Wis. 572 ; Sellers v. Union Lumbering Co., 39 Wis. 525 ; Holden v. Robinson Mfg. Co., 65 Me. 215 ; Gerrish v. Brown, 51 Me. 256 ; Morgan v. … Their liability to pay damages to the riparian proprietor for traveling upon the banks to propel their logs is expressly recognized in Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Me. 9 , relied upon by the defendant here.” In Brown v.

Lane v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Enginemen & Firemen

157 Or. 667 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1937

Co. v. Stankard, supra, quoted in Shipe v. Norfolk & Western Ry. … Rowe v. Williams, 97 Mass. 163; Pearl v. Harris, 121 *687 Mass. 390; White v. Middlesex Railroad, 135 Mass. 216 ; Lewis v. Brotherhood Acc. Co., 194 Mass. 1 , 79 N. E. 802 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 714; Bauer v.

State v. Nesmith

136 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1931

*594 BROWN, J. The defendant asserts that the indictment does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime. … See State v. Edy, 117 Or. 430 ( 244 P. 538 ), and cases there cited. See, also, State v. Gauthier, 113 Or. 297 ( 231 P. 141 ); *598 State v. Hilton, 119 Or. 441 ( 249 P. 1103 ).

State v. Bellek

316 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1993

State v. Bellek, 114 Or App 17, 20 , 834 P2d 458 (1992). For the reasons stated in State v. … case to the circuit court with directions to delete the sentence of “imprisonment for life” and impose, instead, a judgment that provides for post-prison supervision “for the remainder of the [defendant’s] life, unless the Board

Field v. Rodgers

128 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1929

See, also, Branch v. Lambert, 103 Or. 423, 434 ( 205 Pac. 995 ); Goltra v. Penland, 45 Or. 264 ( 77 Pac. 129 ); Harding v. Grim, 25 Or. 506, 508 ( 36 Pac. 634 ); Quinn v. Gross, 24 Or. 150 ( 33 Pac. 535 ) 5 Consor v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

O.-W. R. & Nav. Co. v. Castner

66 Or. 580 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1913

Ry. v. Greenville, 69 Ohio St. 487 ( 69 N. E. 976 ); 22 Cyc. 771. 2. … Coos County, 30 Or. 309 ( 47 Pac. 851 ); Smith v. Portland, 25 Or. 297 ( 35 Pac. 665 ); Barton v. La Grande, 17 Or. 577 (22 Pac. 111); Vincent v. Umatilla County, 14 Or. 375 ( 12 Pac. 732 ).

State v. Williams

117 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1925

Skidmore v. Commonwealth, 204 Ky. 451 ( 264 S. W. 1053 ); Sizemore v. Commonwealth, 202 Ky. 273 ( 259 S. W. 337 .)” The question at bar was answered in Braseale v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Ackerley Communications, Inc. v. Multnomah County

303 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1987

In Banister Continental Corp. v. NW Pipeline Corp., 301 Or 763 , 724 P2d 822 (1986), we vacated a decision of the Court of Appeals when the case was settled and became moot after argument in this court. In Saechao v. … Compare Banister Continental Corp. v. N.W. Pipeline Corp., 301 Or. 763 (1986).

State v. California Oregon Power Co.

225 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1961

Plaintiff relies heavily upon Kesterson v. California-Oregon Power Co., 114 Or 22 , 228 P 1092 (1925) in arguing that the interest created in the case at bar was possessory. … See, State v. Gourley et al., 209 Or 363 , 305 P2d 396 , 306 P2d 1117 (1957) (both the owner and the independent logging contractor subject to statutory duty).

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

325 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

See State ex rel Compass Corp. v. … See Holland v.

Samuelson v. Vinyard

120 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1926

The defendants constitute the board of directors of that district. … The case is governed substantially by Ivie v. Min ton, 75 Or. 463 ( 147 Pac. 395 ).

Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Lynch

215 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1959

As the supreme court of the state has said, the board’s duties are much like those of a referee. (And see Washington ex rel. Oregon R. & Nav. Co. v. Fairchild, 224 US 510, 526, 527 , 56 L. ed. 863, 868, 869, 32 Sup. Ct. … State Board of Medical Registration and Examination v. Scherer, 221 Ind 92, 46 NE2d 602 (1943); Langen v. Badlands Cooperative State Grazing Dist., 125 Mont 302 , 234 P2d 467 (1951); Jones v.

Burke v. Burke

216 Or. 691 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1959

Anderson v. Anderson, 214 Cal 414, 5 P2d 881, 882 ; In re Wray’s Estate, supra. The court below was evidently of the opinion that Westfall v. Westfall, 100 Or 224 , 197 P 271 , holds to the contrary. … For example, see, State v. Shoemaker, 62 Iowa 343 , 17 NW 589 , 49 Am Rep 146; Miller v. Anderson, 43 Ohio St 473, 3 NE 605 , 54 Am Rep 823.

Hamilton v. Fluornoy

44 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1903

Fluornoy obtained a certificate of purchase from the State land board to the lots designated for the consideration of $82.34, of which he paid $27.44; that thereafter he paid $60.21 interest upon the balance of the purchase … McCormick, 18 Or. 301, 305 ( 22 Pac. 1062 ); Ambrose v. Huntington, 34 Or. 484 ( 56 Pac. 513 ); Bartholomew v. Edwards, 1 Houst. 17 ; Walsh v. Hill, 41 Cal. 571 .

State v. Flanigan

316 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1993

State v. Flanigan, 114 Or App 50, 53 , 834 P2d 472 (1992). … Relying on its holding in State v.

Sammons v. Paterson

127 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1928

BROWN, J. This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants in an action tried upon a demurrer to the complaint. … In this connection, the Supreme Court of Massachusetts in Buffington v. McNally, 192 Mass. 198 ( 78 N.

Hofen v. United States National Bank

215 Or. 603 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1959

Hardy v. Barbour, 304 SW2d 21 , 304 Mo Cas 21; Sterling v. Dubin, 6 Ill2d 64, 126 NE2d 718 ; In re Brush’s Will, 1 AD2d 625, 152 NYS2d 545 . … State Land Board v. Sovenko, 202 Or 571 , 277 P2d 781 . Reversed.

State v. Jackson

9 Or. 457 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

(Wade v. State, 50 Ala., 166 ; Commonwealth *460 v. Mullins, 2 Allen, 295 ; State v. Levy, 23 Minn., 109 ; Gallin v. State, 39 Texas, 130 ; Brown v. State, 2 Tex. Ch. App., 122; State v. Scanlan, 58 Mo., 205 ; State v. … As applicable to this case, and in our judgment with much stronger reason, we adopt the principle laid down in the State v.

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Eachus

320 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1995

Reading the texts of ORS 756.500(1), 756.515(3), and 756.580 in context, as PGE v. … See State v. Elliott, 204 Or 460, 464-65 , 277 P2d 754 , cert den 349 US 929 , 75 S Ct 772 , 99 L Ed 1260 (1955) (this court’s construction of a statute stands until changed by legislature); State v.