Case law

Hewitt v. Andrews

69 Or. 581 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1914

If a party has been defrauded by another, he must act promptly and at once restore or offer to return the property which he has received: Vaughn v. Smith, 34 Or. 54 ( 55 Pac. 99 ); Sievers v. … Brown, 36 Or. 218 ( 56 Pac. 170 ); Clarno v. Grayson, 30 Or. 111 ( 46 Pac. 426); Scott v. Walton, 32 Or. 460 ( 52 Pac. 180 ); Waymire v. Shipley, 52 Or. 464 ( 97 Pac. 807 ); Elgin v. Snyder, 60 Or. 297 ( 118 Pac. 280 ).

Scandinavian-American Bank v. Went-Worth Lumber Co.

101 Or. 151 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1921

Justice Burnett, in the case of Masters v. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

Menefee v. Blitz

181 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1947

This well encountered Jacalitos production zone at 588 feet, and brown shale at 1100 feet. There were several good showings in brown shale down to 1718 feet, at which depth it was suspended for lack of money. … Sherman Clay Co. , 141 Or. 270 , 17 P.2d 319 ; Bannon v. Thompson , 136 Or. 311 , 298 P. 907 ; Klinge v. Farris , 128 Or. 142 , 268 P. 748 ; 273 P. 945 ; Brownell v. Heitman , 125 Or. 515 , 266 P. 1067 ; Bryant v.

Allen v. Craig

102 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1921

Co. v. Jackson County, 38 Or. 589, 602 ( 64 Pac. 307 , 65 Pac. 369 ). … The judgment rendered by the board of equalization has not been reviewed, nor revised, nor modified; but, upon the contrary, at the time of the trial in the Circuit Court the judgment of the board of equalization stood as

Hooning v. Henry

106 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1923

We are aware that there is a difference among the courts as to the measure of damages in cases of misrepresentation, but this court is committed by the case of Southern Oregon Orchards Co. v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

First National Bank v. County Court of Yamhill

110 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924

levy of taxes for Yamhill County, and declined and refused to order or make a levy of taxes for raising the money necessary to pay the said items of indebtedness or any part thereof, but made an order directing the levying board … from making a levy of taxes contrary to the order of the Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission: Chapter 208, Laws 1921; Chapter 142, Laws 1923. *80 In an opinion handed down to-day (State ex rel. v.

State v. Carroll

155 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1936

Hollis were employed as seamen on board the “Larry Doheny”, which on the date named was anchored at the Shell Oil docks, Portland. … State v. Sanders, 92 S. C. 427 ( 75 S. E. 702 , 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 424); State v. Cody, 94 Iowa 169 ( 62 N. W. 702 ); Tarver v. State, 43 Ala. 354 ; People v. Lilley, 43 Mich. 521 ( 5 N. W. 982 ); State v.

Eagle Point v. Hanscom

121 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1927

It is not enough that it be connected with the transaction: Wait v. Wheeler & Wilson, 23 Or. 297, 301 ( 31 Pac. 661 ); Miser v. O’Shea, 37 Or. 231, 235 ( 62 Pac. 491 , 82 Am. St. Rep. 751 ); Chance v. … J., and Brown and McBride, JJ., concur.

Pederson v. Patterson

124 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1927

BROWN, J. The plaintiff in the instant case is an injured employee, subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the State of Oregon. … In the case of Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U. S. 425 ( 30 L. Ed. 178 , 6 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1121), Mr.

State v. Coleman

119 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1926

BROWN, J. At the time of the alleged commission of the offense, the defendant, with his family, was living in the basement of the courthouse of Wasco County. … Embezzlement is a form of larceny: State v. Browning, 47 Or. 470 ( 82 Pac. 955 ). But under the statute it is a separate and distinct offense.

Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc. v. Flagg

177 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1944

Ct. 45 ; Texas v. United States, 292 U. S. 522 , 78 L. Ed. 1402 , 54 S. Ct. 819 ; United States v. Lowden, 308 U. S. 225 , 84 L. Ed. 208 , 60 S. Ct. 248 ; International Railway Company v. … S. (2d) 125; Fornarotto v. *43 Board of Public Utility Commissioners of New Jersey, 105 N. J. L. 28, 143 Atl. 450, 453 .

Crosby v. Portland Ry. Co.

53 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1909

The avenue at the place of the accident was paved with wooden boards between and on each side of the rails. … In State v.

Parsons v. Boggie

139 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1932

Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co., 59 Or. 149 ( 116 P. 1056 ); Hodges v. George T. Mickle Lumber Co., 124 Or. 515 , ( 264 P. 850 ); Coquille M. and T. Co. v. Dollar Co., 132 Or. 453 ( 285 P. 244 ); Kreinbring v. … J., Brown and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.

329 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1999

Abu-Adas v. Employment Dept., 325 Or 480, 485 , 940 P2d 1219 (1997); see also PGE v. … . & L. v. OSHRC, 737 F2d 350, 358 (3d Cir 1984); Ocean Electric Corp. v.

Taggart v. Hunter

78 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1915

It, is also unnecessary if no price has been named in the contract, or the property has been sold for what it is reasonably worth: 3 Jones Ev., § 429; Hoadly v. McLaine, 10 Bing. 482; Browne, Stat. … Taggart could not, in the nature of affairs, agree to sell the land: Brown, Stat. Frauds, § 353a.

In Re Guardianship of Baldwin

130 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1929

Merely because the child may be given a better home and may be surrounded with more culture and wealth *209 does not justify a court in depriving a father of the love of his own child: Mead v. … Brown, J., absent.

Tanous v. Johnston

113 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1925

De Bow v. Wollenberg, supra, is in conflict with Craig v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

In Re Ankelis

164 Or. 676 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1940

Ex parte Biggs, 52 Or. 433 , 97 P. 713 , and State v. Prendergast, 84 Or. 307 , 164 P. 1178 , are relied upon by the accused as authority for tMs contention. … The disbarment of an attorney at law is not a criminal action, but is a proceeding sui generis: State ex rel. v. Arnold, 145 Or. 634, 639 , 28 P. (2d) 846 .

Harding v. Oregon-Idaho Co.

57 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1910

In Henrichsen v. … This case was followed and applied in Trickey v. Clark, 50 Or. 516, 519 ( 93 Pac. 457 ) ; Freeman v. Trummer, 50 Or. 287 ( 91 Pac. 1077 ), and Patty v.

State Housing Council v. City of Lake Oswego

291 Or. 878 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1981

See Springfield Education Ass’n. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980), McPherson v. Employment Div., 285 Or 541, 591 P2d 1381 (1979). The petition for review is dismissed. … See Meeker v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Clatsop Cty., 287 Or 665 , 601 P2d 804 (1979) (subdivision), Petersen v. Klamath Falls, 279 Or 249 , 566 P2d 1193 (1977) *883 (annexation).