Case law

Schneider v. Haas

14 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1887

Couch v. Ryan, 66 Ala. 244 , announces the same rule. (Ches *177 ter v. Brown, 55 Cal. 46 .) Our attention lias not been called to any satisfactory authority holding the other way. … Watts v. Holland, 56 Texas, 54 , has been cited by the respondent.

Boise Payette Lumber Co. v. National Surety Corp.

167 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1941

“Thus in Clapp v. Meserole, (1864) 1 Abb. App. Dec. (N. … Doering v. Doering (Eng.) 42 Chancery Div. 203; In re Hart’s Estate, 53 A. 373 .” State v.

Bouche Et Ux v. Wagner Et Ux

206 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1956

In New Mexico v. United States Trust Co., 172 US 171, 183 , 19 S Ct 128 , it is stated: “In Keener v. Union Pacific Railway, 31 Fed. Rep. 126, 128, Mr. … The rule is well-stated in Rogers v.

McDonald v. Halvorson

308 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1989

During winter or when exposed to ocean *346 waves, the tops of silverweed turn brown. … McDonald v. Halvorson, supra, 92 Or App at 485-86 (footnotes omitted). 4. Public Use of Ocean Beaches — State ex rel Thornton v.

Muse v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

200 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1954

Zimmerman v. West Coast Trans-Oceanic S. S. Lines, 199 Or 78 , 258 P2d 1003, 1006 . … Correia v. Bennett, 199 Or 374 , 261 P2d 851, 855 ; Clark v. Fazio et al., 191 Or 522, 528 , 230 P2d 553 ; Lyons v. Browning et al., 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599 . The order granting new trial is affirmed.

Wiley v. Reasoner

69 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1914

See State v. Schluer, 59 Or. 18 ( 115 Pac. 1057 ). … A similar dilemma as to precincts occurred in Lane County (State v.

Gregor v. City of Portland

126 Or. 49 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1928

City of Salem, *52 63 Or. 126 ( 123 Pac. 1096 ); Keane v. City of Portland, 115 Or. 1, 7 ( 235 Pac. 677 ); In re Board of Directors v. Peck, 91 Or. 33, 45 ( 178 Pac. 186 ). … The council could not delegate its authority: Allen v. City of Portland, 35 Or. 420 ( 58 Pac. 509 ); In re Board of Directors v. Peck , above; Keane v. City of Portland, above; McQuiddy v. Vineyard, 60 Mo. App. 610 .

Wilson v. Tarter

22 Or. 504 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1892

(Boqut v. Coburn, 27 Barb. 230 .) … Brown, 7 Neb. 449 ; Pardee v. Van Anken, 3 Barb. 534 .

Coleman v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.

318 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1993

MEMORANDUM OPINION Neither this court nor the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of this appeal, because the petition for judicial review was not timely served on the Workers’ Compensation Board, as required by ORS 656.298 … Southwest Forest Industries v. Anders, 299 Or 205, 218-19 , 701 P2d 432 (1985).

Columbia Sun, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

321 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1995

In NW Alliance for Market Equality v. … See Napier v. Lincoln Co.

Wilkes v. Cornelius

21 Or. 348 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1891

(Mehaffy v. Share, 2 P. & W. 361; Hack v. Stewart, 8 Pa. St. 213.) … As was said in Cook v.

Meyer v. Harvey Aluminum

263 Or. 487 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1972

The two exceptions are Cross v. Harris, 230 Or 398 , 370 P2d 703 (1962), and Brown v. Johnston, 258 Or 284 , 482 P2d 712 (1971). The former concerned barley damaged by a negligent crop duster. … In Brown v. Johnston, supra ( 258 Or 284 ), the jury found the plaintiff’s tree was killed by an intentional application of a herbicide into the root system where it extended onto the defendant’s property.

Hamilton v. Blair

23 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1892

The trial court in disposing of the case proceeded upon the principle, as held by this court in Brown v. Northcutt, 14 Or. 529 ( 13 Pac. … stock more than their proportion, that they contribute the excess to those who have not received their proper proportion. * * * Thus complete justice will be done and a multiplicity of suits and expense avoided ”: Dole v.

Robinson v. State Tax Commission

216 Or. 532 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 13, 1959

American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of Revision of Cuyahoga County, 139 Ohio St 388, 40 NE 426 , 427. … Mining Co. v.

Hooning v. Henry

106 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1923

We are aware that there is a difference among the courts as to the measure of damages in cases of misrepresentation, but this court is committed by the case of Southern Oregon Orchards Co. v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

State v. Tranchell

119 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1926

BROWN, J. … The defendant further rests her case upon that of State v. Odell, 8 Or. 30 . This is not sound reasoning.

Riedel v. Royce

130 Or. 440 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1929

Citing Morrison v. Carpenter et al., 179 Mich. 207 ( 146 N. W. 106 , Ann. Cas. 1915D, 319); Walsh v. Wilkes-Barre, 215 Pa. 226 ( 64 Atl. 407 ); Doster v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. (Mo. App.), 158 S. … Brown, J., absent.

Clark v. Jones

91 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1919

However, that question was decided adversely to the defendants in the cases of Houston v. Keats Auto Co., 85 Or. 125 -129 ( 166 Pac. 531 ); West v. Kern, 88 Or. 247 -254 ( 171 Pac. 413 , 1050 L. R. … The defendants cite and rely upon the case of Harder v.

First National Bank v. County Court of Yamhill

110 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924

levy of taxes for Yamhill County, and declined and refused to order or make a levy of taxes for raising the money necessary to pay the said items of indebtedness or any part thereof, but made an order directing the levying board … from making a levy of taxes contrary to the order of the Tax Supervising and Conservation Commission: Chapter 208, Laws 1921; Chapter 142, Laws 1923. *80 In an opinion handed down to-day (State ex rel. v.

State v. Carmody

60 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1907

Thus á court will not judicially notice a county created by county commissioners under a general law (Buckinghouse v. Gregg, 19 Ind. 401 ), or a township formed by a board of county commissioners (Bragg v. … Board of Commissioners of Rush County, 34 Ind. 405 ), or a town incorporated under a general law (City of Hopkins v. Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R.