Case law

Wells v. Ellison

133 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1930

The court, never having acquired jurisdiction of the person of the alleged incompetent, could not render or enter a valid order adjudging her an incompetent or appointing a guardian over her person or estate: May v. … Belt, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Smith v. Enterprise Irrigation District

160 Or. 372 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1938

Co. v. Ochoco Irrigation District, 108 Or. 1, 53 , 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 . This case renders untenable the fourth ground suggested in support of said demurrer. … As to the relief sought herein, plaintiffs could not obtain it by an appeal to the board of equalization of defendant district.

Camp Carson Mining Co. v. Stephenson

84 Or. 690 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1917

Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 216 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or. 173 ( 96 Pac. 124, 1065 ) ; Todd v. Pac. Ry. & Nav. … Co., 59 Or. 249 ( 110 Pac. 391 , 117 Pac. 300 ); Carroll v. McLaren, 60 Or. 233 ( 118 Pac. 1034 ); Friendly v. Ruff, 61 Or. 42 ( 120 Pac. 745 ); Kingsley v. United Rys. Co., 66 Or. 50 ( 133 Pac. 785 ) ; Parker v.

Dahl & Penne, Inc. v. State Bank

110 Or. 68 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1924

Bank v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 46 N. Y. 82 ( 7 Am. Rep. 314 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Savage

36 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1900

Saunders, 14 *204 Or. 300 ( 12 Pac. 441 ); Kumli v. Southern Pac. Co. 21 Or. 505 ( 28 Pac. 637 ) : State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ); State v. Kelly, 28 Or. 225 ( 52 Am. St. Rep. 777 , 42 Pac. 217 ); State v. … Brown, Compiler.”

Carson v. Gentner

33 Or. 512 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1898

In Vansickle v. … In Jones v.

Central Oregon Irr. Co. v. Whited

76 Or. 255 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1914

Dean, 58 Or. 475 ( 115 Pac. 154 ); Micelli v. Andrus, 61 Or. 78, 89 ( 120 Pac. 737 ); Mendenhall v. … His report to the state land board was made June 2, 1904.

Abraham v. Oregon & California R. R.

64 L.R.A. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1900

Co. v. Rich, 19 Kan. 517 ( 27 Am. Rep. 159 ) ; Gurney v. Minneapolis, etc. Elev. Co. 63 Minn. 70 (30 L. R. A. 534, 65 N. W. 136 ) ; Illinois, etc. R. R. Co. v. Wathen, 17 Ill. App. 582 . … Co. v. Board of Supers of Crawford County, 29 Wis. 116 ; Milwaukee & St. P. Ry. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 34 Wis. 271 ; Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. Board of Sup’rs of Crawford County, 48 Wis. 666 ( 5 N.

Van Eck v. Oregon State Employes Ass'n

281 Or. 255 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1978

The Appeal Board will be composed of three members of the Association: (1) one member selected by the Association Board, (2) one member selected by the employe, (3) one member mutually agreed upon by the other two members … In support of this proposition plaintiff cites Operating Engineers v. Flair Builders, 406 US 487 (1972) and Zeller v. Board of Higher Education, 91 LRRM 2854 (NY 1975), among other cases.

Shaw v. Proffitt

57 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1910

To the same effect are Lavery v. Arnold, 36 Or. 84 ( 57 Pac. 906 : 58 Pac. 524 ) ; Hallock v. Suitor, 37 Or. 9, 13 ( 60 Pac. 384 ) ; Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co., 48 Or. 277, 284 ( 86 Pac. 361 ) ; Sumpter Ry. Co. v. … A permanent way appears to have been the intention of the parties, and *217 such intention must control: Brown v. Honeyfield, 139 Iowa 414 ( 116 N. W. 731 ) ; Pifer v. Brown, 43 W. Va. 412 ( 27 S. E. 399 : 49 L. R.

City of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & Industries

298 Or. 104 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1984

See our discussion of the system in Portland Police Ass’n v. Civil Service Board, 292 Or 433 , 639 P2d 619 (1982). … Service Board that the Council had no power to override.

Ingram v. Basye

67 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1913

Cornelius, 21 Or. 348 ( 28 Pac. 135 ); Bennett v. Stephens, 8 Or. 444 ; Fitzpatrick v. Dooley, 112 Mo. App. 165 ( 86 S. W. 719 ); Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ( 53 Am. Dec. 301 ). … Under such circumstances a promise to pay wages will not be implied: Williams v. Hutchinson, 3 N. Y. 312 ( 53 Am. Dec. 301 ); Tyler v. Burrington, 39 Wis. 376 . As was said in Schrimpf v.

SCH. DIST. NO. 1, MULT. CO. v. Bruck

225 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1960

We have had the recent occasion to hold that district school boards are vested with implied power to carry out the statutory mandates imposed upon them to provide and operate schools. Dilger v. … When and how that duty must be performed should be left to the school district board. The discretion is properly vested in that body.

Milarkey v. Foster

6 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

(Brown v. Watson, 47 Me., 161.)

Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.

260 Or. 308 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1971

See for example, Gariepy v. Pearson, 207 F2d 15 (D.C. Cir 1953); Thackrey v. Patterson, 157 F2d 614 (D.C. Cir 1946); Hinsdale v. … Orange County Publications, Inc., 17 NY2d 284 , 270 NYS2d 592 , 217 NE2d *312 650 (1966); Brown v. DuFrey, 1 NY2d 190 , 134 NE2d 469 (1956); Sydney v.

Gallagher v. Kelliher

58 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1911

In Turner v. Baker, 64 Mo. 238 ( 27 Am. … This rule concedes that he who secures possession of real property thereby obtains a prior right against all persons except the owner, and is recognized in Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11, 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ), and Sommer v.

Hendrix v. Hendrix

246 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1967

Both children continued to live with their mother and neither child contributed anything for board or lodging. The lower court denied both motions, and the defendant appeals. … Smith v. Smith, 212 Or 654 , 320 P2d 1111 (1958).

State v. Carlson

311 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1991

Cleary, Strong, Brown & Mostellar, supra, at 17. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 358-59 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); State v. Madison, 290 Or 573, 580 , 624 P2d 599 (1981). The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed.

Chung Yow v. Hop Chong

11 Or. 220 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

upon which they were painted in Chinese characters hung in the Joss House,—offered said board, with regulations thereon, in evidence. … Co. v. Wright, 10 Or., 162 .) And that has not *225 been done in this case. This point is not, therefore, before' us, and cannot be examined. The judgment is affirmed.

Kamm v. Normand

50 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1907

v. … Court of *12 Maine, in Brown v. Chadbourne, 31 Me. 9 ( 1 Am.