Case law

Wilson & Hollenbeck v. U. S. Lumber & Box Co.

108 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1923

BROWN, J. This case presents no serious legal questions. The problems involved herein are problems of fact, and not of law. The law governing this case is well settled in this jurisdiction: Baker v. … It is settled law in this state that a motion for a nonsuit is, in effect, a demurrer to the evidence, and that such a motion admits all that the evidence proves or tends to prove: Brown v. Oregon Lbr.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hendrick

346 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 2009

See, e.g., Thompson v. Coughlin, 329 Or. 630, 640 , 997 P.2d 191 (2000) (jury trial); Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 61-62 , 93 S.Ct. 80 , 34 L.Ed.2d 267 (1972) (unbiased decisionmaker); cf. Rivera v. … In Paulson , the accused argued that the Board of Bar Governors and the Bar's disciplinary counsel "`actually appoints the disciplinary board,'" from which the trial panels are drawn, and that this court had abandoned *496

Duniway v. Portland

47 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1905

Seattle, 13 Wash. 444 ( 43 Pac. 367 ); State ex rel. v. City of Newark, 34 N. J. Law, 236; City of Emporia v. Norton, 13 Kan. 569 ; Schenley v. Commonwealth, 36 Pa. 29 ( 78 Am. Dec. 359 ); City of St. Paul v. … Smith, 22 Minn. 218 ; People v. Common Council, 5 Lans. 11 ; Staats v. Washington, 45 N. J. Law, 318.

Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education District

286 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1979

As we stated in Gilbertson v. … See, e.g., Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 US 564 (1972). We also need not reach the issue of waiver.

Wagner v. Portland

40 Or. 389 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1902

under certain circumstances boards are nonconductors; that all these things are relative, depending upon the voltage; that a dry board is a nonconductor; that if a person is standing on a dry board, and the voltage is comparatively … Supp. 5 ); Golden v. Sieghardt, 23 App. Div. 161 ( 53 N. Y. Supp. 460 ). 11. With reference to furnishing the workmen with boards and rubber gloves for their use, this may or may not have been the duty of the city.

Grigsby v. Miller

144 Or. 551 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1933

In this same resolution a board of viewers was appointed to determine the amount of damages to be awarded plaintiff by reason of his mortgage lien. … Justice Rand, speaking for the court in Foster v.

Fields v. Fields

139 Or. 41 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1931

*44 BROWN, J. The issue presented here concerns the intention of the testator in the disposition of his property as evidenced by his last will and testament. … To like effect, see Gildersleeve v. Lee, 100 Or. 578 ( 198 P. 246 , 36 A. L. R. 1166); Roots v. Knox, 107 Or. 96 ( 212 P. 469 , 213 P. 1013 ); Closset v. Burtchaell, 112 Or. 585 ( 230 P. 554 ).

Myrtle Point Mill & Lbr. Co v. Pike

104 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1922

The present action is based on the same subscription paper and issues similar to those involved in the case of Myrtle Point Mill & Lumber Co. v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Dodd v. State Industrial Accident Commission

211 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1957

Grunnett v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 108 Or 178, 185 , 215 P 881 ; Iwanicki v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 104 Or 650, 658 , 205 P 990 , 29 ALR 682 . … ORS 656.278 (2); Jacoby v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 165 Or 230, 234 , 106 P2d 294 ; Simmons v. State Ind. Acc. Com., supra; Garner v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 162 Or 256 , 92 P2d 193 .

State v. Montez

324 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1996

See Chapman v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).

BRINK ET UX v. Multnomah County

224 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1960

Hanns v. Friedly, 181 Or 681 , 184 P2d 855 (1947); Coos Bay Logging Co. v. Barclay, 159 Or 272 , 79 P2d 672 (1938); Smith v. Pallay et al., 130 Or 282 , 279 P 279 (1929); Daniels v. Northern Pac. Ry. … The property was first appraised by a board of viewers pursuant to ORS 368.480. The damages were fixed by the viewers at $5,725, which value was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners.

Grover v. Owens

222 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1960

“A At times there was a board set up on two by fours to get — after you get in the room. “Q Was there any board of that nature on March 8? … See Hunt v. Portland Baseball Club, 207 Or 337 , 296 P2d 495 .

Munson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

142 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1933

Walters v. Dock Commission, 126 Or. 487 ( 266 P. 634 , 270 P. 778 ). … In an earlier case, in the Matter of Grieb v. Hammerle, 222 N. Y. 382 ( 118 N. E. 805 , 7 A. L.

State v. Kelliher

49 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1907

By Section 3306 of the code it is provided that when the State Land Board accepts an application to purchase school land, “the State Land Board shall * * deliver to the purchaser a certificate that he has purchased the lands … E. 561 ); People v. Bird, 124 Cal. 32 ( 56 Pac. 639 ); People v. Whiteman, 114 Cal. 338 ( 46 Pac. 99 ). In People v.

Morford v. California Western States Life Insurance

166 Or. 575 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1941

Section 89, ibid, p. 158, citing Busher v. New York Life Ins. Co., 72 N. H. 551, 58 Atl. 41 ; Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 105 Okla. 136 , 232 P. 99 ; Hartford S. B. I. & Ins. Co. v. … Co. v. Curtis-Brown Co., supra; Riordan v. Equitable L. Assur. Soc., 31 Idaho 657 , 175 P. 586 .

Eastman v. Heisley

113 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1924

Brown a right of way to construct and maintain a tile drainage system across Lot No. 12, Brown’s Addition “A” to Silverton, Oregon, which lot was then owned by Brown in fee. … Garwood v. Garwood, 29 Cal. 514 .

Baker v. Federal Crop Ins. Corp.

241 Or. 609 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1965

Federal Housing Administration v. … In Maguire v. Federal Crop Ins.

Milos v. Covacevich

40 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1901

Frauds, § 231; Browne, St. Frauds (4 ed.), § 342a; Brabin v. Hyde, 32 N. Y. 519 ; Gorman v. Brossard, 120 Mich. 611 (79 N .W. 903); Norwegian Plow Co. v. Hanthorn, 71 Wis. 529 ( 37 N. W. 825 ). … Law (1 ed.), 1123, and notes; Conant v. Kimball’s Estate, 95 Wis. 550 ( 70 N. W. 74 ); Jackson v. Ely, 57 Ohio St. 450 ( 49 N. E. 792 ); James v. Bligh, 11 Allen, 4 ; Egleston v. Knickerbacker, 6 Barb. 458 ; Coon v.

Joseph v. Meier & Frank Co.

120 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1926

It is not available under the general issue: Knight v. Baker, 117 Or. 492 , 244 Pac. 543 ; Springer v. Jenkins, 47 Or. 502 ( 84 Pac. 479 ); Konigsberger v. Harvey, 12 Or. 286 ( 7 Pac. 114 ); Adair v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

MacLeay Estate Co. v. Curry County

127 Or. 356 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1927

In Stotts v. … And in Curtis v. LaGrande Water Co., 20 Or. 34 ( 23 Pac. 808 , 10 L. R.