Case law

Rosenau v. Lansing

113 Or. 638 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1924

McNary v. … Baxter, supra, is referred to with approval in the recent case of Orr v. Keith, 245 Mass. 35 ( 139 N. E. 508 ). The case of Cullum v.

Rogers v. State Accident Insurance Fund

289 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1980

Therefore, we take the opinion to mean that the Court of Appeals has made the same findings as the Workers’ Compensation Board, cf. Gettman v. … Accordingly, we reinstate the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Elwood v. State Accident Insurance

298 Or. 429 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1985

The referee and the Workers Compensation Board denied the claim. The Court of Appeals reversed and directed the board to order acceptance of the claim. Elwood v. SAIF, 67 Or App 134 , 676 P2d 922 (1984). … Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564 , 491 P2d 997 (1971).

Goodspeed v. Duby

131 Or. 275 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1929

Surety Co. v. John Davis Co., 244 U. S. 376 ; Dwyer v. U. S., 93 Fed. 616 ; Getschell & Martin Lbr. Co. v. Peters, 100 N. W. 550, 552 ; Holmes v. Standard, Oil Co., 55 N. E. 647 . … Brown, J., absent.

City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.

144 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1933

They are: In re Kariher’s Petition, supra; City of Muskegon Heights v. Danigelis, 253 Mich. 260 ( 235 N. W. 83 , 73 A. L. R. 696); Town Board of Greece v. Murray, 130 MisC. 55 (223 N. Y. … Palmberg v. Astoria, 63 Or. 222 ( 127 P. 32 ); State ex rel. v. Port of Bay Ocean, 65 Or. 506 ( 133 P. 85 ); Brown v. Carl, 111 Iowa 608 ( 82 N. W. 1033 ). However, as is stated in 9 R. C.

Fehl v. Martin

155 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1936

That section reads as follows: “Any person sentenced to serve an indeterminate sentence in the penitentiary may be paroled by the *456 governor upon Ms own motion, or upon the recommendation of the parole board, in accordance … Section 14 of Article V of the state constitution provides: “He [the governor] shall have power to grant reprieves, commutations, and pardons, after conviction, *458 for all offenses except treason, subject to such regulations

Shaveland v. Shaveland

112 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1924

BROWN, J. The defendant in this case pleads former adjudication as a bar to the further prosecution thereof. … In Runnells v. Leffel et al., 105 Or. 346 ( 207 Pac. 867 ), we quoted with approval the following from Barrett v.

Brayton & Lawbaugh v. Monarch Lumber Co.

87 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1917

Wilson, 13 Or. 514, 521 ( 11 Pac. 267 ); Holladay v. Holladay, 13 Or. 523, 530 ( 11 Pac. 260 , 12 Pac. 821 ). … If the mortgagee is committing waste and is insolvent, equitable relief may be necessary: Brundage v. Home Sav. & Loan Assn., 11 Wash. 277 ( 39 Pac. 666 ); Bolles v. Duff, 35 How. Pr. (N. Y.) 481.

Wilson & Hollenbeck v. U. S. Lumber & Box Co.

108 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1923

BROWN, J. This case presents no serious legal questions. The problems involved herein are problems of fact, and not of law. The law governing this case is well settled in this jurisdiction: Baker v. … It is settled law in this state that a motion for a nonsuit is, in effect, a demurrer to the evidence, and that such a motion admits all that the evidence proves or tends to prove: Brown v. Oregon Lbr.

Gabel v. Oliver

130 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1929

Careful reading of the testimony reveals that witness Evans was not asked whether or not he made a certain statement to defendant Oliver giving the time, place and persons present: State v. … Brown, J., absent.

Huber Et Ux. v. Portland Gas Coke Co.

128 Or. 363 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1929

BROWN, J. 1, 2. It is settled law that every unauthorized entry on land of another is a trespass, even if no damage is done; Kesterson v. California-Oregon Power Co., 114 Or. 22, 31 ( 228 Pac. 1092 ). … See the recent case of Gill v. Selling, 125 Or. 587 ( 267 Pac. 812 ), where this question is determined.

Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Department of Revenue

344 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 2008

This court has stated, “ ‘the use of a term in one section and not in another section of the same statute indicates a purposeful omission.’ ” Jordan v. SAIF, 343 Or 208, 217 , 167 P3d 451 (2007) (quoting PGE v. … See Vaughn v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Collins

308 Or. 66 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1989

See Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475, 479 , 632 P2d 782 (1981). … See, e.g., Hedin v. Cupp, 304 Or 66, 72-4 , 742 P2d 605 (1987).

Jackson v. Steinberg

186 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1948

“Treasure trove consists essentially of articles of gold and silver, intentionally hidden for safety in the earth or in some secret place, the owner being unknown. ’ ’ Brown: Personal Property, § 13. … Rep. 293 ; Heddle v. Bank of Hamilton, 17 B. C. 306, 6 B. R. C. 256, 259; Foulke v. N. Y. Consolidated R. Co., supra ( 228 N. Y. 269 , 127 N. E. 237 , 9 A. L. R. 1384, 1386, 1387); Silcott v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Tamblyn

298 Or. 620 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1985

Otherwise, the decision of the disciplinary board shall be final. * * *.” … Howat v. Kansas, 258 US 181, 189-190 , 66 L Ed 550 , 42 S Ct 277 (1922); Worden v.

Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.

191 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1951

Brown v. Harris and Gregory, 187 Or. 658, 660 , 213 P. 2d 176 ; Fritz v. Fritz, 179 Or. 612, 617 . 174 P. 2d 169 , and Oregon cases there cited. … Coker & Bellamy v. Richey, supra.

State v. Eisen

53 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1909

As held in State v. … Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473, 482 ( 88 Pac. 609 : 120 Am. St. Rep. 935 ).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lenske

269 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1974

OES 9.540 provided that the Board of Governors may make recommendations to this court in disciplinary matters. ⑥ The findings and recommendations by trial committees *165 appointed by the Board of Governors and by the Board … Both the trial committee and the Board of Governors have recommended that the accused be suspended from the practice of law for two years. We approve and adopt that recommendation. ① See Marx v.

Smith v. Enterprise Irrigation District

160 Or. 372 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1938

Co. v. Ochoco Irrigation District, 108 Or. 1, 53 , 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 . This case renders untenable the fourth ground suggested in support of said demurrer. … As to the relief sought herein, plaintiffs could not obtain it by an appeal to the board of equalization of defendant district.

Wallace v. McDaniel

59 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1911

Ed. 307 ), and Taylor v. Brown, 147 U. S. (40 Davis) 640 (13 Sup. Ct. 549: 37 L. Ed. 313 ). … The latter case (Taylor v. Brown, 147 U. S. (40 Davis) 640 (13 Sup. Ct. 549: 37 L.