Case law

Goodrich v. May

121 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1927

As stated in Commonwealth v. Sturtivant, 117 Mass. 122 ( 19 Am. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Herzog

324 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1996

924 P.2d 817 (1996) 324 Or. 294 STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Gary Kenneth HERZOG, Petitioner on Review. CC C890691CR, C890738CR, C890739CR; CA A66029 (Control), A66030, A66031; SC S41051. … The trial court held that that scientific technique satisfied the standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence articulated by the court in State v. Brown, 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984).

Fox v. Knight

221 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1960

Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged the exhaustion of their intra-union remedies as required by Way v. Patton, 195 Or 36, 45 , 241 P2d 895 . … Allen v. Southern Pac. Co., 166 Or 290 , 110 P2d 933 ; Louisville & N. R. Col. v. Miller, 219 Ind 389, 38 NE2d 239 , 142 ALR 1050 ; Shaup v. Grand Int’l Brotherhood, 223 Ala 205, 135 So 327.

Tripp and Saunders v. Renhard

184 Or. 622 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1948

fir logs, No. 3 grade, containing a total *631 of 11,111 board feet; and one No. 3 grade Ponderosa pine log containing 142 board feet. … From Canada Maple Exchange, Ltd. v. Scudder Syrup Co., 223 Ill.

Nickolopolus v. Frank

129 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1929

Evans, 21 Or. 309 ( 28 Pac. 67 ); Ah Doon v. Smith, 25 Or. 92 ( 34 Pac. 1093 ); Peterson v. Standard Oil Co., 55 Or. 511, 519 ( 106 Pac. 337 , Ann. Cas. 1912A, 625). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Wetmore v. Multnomah County

6 Or. 463 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

The board overruled the objections, and allowed the roll to stand as returned by the assessor. … (Ankeny v. Multnomah County, 3 Or. 386 .)

Peters v. Hockley

152 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1935

L. 1019; Patterson v. Howe, 102 Or. 275, 284 ( 202 P. 225 ); Cass v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co., (S. D.) 253 N. W. 626 ; Meyer v. Johnson, 224 Mo. App. 565 ( 30 S. W. (2d) 641 ); Willis v. City of Browning, 161 Mo. … Willis v. Browning, 161 Mo. App. 461 , 143 S. W. 516 ; Madison Coal Co. v. Altmire, 215 Ky. 283 , 284 S. W. 1068 . The Willis case is cited and apparently approved by the supreme court in Boyer v. Missouri Pac. R.

State v. B. Y.

371 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 2023

Eklof v. … See Dept. of Human Services v. S.J.M., 364 Or 37, 54, 430 P3d 1021 (2018) (exam- ining the juvenile code provision at issue in the context of the rest of the juvenile code); Brown v.

Ward v. James

84 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1917

The vendor and vendee stand in the relation of landlord and tenant: Frink v. Thomas, 20 Or. 265, 273 ( 25 Pac. 717 , 12 L. R. … Brown, 36 Or. 221 ( 56 Pac. 170 ), and cases there cited; McAlpine v. Reicheneker, 56 Kan. 100 ( 42 Pac. 339 ); Woodward v. Van Hoy, 45 Mo. 300 .

State v. Sanchez-Alfonso

352 Or. 790 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 2012

Brown, 297 Or 404, 687 P2d 751 (1984), State v. 15 O'Key, 321 Or 285, 899 P2d 663 (1995), and State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 16 (2009). … See Marcum v.

State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Circuit Court

114 Or. 6 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1924

Justice Brown in Davis v. … In State ex rel. v.

Blomquist v. Jennings

119 Or. 691 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1926

It is entitled .to every reasonable intendment: Rottig v. Polsky, 101 Or. 530 ( 201 Pac. 188 ). … Brown & Co. v. Duda, 91 Or. 402 ( 179 Pac. 253 ); Riddle State Bank v. Link, 78 Or. 498 ( 153 Pac. 1192 ); Smith v. Campbell, 85 Or. 420 ( 166 Pac. 546 ); Barbre v. Goodale, 28 Or. 465 ( 38 Pac. 671 , 43 Pac. 378 ).

Eddy v. Kincaid

28 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1895

State v. Simon, 20 Or. 365 ( 26 Pac. 170 ); Gosman v. State, 106 Ind. 203 ( 6 N. E. 319 ); State v. Harrison, 113 Ind. 435 ( 3 Am. St. Rep. 663 , 16 N. E. 384 ); State v. Howe, 25 Ohio St. 588 ( 18 Am. … The author cites, in support of this position, Akers v. State, 8 Ind. 484 ; Thompson v. State, 37 Miss. 518 ; State v. Wells, 8 Nev. 105 ; United States v. Jameson, 3 McCrary, 620 ; *562 Mayor v. Horn, 2 Harr.

Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.

117 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1926

BROWN, J. The plaintiff brought this action as administratrix of the estate of Walter Cooper, deceased. … For a further statement of the facts involved herein, see the case of Sadie Cooper v. North Coast Power Co., a Corporation, and George Ringle (Or.), 244 Pac. 665 , a companion case, decided this day.

Dement v. Eastes

124 Or. 170 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1928

Washburn, 29 Or. 150 ( 44 Pac. 390 ), and Henry v. Hand, 36 Or. 492 ( 59 Pac. 330 ). … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

McComb v. Cogswell

140 Or. 676 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1932

Wolke v. Schmidt, 112 Or. 99 ( 228 P. 921 ); De Young v. Crooks, 124 Or. 19 ( 263 P. 918 ); Turner v. Jackson, 139 Or. 539 ( 4 P. (2d) 925 , 11 P. (2d) 1048 ). … Rand, Brown, and Belt, JJ., concur.

Kovachoff v. St. Johns Lumber Co.

61 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1912

Ordinarily they were kept protected by boards two inches thick fastened in place in front of the gearing on top of which was another two-inch board which afforded ample protection when it was in place. … In Mast v. Kern, 84 Or. 247 ( 54 Pac. 950 : 75 Am. St.

Providence Memorial Ass'n v. Providence Missionary Baptist Church

241 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1965

. *199 “Q When I’m saying you, I mean the board and you were part of that board? “A That’s right. … Rodgers et ux v. Reimann et ux, 227 Or 62 , 361 P2d 101 . The plaintiff was a prior purchaser of land from the common grantor.

Farley v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.

203 Or. 635 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1955

The base of the platform was formed by two-by-fours laid flat with a wooden frame of three-fourths inch boards placed on top of the two-by-fours. … Around the base of the platform, and covering the edge of the boards was an aluminum strip three-fourths of an inch in width.

Nelson v. McAllister District Improvement Co.

155 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1936

The transactions referred to are within the *108 rule announced in State Land Board v. … State Land Board.