Case law

Jacobs Bros. & Co. v. Ervin

9 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

(Clark v. Flint, 22 Pick., 243 ; Griffin v. Marquardt, 17 N. Y., 29 ; Vanheusen and Charles v. Radcliff, Id., 584; Yeatman v. Savings Institution, 95 U. S., 766 ; Story’s Eq. Jur., 1,228, 1,229.) … (Burrell on Assignments, 358; Browning v. Curtis, 10 Paige, 210 ; Browning v. White, 6 Barbour S. C. R., 91; Leach v. Kelsey, 7 Id., 466.)

Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

294 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1982

Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. Kuhn, 270 Md 496, 312 A2d 216 (1973) (dictum); People v. Ellis, 57 Ill 2d 127, 311 NE2d 98 (1974); Darrin v. Gould, 85 Wash 2d 859, 540 P2d 882 (1975); Page v. … Compare Cleveland Board of Education v.

State v. Eliśalda

280 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1977

The decision of the Court of Appeals ( 30 Or App 193 , July 18,1977) is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.

Kleinschmidt v. MATTHIEU

201 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1954

That such an action will lie is sustained by the following authorities: Harris v. Nashville Trust Co., (1914), 128 Tenn 573, 162 SW 584 ; Brown v. … This reasoning is fallacious in that the publication of the will, as we have held, antedates the probate thereof. *412 In Brown v.

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reuter

294 Or. 446 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1983

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). *449 In order to invoke the provisions of ORS 28.010 et seq., 1 a justiciable controversy must exist. Oregon Medical Assn. v. … Davidson v.

Dibert v. Giebisch

74 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1914

In Trepannier v. Cote, 207 Mass. 484, 486 ( 93 N. … The case of De Sandro v.

Kelley v. Stout Lumber Co.

123 Or. 647 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1928

The first part of this instruction is approved in Elliff v. Oregon R. & N. Co., 53 Or. 66 ( 99 Pac. 76 ); Palmer v. Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., 56 Or. 262 ( 108 Pac. 211 ); Doyle v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Lawrence v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.

91 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1919

Co. v. Lindeman, 143 Fed. 946 ( 75 C. C. A. 18 ); Moffitt v. Connecticut Co., 86 Conn. 527 ( 86 Atl. 16 ). The latter case is cited by plaintiff in support of his theory. … A. 663); Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co., 43 Or. 4 ( 72 Pac. 324 ); Ahonen v. Hryszko, 90 Or. 451 ( 175 Pac. 616 ). The defendant pleads the negligence of the plaintiff and offered evidence in support of the plea.

Clarke-Woodward Drug Co. v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co.

75 Or. 234 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1915

Chief Justice Lord, in Black v. … Brown, 102 Ga. 87 ( 29 S. E. 149 , 66 Am. St. Rep. 156 ). 3, 4.

Wyckoff v. Mayfield

130 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1929

There is no pretense that Rogue River is navigable at the place in dispute: Minto v. Delaney, 7 Or. 337 ; Micelli v. … Brown, J., absent.

Coman v. Corrections Department

327 Or. 449 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1998

An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied petitioner access to the records, a divided Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed that ruling, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the Board without opinion. … The order of the Workers’ Compensation Board is reversed.

Hellbusch v. Rheinholdt

275 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1976

Log Co. v. C. & N. R. R. R., 146 Or 461, 471 , 30 P2d 1047 , 86 ALR 1228 (1934); ORS 41.270. The question of determining the custom or usage is for the trier of facts. Andrews Equip. Service v. … «Sjí jf: » The evidence shows that plaintiff was registered with the Builder’s Board as Hellbusch Construction Co.

White v. Savage

48 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1906

This is not a ease where the plaintiff as surety claims to have been discharged in full or pro tanto by some act of the creditor detrimental to his rights as surety, as are the cases of Brown v. … And in Galloway v.

Hammer v. Downing

39 Or. 504 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1901

To the same purpose, see Dawson v. Dillon, 26 Mo. 395 . 6. … Co. v. Johnson, 13 Colo. 258 ( 22 Pac. 459 , 5 L.R. A. 769).

Sprague v. Astoria

106 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1922

BROWN, J. Jurisdiction is the authority to hear and determine a legal controversy. … Pike, 17 Or. 330 ( 20 Pac. 685 ); Emery v. Brown, 63 Or. 264 ( 127 Pac. 682 ); Chandler v. Todd, 95 Or. 430 ( 188 Pac. 161 ); Russell v. Smith, 96 Or. 629 ( 190 Pac. 715 ).

Greenwood Products, Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Products, Inc.

351 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 2012

Knepper v. Brown, 345 Or 320, 323 , 195 P3d 383 (2009). … Card v.

Wilson v. Wasco County

83 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1917

In State ex rel. v. … See also Howland v. Board of Supervisors, 109 Cal. 152 ( 41 Pac. 864 ); Tinkel v. Griffin et al., 26 Mont. 426 ( 68 Pac. 859 ); Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. Trimble, 104 Ky. 629 ( 47 S. W. 773 , 42 L. R.

Smith v. Employment Division

310 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1990

Employment Div. v. Smith, supra. … The decisions of the Court of Appeals are reversed, and the final orders of the Employment Appeals Board are affirmed.

Kummer v. Lauman

138 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1932

It was shown *517 that defendant Brown was in possession of the mortgaged property. … In the case of Benn v.

Providence Memorial Ass'n v. Providence Missionary Baptist Church

241 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1965

. *199 “Q When I’m saying you, I mean the board and you were part of that board? “A That’s right. … Rodgers et ux v. Reimann et ux, 227 Or 62 , 361 P2d 101 . The plaintiff was a prior purchaser of land from the common grantor.