Case law

Hibernia Securities Co. v. Pirie

149 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1934

In United States ex rel. v. Knox, 102 U. S. 422 ( 26 L. … In the case of Schwenker v. Bekkedal, 204 Wis. 546 ( 236 N.

Balfour v. Burnett

28 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1895

In Leese v. … Barney, 5 Or. 211 ; Bank of British Columbia v. Paige, 7 Or. 455 ; Leinenweber v. Brown, 24 Or. 548 ( 34 Pac. 475 ); Bays v. Trulson, 25 Or. 109 ( 35 Pac. 26 ).

Thompson v. Connell

31 Or. 231 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1897

Taaffe, 29 Cal. 422 ; 1 Black on Judgments, § 354; Lovejoy v. Willamette Locks Company, 24 Or. 569 ( 34 Pac. 660 ); Askren v. Squire, 29 Or. 228 ( 45 Pac. 779 ); Willett v. Millman, 61 Iowa 123 ( 15 N. … Other authorities attest the availability of such a ground of relief by motion to vacate in the original action: See Binsse v. Barker, 13 N. J. Law 263 ( 23 Am. Dec. 720 ); Browning v. Roane, 9 Ark. 354 ( 1 Am.

Hills v. Pierce

113 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

BROWN, J. … Cas. 1916E, 1022); Marlowe v. Commonwealth, 142 Ky. 106 ( 133 S. W. 1137 ); Mill v. Brown, 31 Utah, 473 ( 88 Pac. 609 , 120 Am. St. Rep. 935 , and note).

Chapman v. Wilbur

4 Or. 362 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1873

Warren v. The Mayor of Lyons City ( 22 Iowa, 351 ) is another case relied upon by counsel for appellant. … The same doctrine is well expressed in Barclay v. Howell's Lessee ( 6 Peters, 507 ).

State v. Montez

309 Or. 564 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1990

Defendant cites numerous reasons why Brown should have been excused for cause, but none of them required that Brown be excused as a matter of law. … Nothing in Brown’s voir dire indicates that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to excuse Brown for cause.

Kohanek v. Rudie Wilhelm Warehouse Co.

129 Or. 642 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1929

BROWN, J. … A case wherein a like situation is presented is the case of Rugenstein v.

State v. Hammelsy

52 Or. 156 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1908

Rex v. Story, R. R. C. C. 80. … Wasservogle, 77 Cal. 173 ( 19 Pac. 270 ) ; Commonwealth v. Drew, 19 Pick. (Mass.) 179; note to Barton v. People, 25 Am. Rep. 375 -380. The Texas cases, Ayers v. State, 37 Tex. Crim. Rep. 1 ( 38 S. W. 792 ), Brown v.

Maffett v. Thompson

32 Or. 546 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1898

Cas. 1027 ); Wetmore v. Fiske, 15 R. I. 354 ( 5 Atl. 375 , and 10 Atl. 627 , 629); Markell v. Kasson, 31 Fed. 104 ; Dewees v. Dewees, 55 Miss. 315 . … The same principle has been held to obtain under the code practice of some of the states: Worrell v. Wade’s Heirs, 17 Iowa, 96 ; Russell v. Lamb, 82 Iowa, 558 ( 48 N. W. 939 ); Jones v. Thacker, 61 Ga. 329 ; Mott v.

Bileu v. Paisley

4 L.R.A. 840 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1889

Citing Wells v. Howell, 19 Johns. 385 ; 1 Chit. Pl. 94, 95; Brown on Actions at Law, 369. … Brown v. Lent, 20 Vt. 529 .

DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. Crook County

351 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2011

267 P.3d 158 (2011) 351 Or. 318 DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. CROOK COUNTY. No. (S059708). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 10, 2011. Petition for Review Allowed. … The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or. 219 , 264 P.3d 1265 (2011).

Aitkenhead v. Holmes

126 Or. 8 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1928

R. 1108); Pugsley v. Smyth, 98 Or. 448, 467 ( 194 Pac. 686 ); Roberts v. Cohen, 104 Or. 177, 189 ( 206 Pac. 295 ). Only a question of fact is presented upon this appeal. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Farley v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.

203 Or. 635 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1955

The base of the platform was formed by two-by-fours laid flat with a wooden frame of three-fourths inch boards placed on top of the two-by-fours. … Around the base of the platform, and covering the edge of the boards was an aluminum strip three-fourths of an inch in width.

Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of Phoenix

Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2015

Brown v. Brown, 206 Or App 239, 248, 136 P3d 745 (2006), rev den, 341 Or 449 (2006) (internal quotation and cita- tion omitted); see also Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. … ORCP 23 B; Navas v.

Multnomah County v. Mittleman

275 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1976

Kadderly v. … Roy v.

Jacobs Bros. & Co. v. Ervin

9 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

(Clark v. Flint, 22 Pick., 243 ; Griffin v. Marquardt, 17 N. Y., 29 ; Vanheusen and Charles v. Radcliff, Id., 584; Yeatman v. Savings Institution, 95 U. S., 766 ; Story’s Eq. Jur., 1,228, 1,229.) … (Burrell on Assignments, 358; Browning v. Curtis, 10 Paige, 210 ; Browning v. White, 6 Barbour S. C. R., 91; Leach v. Kelsey, 7 Id., 466.)

Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

294 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1982

Maryland State Board of Barber Examiners v. Kuhn, 270 Md 496, 312 A2d 216 (1973) (dictum); People v. Ellis, 57 Ill 2d 127, 311 NE2d 98 (1974); Darrin v. Gould, 85 Wash 2d 859, 540 P2d 882 (1975); Page v. … Compare Cleveland Board of Education v.

Matter of Sawyer

286 Or. 369 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 1979

In Monaghan v. … People ex rel Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board v. Hartel, 72 Ill 2d 225, 380 NE2d 801 (1978).

Northwest Steel Co. v. School Dist. No. 16

76 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1915

The first reported case under this statute is that of Owen v. Hill, 67 Mich. 43 ( 34 N. … The leading Minnesota case is that of Ihk v. Duluth City, 58 Minn. 182 ( 59 N. W. 960 ).

Straube v. Larson

287 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1979

of Directors (board) of the hospital. … In Lantis v.