Case law

Hall v. State

355 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 30, 2014

Dunn v. City of Milwaukie, 355 Or 339, 346 , 328 P3d 1261 (2014); see also Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142-43 , 117 P3d 990 (2005) (discussing the term “taking”). … Dunn, 355 Or at 348 ; Coast Range Conifers, 339 Or at 146-47 ; Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 325 Or 185, 197-98 , 935 P2d 411 (1997).

Blakeley v. First National Bank

151 Or. 655 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1935

In Huddelson v. … The court cited Banfield v. Crispen, supra; Patty v. Salem Flouring Mills, 53 Or. 350 ( 96 P. 1106 , 98 P. 251 , 100 P. 298 ); Rugh v. Soleim, 92 Or. 329 *662 ( 180 P. 930 ); First National Bank v.

General Insurance Co. of America v. Earle

156 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1937

By providing for distribution to the holders of such participating policies of such sums of money out of the earnings of the company as in the judgment of its board of directors is proper, in violation of section 46-141, … In construing statutes containing the same terms as are written into our statute, the supreme court of the State of Ohio, in State ex rel. v. Conn, 110 Ohio St. 404 ( 144 N.

Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. Northwestern Long Distance Telephone Co.

88 Or. 666 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1918

Cohen v. … The following cases treat of the duties of such boards of *681 officers: Wardell v. Union Pacific R. R. Co., 103 U. S. 651 ( 26 L. Ed. 509 ); McGourkey v. Toledo etc. R. Co., 146 U. S. 536 ( 36 L. Ed. 1079 , 13 Sup. Ct.

Levine v. Levine

121 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1927

That *46 judgment was reversed upon appeal, Levine v. … J., and Brown and Bean, JJ., concur.

Phez Co. v. Salem Fruit Union

113 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1924

Rep. 470 ); Second National Bank v. Grand Lodge, 98 U. S. 123 ( 25 L. Ed. 75 , see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes); Pardee v. Treat, 82 N. Y. 385 ; Berry v. Brown, 107 N. Y. 659 ( 14 N. E. 289 ). In 13 C. … Brown, J., concurs. Burnett, J., concurs in the result.

Redden v. Myers

266 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1973

Bazett v. Myers, 265 Or 122 , 508 P2d 199 (1973). … See Bazett v. Myers, supra, 265 Or at 124-5 , 508 P2d at 200 ; Rogers v. Myers, 252 Or 656 , 452 *326 P2d 302 (1969).

Hobson Et Ux. v. Beall

130 Or. 240 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1929

Assessments unmatured or not due are not liens or encumbrances within the meaning of the law: Hoge v. Garcia (Tex. Civ. App.), 296 S. W. 982 ; Condit v. Johnson, 158 Iowa, 209 ( 139 N. W. 477 ); Pate v. Banks, 178 N. … Brown, J., absent.

State v. Boag

154 Or. 354 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1936

State v. *361 Brown, 38 Kan. 390 , 16 P. 259 , 8 Am. Crim. Rep. 165.” (Mr. Justice Wiest in People v. Townsend, supra.) … (Cicero Brown v. Commonwealth, M. S. Opinion November 15th, 1879) ”. Trimble v. Com., 78 Ky. 176 . Speaking through the late Mr.

Hughes v. Holman

23 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1893

So, in Kingery v. … So, in People v. Livingstone, 79 N.

Moss Mercantile Co. v. First Nat. Bank

47 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1905

J.), 10 Atl. 606 ; Fisher v. Lord, Fed. Cas. No. 4821; Ferguson v. Fisk, 28 Conn. 501 . … Wallace, 19 Ala. 219 ; Peyser v. Wilcox, 64 How. Prac. 525 ; Sims v. Brown, 6 Thomp. & C. 5; s. c., affirmed 64 N. Y. 660 .

State ex rel. School Dist. No. 8 v. Goff

110 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1924

The authorities are collated in Brady v. Gilman, 96 Minn. 434 ( 104 N. W. 897 , 13 Am. St. Rep. 622 , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 835 and notes). For instance, it is said in First Nat. Bank v. Burkhardt, 100 U. S. 686 ( 25 L. … This principle is discussed in State v.

Title Trust Co. v. Aylsworth

40 Or. 20 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1901

In Strode v. … People, 86 Ill. 288 ; Crane v. City of Janesville, 20 Wis. 305 ; Hamilton v.

Luckey v. Thompson

69 Or. 125 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1914

of the rulings made by the boards as to residence, 19; (4) persons who went to polls to vote, but heard from persons, other than members of *127 board, how the boards were ruling on the question of residence, 3; (5) persons … The contention of plaintiff is that, where a body of voters is denied the privilege as a class, when numerous enough to have changed the result, the election is rendered invalid; and he relies upon the case of Coggeshall v.

Nelson v. Dowgiallo

73 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1914

Frazer, 15 Or. 638 ( 16 Pac. 869 ); Stokes v. Brown, 20 Or. 530 ( 26 Pac. 561 ); Denn v. Peters, 36 Or. 486 ( 59 Pac. 1109 ); Creecy v. Joy, 40 Or. 28 ( 66 Pac. 295 ); Wehrung v. … A lease of the property described in the complaint would carry the buildings located upon it: Harrington v. Watson, 11 Or. 143 ( 3 Pac. 173 , 50 Am. Rep. 465 ).

State v. Remington

50 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1907

In Adams v. … In People v.

Brice Mortgage Co. v. WODTKE

215 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1958

In an unbroken line of cases commencing with Brown v. … See Alderson v. Lee, 52 Or 92 , 96 P 234 ; Loud v. Gold Ray Realty Co., 72 Or 155 , 142 P 785 ; McKinley v. Tice, 129 Or 190 , 276 P 1110 ; and Phillips v. Graves, 139 Or 336 , 9 P2d 490 . In Phillips v.

Oregon Mutual Life Insurance v. James

166 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1941

Brown, of the insurance company, and stated to him that he wanted to change the beneficiary in the policy herein mentioned, and Mr. Brown said that the change could not be made because of the condition of the insured. … It is a judicial determination: Folts v. Jones, supra, Pendas v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 129 Fla. 253 , 176 So. 104 , 112 A. L. R. 1051; McCartney v. Jacobs, 288 Ill. 568 , 123 N. E. 557 , 4 A. L.

Lee v. Paulsen

273 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1975

In Ramstead v. … Mick v.

Walker v. Sutherland

133 Or. 457 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1930

See Wemme v. Hurlburt , also decided this day. Plaintiff in the case at bar relies on the case of Re George Teeters , habeas corpus, 130 Or. 631 ( 280 P. 660 ). … BROWN and ROSSMAN, JJ., concur.