Case law

WITHERS v. Reed

194 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1952

State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or 431, 439 , 165 P 372 . … Thus, in State Land Board v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. State Tax Commission

228 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961

Board denied said appeals. … Such is the holding in the cases cited by the Petitioners, to-wit: State v. Jemez Land Co., (N.M.) 226 P 890 ; City of Newark v. Timer, (N.J.) 170 A 37; Robinson v.

Hunter v. Allen

174 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1944

A.; Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Roberts v. Templeton, 48 Or. 65 , 80 P. 481 , 3 L. R. A. (N.S.) 790; Tonseth v. Larsen, 69 Or. 387 , 138 P. 1080 ; Le Vee v. Le Vee, 93 Or. 370 , 181 P. 351 ; McCormick’s Appeal, 57 Pa. … Brown v. Lord, supra ( 7 Or. 302 ); Le Vee v. *282 Le Vee, supra ( 93 Or. 370 , 181 P. 351 ); Brennen v. Derby, supra ( 124 Or. 574 , 265 P. 425 ); Magness v. Magness, supra ( 148 Or. 44 , 33 P. (2d) 1005 ); Losey v.

Oregon Railroad v. Umatilla County

47 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1905

The object of the writ, says this court in Garnsey v. … Douglas County, 4 Or. 388 ; Woodworth v. Gibbs, 61 Iowa, 398 ( 16 N. W. 287 ); Knapp v. Heller, 32 Wis. 467 . 9.

French v. C. F. & T. Co.

124 Or. 686 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1928

BROWN, J. It should not be necessary to state that this is not a suit for an accounting. However, the word “accounting” is mentioned in two places in the record before us. … Bush, 35 Or. 114 ( 56 Pac. 646 ); Stacy v. McNicholas, 76 Or. 167 ( 144 Pac. 96 , 148 Pac. 67 ); Anderson v. Robinson, 63 Or. 236 ( 126 Pac. 988 , 127 Pac. 546 ); Scandinavian-American Bank v. Wentworth Lbr.

Dober v. Ukase Investment Co.

139 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1932

*629 BROWN, J. In order to justify its claim of right to possession of the property sought to be recovered by the plaintiff, the defendant herein asserts that the property was abandoned by the plaintiff. … See, also, Watts v. Spencer, 51 Or. 262 ( 94 P. 39 ). In Huffman v. Smyth, 47 Or. 573 ( 84 P. 80 , 114 Am. St. Rep. 938 , 8 Ann.

State v. Richards

361 Or. 840 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2017

Assn. v. Sch. Dist., 290 Or 217, 228, 621 P2d 547 (1980). … White v. Jubitz Corp., 347 Or 212, 223P3d 566 (2009); see also State v.

Gugler v. Baker County Education Service District

305 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1988

Plaintiffs allege that the structures of defendant’s board of directors under ORS 334.025(3) and budget committee under ORS 334.240(1) violate the constitutional one-person, one-vote principle. See Hadley v. … See Lewis v. Dept. of Rev., 294 Or 139, 143 , 653 P2d 1265 (1982); State ex rel Eckles v. Livermore, 72 Or App 650, 661-62 , 696 P2d 1153 (1985).

Raymond v. Coffey

5 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1873

(Opdyke v. Stephens, 4 Dutcher, 89; Brown v. Willey, 42 Penn. St. 205; Waterman v. Johnson, 13 Pick, 261; Blake v. … (Baker v. Talbot, 6 Monroe, 180.)

Columbia County v. Massie

31 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1897

And again in County Board of Education v. Bateman, 102 N. C. 52 ( 11 Am. St. Rep. 708 , 8 S. … In addition to these adjudications, the following decisions and authorities therein cited may also be referred to as bearing upon this discussion, and fully supporting the doctrine announced: Board of Supervisors v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith

316 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1993

In Ramstead, v. … “Statements made before various administrative boards and commissions have been recognized as absolutely privileged.” 219 at 388 (citations omitted).

Crawford v. Albany Ice Co.

36 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1900

E. 408 ); Leggett v. New Jersey Mfg. & Bank. Co. 1 N. J. Eq. 541 ( 23 Am. Dec. 728 ); Dabney v. Stevens, 40 How. Prac. 341 . … E. 635 ); Howe v. Keeler, 27 Conn. 538 . Where, as in Finnegan v.

Lombard v. Paulus

296 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 22, 1984

Pacific Power & Light v. Paulus, 292 Or 826, 830 , 643 P2d 871 (1982). … Authorizes Oregon residents contributing $5 minimum to board to vote for members of board. Establishes eligibility requirements and limits contributions and expenditures for board candidates.

Boise-Payette Lumber Co. v. Dominican Sisters of Ontario & German American Trust Co.

102 Or. 314 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1921

BROWN, J. At the beginning, we shall observe that we.are not deciding whether the defendant is liable to plaintiff in an action at law for the building material furnished by plaintiff and used in the construction of St. … The right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien is a statutory privilege: Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 89 . This privilege may be exercised or waived, as the lienor may prefer: Hughes v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Curry

297 Or. 504 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1984

One of those cases was Bracke v. Baza’r, supra. … Baza’r, 294 Or 483 , 658 P2d 1158 (1983), that we could not award attorney fees for work done at the Supreme Court level. 3 The other cases were Paresi v. SAIF, 62 Or App 139 , 660 P2d 684 (1983), and Teel v.

Jones v. State Tax Commission

214 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 1958

Pierce v. … To comply with this section the officer is invested with all the powers of the assessor, board of equalization and county clerk under the laws in force dining the above-stated five year period and thereafter.

State v. Guglielmo

46 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1905

It has been repeatedly held in this State that the form of indictment given in the statute was sufficient: State v. Dodson, 4 Or. 64 ; State v. Spencer, 6 Or. 152 ; State v. Brown, 7 Or. 186 ; State v. … The King, 6 Brown, Parl. Cases, 345; United States v. Tureaud (C. C.), 20 Fed. 621 .

Arp v. Kerrigan

287 Or. 73 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1979

Willamette-Western Corp. v. Lowry, 279 Or 525, 534 , 568 P2d 1339 (1977); Ireland v. Mitchell, 226 Or 286, 292 , 359 P2d 894 (1961). … See Barrett v. Brown, 261 Or 463, 472 , 495 P2d 733 (1972), and *91 Ballou v. Blitz-Weinhard Co., 246 Or 179, 180 , 424 P2d 225 (1967).

State v. Arenas

253 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1969

[2] In State v. … Browne and Fort, In Re Gault — Its Impact in Oregon, 5 Willamette L.J. 1 (1968).

Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic Bishop

107 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1923

This is the doctrine taught in Avery v. Butler, supra, and in all like cases. … Bean, Brown and McCotjrt, JJ., concur.