Case law

Red Top Taxi Co. v. Cooper

123 Or. 610 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1928

To apply the doctrine announced in Ramp v. … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

T. R. v. Boy Scouts of America

344 Or. 282 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 2008

Canton v. Harris, 489 US 378, 388-89 , 109 S Ct 1197 , 103 L Ed 2d 412 (1989); see also Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 US 397, 407 , 117 S Ct 1382 , 137 L Ed 2d 626 (1997) (citing Canton). … See Brown v. J. C.

Getchell v. Walker

129 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1929

L., §§ 4324 and 4325; McKennon v. Warnick, above; Wyman v. Noonday Mining Co., 100 Or. 211 ( 197 Pac. 289 ); Studley v. Luse, 89 Or. 338 ( 173 Pac. 1182 ); Creason v. … Brown, J., did not participate.

Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Department of Revenue

310 Or. 651 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1990

Franklin Savings and Loan v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 260 (1989). … Franklin Savings and Loan v. Dept. of Rev., supra, 11 OTR at 262 .

Frasure v. Agripac, Inc.

290 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

Agripac appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Board. … This finding was adopted by the Board. 5 ORS 656.265(5) requires the employer to raise "the issue of failure to give notice * * * at the first hearing on a claim for compensation * * 6 Bennett v.

State v. Perry

77 Or. 453 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1915

Brown, 73 Or. 325 ( 144 Pac. 444 ), and cases cited. … Justice Wolverton, in Clemmensen v.

School District No. 35 v. Holden

78 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1915

Justice Eakin, in Riggs v. … In this respect the case in hand is easily differentiated from such as Cooke v. Portland, 69 Or. 572 ( 139 Pac. 1095 ); Thurber v. McMinnville, 63 Or. 410 ( 128 Pac. 43 ); McKeon v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Gillis

297 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1984

The Disciplinary Review Board found that neither Gillis nor Carstens had violated the rule because the communication in question was not on the merits of the cause. The Disciplinary Review Board cited In re Bernard K. … Taylor Corp. v. Oregon L. & T. Co., 116 Or. 440 (241P. 388).” 1 The statement, as made in Muellhaupt , is probably dictum, but it was made.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Porter

268 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1974

Starr v. Brotherhood’s Relief and Compensation Fund, 268 Or 66 , 518 P2d 1321 (1974); State v. Wilcox, 216 Or 110, 116-17 , 337 P2d 797 (1959). … See Craig v. Harney, 331 US 367 , 67 S Ct 1249 , 91 L Ed 1546 (1947); *425 Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 US 331 , 66 S Ct 1029 , 90 L Ed 1295 (1946); Bridges v.

Bickham v. REYNOLDS ET UX

224 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1960

The plaintiff continued to use these back stairs, either by stepping carefully on the loose board or by stepping entirely over it. … Lusco v. Jackson, 27 Ala App 531, 175 So 566; Pena v. Stewart, 78 Ariz 272, 278 P2d 892 ; Margolen v. de Haan, 226 Ill App 110; Bailey v. First Realty Co., 305 Mass 306, 25 NE2d 712 ; Lopes v.

Rosenthal Bros. v. Kahn Bros.

19 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1890

Riddle v. Varum, 20 Pick. 280 ; Wilkinson v. Holiday, 33 Mich. 386 ; Benjamin on Sales, § 319; Baker on Sales, § 299; Fuller v. Bean, 34 N. H. 290; Stone v. Peacock, 35 Me. 388 ; Graff v. Fitch, 58 Ill. 373 ; 1 Gibbs v. … Lingham v. Eggleston, 27 Mich. 324 ; Hatch v. Standard Oil Co., 100 U. S. 131 ; Callaghan v. Myers, 89 Ill. 566 ; Benj. on Sales, 239.

State v. Gherasim

329 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1999

State v. Gherasim, 153 Or App 313 , 956 P2d 1054 (1998). We affirm. … See Yundt v. D & D Bowl, Inc., 259 Or 247, 256 , 486 P2d 553 (1971) (explaining standard of review); see also Madrid v.

Central Oregon Irrigation District v. Deschutes County

168 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1942

See: Goodwin & Co. v. Buckley, 54 Cal. 295 ; Ex parte Sohncke, 148 Cal. 262 , 82 P. 956 , 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 813, 113 Am. St. Rep. 236 , 7 Ann. Cas. 475; State v. Schenk, 238 Mo. 429 , 142 S. W. 263 ; Duke v. … American Casualty Company, 130 Wash. 210 , 226 P. 501 ; and Dewey v. City of Des Moines, 101 Iowa 416 , 70 N. W. 605 . Section 86-143, O. C. L.

Hale v. Port of Portland

308 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1989

See, e.g., Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 100 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); Deras v. … Perkins v. State, 252 Ind 549, 551, 251 NE2d 30, 32 (1969). 6 It remains to be determined what purpose Article IV, section 24, was intended to serve. The Oregon Constitution allocates power. See Brown v.

Chandler v. Todd

95 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1920

Appellant had thirty days from June 20, 1918, or until July 20, 1918, to file the transcript: Cauldwell v. Bingham & Shelley Co., 84 Or. 257, 260 ( 155 Pac. 190 , 163 Pac. 827 ). … Brown, 63 Or. 264 ( 127 Pac. 682 ). Section 554, subdivision 3, L. O.

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Wittemyer

328 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1999

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had committed all the alleged violations and determined that the appropriate sanction was suspension from the practice of law for four months. … See, e.g., Brown, 326 Or at 599 (finding client’s belief of existence of lawyer-client relationship reasonable under similar circumstances).

State v. Nutter

119 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1926

BROWN, J. The testimony offered by the State consisted of both direct and circumstantial evidence. … Furthermore, this court has held that alcohol is a substance deleterious to health, and, in fact, a poison: Hoefler v.

Castro v. State Accident Insurance Fund

290 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1981

The Workers’ Compensation Board found likewise and also found "Neither is there any clear-cut evidence that claimant was actually harassed by his supervisors.” … The Court of Appeals’ citation of James v. SAIF, supra, indicates it did not make such an implied finding. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals to proceed in accordance with our opinion in James v.

Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State

353 Or. 170 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 2013

The Supreme Court explained the rationale for that rule in Labor Board v. … ERB took guidance from cases decided by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the federal act on which PECBA was modeled. Elvin v.

Suitor v. First National Bank

126 Or. 456 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1928

Rep. 787 ); Winfield v. Beaver Trust Co., 229 Pa. 530 ( 79 Atl. 138 ). … Branch v. Lambert, 103 Or. 423, 434 ( 205 Pac. 995 ).