Case law

State ex rel Union Iron Works v. P. S. Lord Mechanical Contractors

250 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1968

On that date the Board received a report from an officer of the Board that the officer and other responsible representatives of the Board had inspected the work of the prime contractor, Lord, and had accepted it subject to … Dist. v. Gen. Ins. Co., 1965, 240 Or 103 , 399 P2d 351 .

Lucas v. Kaylor

136 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1931

As to stating the facts to the officer, it was a controverted question which was for the determination of the jury: Marshall v. Brown, 108 Or. 658, 662 ( 218 P. 923 ). Mr. … This question is answered in the case of Marshall v. Brown, supra, by the language of Mr.

Blust v. Pacific Telephone Co.

48 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1906

Co. 4 Or. 52; Scott v. Oregon Ry. & Nav. Co. 14 Or. 211 ( 13 Pac. 98 ); Brown v. Oregon Lum. Co. 24 Or. 315 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Tucker v. Northern Term. Co. 41 Or. 82 ( 68 Pac. 426 ); Greene v. Western Union Tel. Co. (C. … Chief Justice Lord, in Brown v. Oregon Lum.

Demco Development Corp. v. Department of Revenue

280 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1977

for our purposes provides as follows: "* * * The failure to give any notice as provided for in this section shall not invalidate the assessment, and in such case the taxpayer, without having first petitioned the county board … Department of Revenue, 261 Or 305 , 493 P2d 1372 (1973), and Johnson v. Tax Commission, 248 Or 460 , 435 P2d 302 (1967). See, also, Cascade Manor, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 5 OTR 482 (1974); Proud Truck Sales v.

Hickman v. Six Dimension Custom Homes, Inc.

273 Or. 894 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1975

In response to defendant’s application for a variance, the Board of Adjustment held a hearing, at which plaintiffs appeared and which resulted in the board’s denying defendant’s request. … Fleming, Administrator, v. Fossati, 180 Or 489, 493 , 177 P2d 425 (1947); Hyland v. City of Eugene, 179 Or 567, 574 , 173 P2d 464 (1946).

Crawford v. Jackson

252 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

Oregon Constitution, Art VII, § 3; Godell v. Johnson, 250 Or 496 , 443 P2d 203 (1968). … McCaffrey v. Glendale Acres, 250 Or 140 , 440 P2d 219 (1968); Poulsen v. Johnson, 182 Or 297 , 186 P2d 521 (1947); Brown v. Jones, 137 Or 520 , 3 P2d 768 (1931). No error is found in the record. The judgment is affirmed.

Estate of Gerhardus

116 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1925

Bruce, 63 Okl. 270 ( 165 Pac. 405 ), wherein the court said: “Ah the rule announced in Lookabaugh v. Cooper is contrary to that contained in the opinion in Todd v. Orr and Philip Carey Co. v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Coomer v. Supple Investment Co.

128 Or. 224 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1929

Co., 99 Or. 58 ( 190 Pac. 331 , 195 Pac. 163 ); Turnidge v. Thompson, 89 Or. 637, 646 ( 175 Pac. 281 ); Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co., 82 Or. 149 ( 161 Pac. 411 ); Morgan v. … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Hotchkiss v. Union High School District No. 2

207 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1956

The italicized phrase was construed in Lumijarvi v. School Dist. … McBee v. School Dist. No. 48, 163 Or 121, 141-142 , 96 P2d 207 .

Nelson v. Smith

157 Or. 292 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1937

Justice Hunt in Rees v. Watertown, 19 Wall. 107, 124, 125 ( 22 L. … See Brown on Jurisdiction, 2 Ed., section 42, and cases there cited. This principle I think should be applied in the instant case. In Belknap v.

Johnson v. Shively

9 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

In Livingston v. Junction Railroad, 7 Ind., 598 , it is held that it is for the court to declare the force and effect of a written instrument called a release. (Symmes v. Brown, 13 Ind., 320 .) … (Montag v. Linn, 23 Ill., 556 ; Carpenter v. Thurston, 24 Cal., 268 .)

Campbell v. Roseburg Lumber Co.

288 Or. 223 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1979

Barber v. Gladden, 215 Or 129 , 332 P2d 641 (1958); Brown v. Brown, 142 Or 275 , 19 P2d 428 (1933); Gust v. Edwards Co., 129 Or 409 , 274 P 919 (1929); Salene v. Isherwood, 74 Or 35 , 144 P 1175 (1914); Yuen Suey v. … Fleshman, 65 Or 606 , 133 P 803 (1913); Belle v. Brown, 37 Or 588 , 61 P 1024 (1900).

Dunn v. City of Milwaukie

355 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2014

Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142-43, 117 P3d 990 (2005) (discussing the term “taking”); 1 Nichols on Eminent Domain § 1.11, 1-7 (Julius L. … See, e.g., Boise Cascade Corp. v. Board of Forestry, 325 Or 185, 198, 935 P2d 411 (1997) (apply- ing some economically viable use test to regulatory taking claim); Dodd v.

Cram v. Powell

100 Or. 708 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1921

BROWN, J. … Co. v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Porter

268 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1974

Starr v. Brotherhood’s Relief and Compensation Fund, 268 Or 66 , 518 P2d 1321 (1974); State v. Wilcox, 216 Or 110, 116-17 , 337 P2d 797 (1959). … See Craig v. Harney, 331 US 367 , 67 S Ct 1249 , 91 L Ed 1546 (1947); *425 Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 US 331 , 66 S Ct 1029 , 90 L Ed 1295 (1946); Bridges v.

School District v. School District

34 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

Corp. § 43a; State ex rel. v. Hulin, 2 Or. 306 ; Atchison, etc., R. R. Co. v. Wilson, 33 Kan. 223 ( 6 Pac. 281 ); In re Short, 47 Kan. 250 ( 27 Pac. 1005 ); Clement v. Everest, 29 Mich. 20 ; Trumbo v. … People, 75 Ill. 561 ; People v. Trustees of Newberry's Estate, 87 Ill. 41 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 467 ; School District No. 25 v.

Hermann v. Hutcheson

33 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1898

Bilyeu v. Smith, 18 Or. 335 , ( 22 Pac. 1073 ). 2. … Brown v. Goodyear, 29 Neb. 376 ( 45 N. W. 618 ); Freeman v. Burles, 16 Neb. 328 ( 20 N. W. 207 ). The return as it stands is insufficient, under Sloper v. Carey, 9 Or. 511 .

West Bearing & Parts, Inc. v. Peet

253 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1969

However, as pointed out by the Massachusetts court in McNear v. … Com’n, 1945, 313 Mich 66 , 20 NW2d 813 ; El Queeno Distributing Co. v. Christgau, 1946, 221 Minn 197, 21 NW2d 601 ; State v.

Rankin v. Buckman

9 Or. 253 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

But as was said in Hill v. … Brady and Smith v.

Goodale Lumber Co. v. Shaw

41 Or. 544 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1902

Co. v. Ruble, 8 Or. 284 . … Laws, §3221), and is organized by electing a board of directors, which can only be done when one half of the capital stock has been subscribed: Hill’s Ann. Laws, § 3222; Fairview R. Co. v.