Case law

School District v. School District

34 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

Corp. § 43a; State ex rel. v. Hulin, 2 Or. 306 ; Atchison, etc., R. R. Co. v. Wilson, 33 Kan. 223 ( 6 Pac. 281 ); In re Short, 47 Kan. 250 ( 27 Pac. 1005 ); Clement v. Everest, 29 Mich. 20 ; Trumbo v. … People, 75 Ill. 561 ; People v. Trustees of Newberry's Estate, 87 Ill. 41 ; Voss v. School District, 18 Kan. 467 ; School District No. 25 v.

Zidell v. Zidell, Inc.

277 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1977

See, e.g., Gottfried v. … "If there are plausible business reasons supportive of the decision of the board of directors, and such reasons can be given credence, a Court will not interfere with a corporate board’s right to make that decision.

School Dist. No. 9 v. MAXWELL ET UX.

189 Or. 317 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1950

189 Or. 317 (1950) 219 P.2d 155 220 P.2d 95 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 v. MAXWELL ET UX. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued March 29, 1950. Affirmed May 31, 1950. Petition for rehearing denied June 27, 1950. *319 H.T. … The board of directors of School District No. 1 were opposed to consolidation.

State v. Childers

71 Or. 340 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1914

App. 498; Huffman v. State, 28 Tex. App. 174 ( 12 S. W. 588 ); McGrew v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. 336 ( 20 S. W. 740 ). See, also, Commonwealth v. Butts, 124 Mass. 449 . … There is *351 someone assisting me and in charge, also; it is John Brown.’ John Brown testified: ‘I have charge of Sarason Griedry’s cattle. After I came down there, me and L.

In Re King

165 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1940

On the 2nd day of July, 1940, this court affirmed judgment of conviction of State v. … State v. Kang, supra.

Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission v. Department of Revenue

346 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2009

Dunn v. State University, 9 Or 357, 361 (1881) (“It is true the legislature has not declared [the board of directors of the University of Oregon] to be a corporation in express terms, but this was not essential.”). … See United States v.

Shephard v. Department of Community Corrections of Washington County

293 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1982

The county’s Board of Commissioners (Board) was apprised of the claim on June 10, 1980. … Our attention has also been directed to State Sav. and Loan Ass’n v.

Denny v. Seeley

34 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1899

Brown, 16 Iowa, 130 ; Ryan v. Trustees, 14 Ill. 20 ; Wolf v. Banning, 3 Minn. 202 ; Johns v. Reardon, 11 Md. 465 ; Knight v. Whitehead, 26 Miss. 245 ; Barnes v. Mott, 64 N. Y. 397 ( 21 Am. Rep. 625 ); Wallace v. … Jur. § 326; Brown v. Rathburn, 10 Or. 158 ; Griffeth v. Moss, 94 Ga. 199 ( 21 S. E. 463 ); Kirkpatrick v. Howk, 80 Ill. 122 ; Stetuart v. Davis’ Executor, 18 Ind. 74 ; Bonney v. Bonney, 29 Iowa, 448 ; Barrow v.

Maddox v. McHattan

111 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1924

BROWN, J. Responding to the assignments of error, we have searched the record in vain for the purpose of examining the exceptions noted therein to the rulings of the court. … A few of the more recent cases are: Nibley v. Delahunt, 105 Or. 46 ( 209 Pac. 473 ); Nally v. Richmond, 105 Or. 462 ( 209 Pac. 871 ); State v. Chase, 106 Or. 263 ( 211 Pac. 920 ); Davis v. Arnold Irr.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Black

228 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1961

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State B>ar *10 recommended to the court that accused, Black, be permanently disbarred. Black petitioned the court for review. … The Board of Governors substantially affirmed the trial committee’s findings.

Willamette Grocery Co. v. Skiff

118 Or. 685 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1926

Bank v. Garbarino, 82 Or. 405, 410 ( 161 Pac. 703 ); Garnier v. Wheeler, 40 Or. 191, 201 ( 66 Pac. 812 ); Brown v. Case, 41 Or. 221, 233 ( 69 Pac. 43 ); Flynn v. Baisley, 35 Or. 268, 271 ( 57 Pac. 908 , 76 Am. St. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Hazen v. Cook

293 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1982

Nat’l Bank v. … Brown, 285 Or 131 , 590 P2d 209 (1979), cited by the Court of Appeals, is not in point.

Shea v. State Industrial Accident Commission

118 Or. 642 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1926

*643 BROWN, J. … Justice MoEeynolds, wrote: “When an employee working on board a vessel in navigable waters sustains personal injuries there, and seeks damages from the employer, the applicable legal principles are very different from those

Biggs v. McBride

5 L.R.A. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1889

Pegg, 18 Ind. 24 ; Goodsell v. Boynton, 1 Scam. 555 ; State v. Click, 2 Ala. 26 ; Matter of Joseph Richardson, 2 Story, 571; People v. Clark, 1 Cal. 406 ; Baker v. Compton, 52 Tex. 252 ; Logan v. … State, 52 Miss. 665 ; State v. Pritchard, 36 N. J. L. 101; Honey v. Graham, 39 Tex. 1 ; Dallam v.

Seaton v. Security Savings & Trust Co.

131 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929

In State v. … Brown and Belt, JJ., absent. Rand, J., concurs in result.

State v. Donahue

75 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1914

Brown, Attorney General, and Mr. Thomas H. Tongue, Jr., contra, with oral arguments by Mr. Edmund B. Tongue and Mr. George M. Brown. Mr. Justice McBride delivered the opinion of the court. … In Bilanshy v.

North v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'n

59 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1911

Ed. 827 ); Brewer v. Boston Theater, 104 Mass. 378 ; Foss v. Harbottle, 2 Hare, 461. … Cook, Corporations (6 ed.) §736; Montgomery Light Co. v. Lahey, 121 Ala. 131 ( 25 South. 1006 ); Earle v. Seattle, Co. (C. C.) 56 Fed. 909 ; Forrester v. B. & M. Mining Co., 21 Mont. 544 ( 55 Pac. 229, 353 ). *490 4.

State v. German

162 Or. 166 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1939

The corporation, in such a case, is to be regarded as the mere instrumentality through which the fraud is committed. *177 This view is supported by the well considered case of Brown v. State, 3 Ohio App. 52 . … The case of State v.

State Ex Rel. Mix v. Newland

277 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1977

First, did the trial court have the power to enter its original decree restraining Newland from any further proceedings before the federal patent board? … State ex rel v. Downing, supra. See also Donovan v. City of Dallas, supra; United States v. United Mine Workers, supra; Howat v. Kansas, supra.

State v. Kephart

320 Or. 433 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1994

See State v. … PGE v.