Case law

State Ex Rel. Mix v. Newland

277 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1977

First, did the trial court have the power to enter its original decree restraining Newland from any further proceedings before the federal patent board? … State ex rel v. Downing, supra. See also Donovan v. City of Dallas, supra; United States v. United Mine Workers, supra; Howat v. Kansas, supra.

Baer v. CITY OF BEND

206 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1956

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 639 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 . See, also, Schneider v. New Jersey, supra, 308 US at p 161 ; Thomas v. … See West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, supra, 319 US at p 631 ; Commonwealth v. Beiler, 168 Pa Super 462, 79 A2d 134 .

Linster v. East Lake Health Resort, Inc.

143 Or. 63 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1932

that defendants Atkinson, O’Neil, Meisted, Tyson, DeArmond and Bellett, as stockholders in defendant, East Lake Health Resort, Inc., a corporation, conspired to obtain control of said corporation by illegally electing a board … Without such substitution, the circuit court could not grant the relief plaintiff seeks (Parker v. Badger, 26 N. H. 466), and this court is without jurisdiction. Oregon Auto-Dispatch v.

State v. Stannard

84 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 15, 1917

In Grant County v. … S.) 1051); Andrews v. Neil, 61 Or. 471 ( 120 Pac. 383 , 123 Pac. 32 ); Bowers v. Niel, 64 Or. 104 ( 128 Pac. 433 ); Wingate v. Clatsop County, 71 Or. 94 ( 142 Pac. 561 ); Stoppenback v.

Harris v. Schnitzer

146 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1933

We quote from Greig v. … This duty is well stated in Sabin v. Wilkins, supra, and in Currie v. Bowman, 25 Or. 364 , 35 P. 848 .

West v. Gladden

249 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

Also, ORS 137.510 expresses the previous holding of this court in State v. … Again, OES 144.400, which follows OES 144.390, provides that “[t]he State Board of Parole and Probation may parole a violator of parole, conditional pardon or probation” without first returning bim to the penitentiary.

Tualatin Valley Bargaining Council v. Tigard School District 23J

314 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1992

Ct., 1972); New Jersey, Dunnellen Bd. of Educ. v. Dunnellen Educ. Assn., 85 LRRM 2131 (NJ Sup. Ct., 1973); New York, Teachers Assn. v. Helsby, 87 LRRM 2618 (NY App. Ct., 1974); Pennsylvania, Labor Relations Board v. … Assn. v. Board of Educ., 85 LRRM 2801 (SD Sup. Ct., 1974). “It has been held to be mandatory in Connecticut, West Hartford Educ. Assn. v. DeCourey, 80 LRRM 2423 (Conn. Sup.

In Re Jaffee

319 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1994

In re Parker, 314 Or. 143, 154-55 , 838 P.2d 54 (1992) cert. den. sub nom Parker v. Bd. of Bar Examiners, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993) and Parker v. … In re Parker, 314 Or. 143, 154 , 838 P.2d 54 (1992) cert. den. sub nom Parker v. Oregon State Bd. of Bar Examiners, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993) and Parker v.

North v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'n

59 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1911

Ed. 827 ); Brewer v. Boston Theater, 104 Mass. 378 ; Foss v. Harbottle, 2 Hare, 461. … Cook, Corporations (6 ed.) §736; Montgomery Light Co. v. Lahey, 121 Ala. 131 ( 25 South. 1006 ); Earle v. Seattle, Co. (C. C.) 56 Fed. 909 ; Forrester v. B. & M. Mining Co., 21 Mont. 544 ( 55 Pac. 229, 353 ). *490 4.

Willamette Grocery Co. v. Skiff

118 Or. 685 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1926

Bank v. Garbarino, 82 Or. 405, 410 ( 161 Pac. 703 ); Garnier v. Wheeler, 40 Or. 191, 201 ( 66 Pac. 812 ); Brown v. Case, 41 Or. 221, 233 ( 69 Pac. 43 ); Flynn v. Baisley, 35 Or. 268, 271 ( 57 Pac. 908 , 76 Am. St. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Shea v. State Industrial Accident Commission

118 Or. 642 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1926

*643 BROWN, J. … Justice MoEeynolds, wrote: “When an employee working on board a vessel in navigable waters sustains personal injuries there, and seeks damages from the employer, the applicable legal principles are very different from those

Burrell v. City of Portland

61 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1912

In the case of Cunningham et al v. … Whether the contract shall be let upon the unit plan, or by some other method, should be decided by the board, and not by the court. 12 Cur. Law, p. 1479; Shannon v. Portland, 38 Or. 382 ( 62 Pac. 50 ) ; Anderson v. St.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Black

228 Or. 9 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1961

The Board of Governors of the Oregon State B>ar *10 recommended to the court that accused, Black, be permanently disbarred. Black petitioned the court for review. … The Board of Governors substantially affirmed the trial committee’s findings.

Seaton v. Security Savings & Trust Co.

131 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929

In State v. … Brown and Belt, JJ., absent. Rand, J., concurs in result.

In Re King

165 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1940

On the 2nd day of July, 1940, this court affirmed judgment of conviction of State v. … State v. Kang, supra.

Shephard v. Department of Community Corrections of Washington County

293 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1982

The county’s Board of Commissioners (Board) was apprised of the claim on June 10, 1980. … Our attention has also been directed to State Sav. and Loan Ass’n v.

Community Bank v. United States Nat. Bank of Ore.

276 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1976

State Farm v. Century Home, 275 Or 97, 104 , 550 P2d 1185 (1976); Jones v. Flannigan, 270 Or 121, 124 , 526 P2d 543 (1974). … See West Side Bank v.

Balderree v. Oregon State Bar

301 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1986

Respondents rely on ORS 9.529 and the implications of our decision in State ex rel Robeson v. Oregon State Bar, 291 Or 505 , 632 P2d 1255 (1981). … State ex rel Robeson v. Oregon State Bar, 291 Or at 511 . To hold, therefore, that we have no jurisdiction in this case although we passed on the *160 merits of the claim in Robeson would exalt form over substance.

Haberly v. Treadgold

67 Or. 425 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1913

Property dedicated to the public is not subject to sale and transfer at the whim of the board. … Cas. 575; Johnson v. Savage, 50 Or. 294 ( 91 Pac. 1082 ); Runyon v. Winstoch, 55 Or. 202 ( 104 Pac. 417 , 105 Pac. 895 ). This is a question not raised in the lower court and therefore not before us for decision.

Sharvy v. Secretary of Oregon

304 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1987

Brown v.