Case law

Satterfield v. Satterfield

292 Or. 780 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1982

PUD, 213 Or 264, 310 , 323 P2d 664 (1958); School Dist. 1, Mult Co. v. … Bingham et al, 204 Or 601, 604 , 283 P2d 670 , 284 P2d 779 (1955), unless application of the literal meaning would produce an unintended, absurd result, Brown v.

Bernstein v. Berg

123 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1927

See Snyder v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 107 Or. 673 ( 215 Pac. 887 ); Bertin & Lepori v. Mattison, 80 Or. 354 ( 157 Pac. 152 , 5 A. L. R. 590); Houser v. West, 39 Or. 392 ( 65 Pac. 82 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Huff v. Great Western Seed Co.

322 Or. 457 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1996

In so holding, the court relied on its own opinions in Kraxberger v. Chevron USA Inc., 118 Or App 686 , 848 P2d 1242 (1993), and Cortez v. … An exchange occurred between Senator Walt Brown, a member of the committee, and Representative Gretchen Kafouiy concerning the issue: “SEN W. BROWN expressed his concern on HB 2223 to Rep.

School District 47 v. United States National Bank

187 Or. 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1949

In the case of school districts the command is issued by the school board or other governing authority to the custodian of the school funds. Dubard v. Nevin, 178 Ark. 436 , 10 S. … No. 61 v.

Arneil v. Schnitzer

173 Or. 179 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1943

v. … Prince v.

Northwest Amusement Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

165 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1940

The distinction between the case at bar and Brown v. … Case No. 1 of United Security Life Insurance Co. v. Brown, 270 Pa. St. 264, 113 Atl. 443 , which is a companion case to the one cited by plaintiff and bearing the same title, reported in 270 Pa.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Means

207 Or. 638 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1956

Rheb v. Bar Association of Baltimore City, 186 Md 200, 45 A2d 289 , supports the bar’s view. Bartos v. United States District Court, 19 F2d 722, is contra. The reasoning in Hargrove v. … But, if it be true, as held by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Hargrove v.

Magill v. French

76 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1915

The contention that the action of the board was void because they did not have before them any legal proof that the notices had been properly posted cannot be upheld. As stated in Nicklaus v. … In snob case the burden of proof is upon the party attacking the proceedings to show that no legal notice was given: Pagels v. Oaks, 64 Iowa, 198 ( 19 N. W. 905 ); Foster v.

Dannells v. United States National Bank

172 Or. 213 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1943

V. … W. 876 ; Brown v. Kinsey, 81 N. C. 245 ; Burton v. Belvin, 142 N. C. 151 , 55 S. E. 71 ; Thayer v. Thayer, 189 N. C. 502 , 127 S. E. 553 , 39 A. L. R. 428; Panther v. McKnight, 125 Okl. 134 , 256 P. 916 ; Wyant v.

Moe v. Coe

124 Or. 436 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1928

BROWN, J. … Hence such contract of sale and purchase is void and of no effect: Bishop’s Law of Contracts, § 547; State v. Fraser, 105 Or. 589 ( 209 Pac. 467 ); State v. Whiteaker, 118 Or. 656 ( 247 Pac. 1077 ); State v.

Wilson v. Welch

12 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1885

(Dalaplaine v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. 42 Wis. 214 ; Lorman v. Benson, 8 Mich. 18 .) … In Codman v.

Weathers v. ICOA Life Insurance

254 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1969

Weathers testified to a representation which was apparently consistent with the resolution of the defendant’s Board of Directors. … Stacy v. Smith, 244 Or 336, 340 , 418 P2d 32 (1966). (Also a suit for rescission.)

Schrader v. Schrader

242 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966

Peters v. Dietrich, 145 Or 589 , 27 P2d 1015 ; Carmichael v. Carmichael, 101 Or 172 , 199 P 385 . … Brown v. Becker, 135 Or 353 , 295 P 1113 ; McFarlane v. McFarlane, 45 Or 360 , 77 P 837 .

State v. Allen

152 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1936

In State v. … In State v.

School District No. 1 v. Multnomah County

164 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1940

While school districts are bodies corporate, and, as such are authorized to hold and dispose of property in their name and corporate capacity, Vestal, et al. v. … Pickering, et al., 125 Or. 553 , 267 P. 821 ; Splonskofsky v.

Swingle v. Medford Irrigation District

121 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1927

BROWN, J. … In Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99 ( 167 Pac. 590 ), Mr.

Kordon v. Mercer Industries

308 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1989

The board affirmed the referee but denied claimant’s request for attorney fees. Upon review, the Court of Appeals reversed the denial of attorney fees and remanded to the board to award fees. Kordon v. … Bracke v. Baza’r, 294 Or 483, 490 , 658 P2d 1158 (1983), was decided in February 1983. Teel v.

Jones v. Wallace

291 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 19, 1981

The three shareholders also constituted the board of directors. … State v. Franklin, 283 Or 439 , 583 P2d 557 (1978); State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621 , 561 P2d 1006 (1977). 9 See, e.g., Brewer v. Erwin, 287 Or 435 , 600 P2d 398 (1979). 10 See, e.g., Krauss v.

Columbia Tent & Awning Co. v. Thiele

135 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1930

R. 744); Seeck v. Jakel, 71 Or. 35 ( 141 P. 211 , L. R. A. 1915A, 679). … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Kelley v. Kelley

183 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1948

See State v. Vincent, 152 Or. 205 , 52 P. (2d) 203 . Next, the remedy of support money and that of separation from bed and board were not concurrent in 1939. … Geils v. Geils, 1 Macqueens App. Cas. 255; Allison v. Catley, 11 Scot. Jur. 529; Green v. Green, Law Rep. 3 Prob. and Div. 121; Murdock v. Murdock, 148 App. Div. 564 , 132 N. Y. Supp. 964 ; Driver v. Driver, 24 Pa.