Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.13s

  • State Ex Rel. Duncan v. Dean

    123 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1927

    Having in effect stipulated that the matter should be decided by the jury, the board now complains of an adverse finding. As stated in 35 C. … Citing Danziger v. Metropolitan Electric R. R. Co., 81 Hun, 5 ( 30 N. Y. Supp. 580 ); Wright v. Wright, 50 Tex. Civ. App. 459 ( 110 S. W. 158 ); Houston Real Estate Inv. Co. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. Watkins

    347 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2010

    Corp., Inc. v. Watkins, 224 Or App 599 , 198 P3d 960 (2008). … The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) later approved the CDA.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union

    328 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1998

    Williams v. Waterway Terminals Co., 298 Or 506, 510 , 693 P2d 1290 (1985), citing Vaughn v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone, 289 Or 73 , 611 P2d 218 (1980). … Shaw v. Doyle Milling Co., 297 Or 251, 255 , 683 P2d 82 (1984).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Northwest Administrators, Inc. v. Wildish Sand & Gravel Co.

    275 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1976

    Local 701 v. Brady-Hamilton, 258 Or 484 , 483 P2d 1303 (1971); San Diego Unions v. Garmon, 359 US 236 (1959); Guss v. Utah Labor Board, 353 US 1 (1957); Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge, 403 US 274 (1970). … Also, the existence of a remedy before the National Labor Relations Board for an unfair labor practice does not necessarily preclude state court jurisdiction in such a case. See Carey v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Schafer v. Schafer

    243 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1966

    The defendant filed a cross complaint on the same grounds and asked for *243 a decree of separation from bed and board. … Kreutzer v. Kreutzer, 226 Or 158 , 359 P2d 536 . Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Clatsop County

    63 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1912

    , in order to show the authority of the board in making the apportionment. … Two v. Lambert, 28 Or. 209 ( 42 Pac. 221 ) ; National Bank of D. O. Mills & Co. v. Herold, 74 Cal. 603 ( 16 Pac. 507 : 5 Am. St. Rep. 476 ) ; Dubuc v. Foss, 19 La. Ann. 210 ( 92 Am. Dec. 526 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hartman v. Young

    2 L.R.A. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1888

    In Hudson v. … .” *162 In Dorey v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Phipps v. Paulus

    292 Or. 698 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1982

    Abolishes Department of Land Conservation and Development, Land Conservation and Development Commission and Land Use Board of Appeals (sooner). … For recent descriptions of this court’s role in reviewing ballot titles, see Christie v. Paulus, 292 Or 344 , 638 P2d 478 (1981), Zajonc v. Paulus, 292 Or 19 , 636 P2d 417 (1981).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Martin

    43 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1903

    Such evidence is also competent to show that the transfer of personal property bj a conveyance absolute in form was in trust for the assignor: Chace v. Chapin, 130 Mass. 128 . … Plaintiff had ample means with which to pay his own board, and there is no reason adduced why he did not do so.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC v. Department of Revenue

    356 Or. 164 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014

    In Nepom v. … See Delehant v. Board on Police Standards and Training, 317 Or 273, 278, 855 P2d 1088 (1993) (“Retroactive application of a rule is not automatically impermis- sible, however.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Jaeger v. Jaeger

    224 Or. 281 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1960

    Wallace v. Portland Ry. L. P. … That issue is settled adversely to the plaintiff-appellant by Omlie v. Hunt, 211 Or 472 , 316 P2d 528 ; Hartnell v. Hartnell, 208 Or 429 , 301 P2d 1040 ; and Rea v. Rea, 195 Or 252 , 245 P2d 884 . We find no error.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Radford v. First Nat. Bank

    71 Or. 84 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1914

    In Williams v. Matthews, 47 N. J. … Brown was the business manager of the plaintiffs, and transacted for the plaintiffs practically all the business with Hall. Brown has had a long experience in the lumber and sawmill business.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Casualty Co. v. Corum

    321 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1995

    894 P.2d 461 (1995) 321 Or. 135 AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner on review/Respondent on review, v. Aaron T. … Brown of Cosgrave, Vergeer & Kester, Portland, filed a response brief on behalf of respondent on review Truck Ins. Exchange. MEMORANDUM OPINION The petitions for review are allowed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. SAIF Corp.

    343 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2007

    The board affirmed the opinion and order of the ALJ, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s decision without opinion. Johnson v. SAIF, 200 Or App 414 , 115 P3d 988 (2005). … See, e.g., Hans v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bassett

    240 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1965

    In re Hallinan, 48 Cal2d 52, 307 P2d 1 (1957); In re Alker, 398 Pa 188, 157 A2d 749 (1960); In re Seijas, 52 Wash2d 1, 318 P2d 961 (1957); Tomlinson v. Lefkowits, 334 F2d 262 (5th Cir 1964); Chanan Din Khan v. … Barber, 253 F2d 547 (9th Cir 1958), cert. den. 357 US 920 (1958), 78 S Ct 1361 , 2 L Ed2d 1364; Tseung Chu v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Loveland v. Plant

    132 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1930

    L., § 560; Hawkins v. Jones, 21 Or. 502 ( 28 P. 548 ); Manary v. Runyon, 43 Or. 495, 501 ( 73 P. 1028 ). Belt, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wright v. Ramp

    41 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1902

    And the same rule will apply if the agreement is to be construed as a contract for work or skill and the materials upon which it is bestowed: Graver v. Horn-burg, 26 Kan. 94 ; Moody v. Brown, 56 Am. Dec. 640 , and note. … Massie, 29 Or. 140 ( 44 Pac. 494 ); Moody v. Richards, 29 Or. 282 ( 45 Pac. 777 ); Daly v. Larsen, 29 Or. 535 ( 46 Pac. 143 ); Breding v. Williams, 33 Or. 391 ( 54 Pac. 206 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State v. Compson

    34 Or. 25 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1898

    The following cases support this doctrine: Board of Revenue v. Barber, 53 Ala. 589 ; People v. Osborne, 7 Colo. 605 ( 4 Pac. 1074 ); State v. Covington, 29 Ohio St. 102 ; People v. Draper, 15 N. Y. 532 ; People v. … Section 2 of the Act creating the Board of Railroad Commissioners and prescribing its duties reads as follows: “Said commissioners constituting said board shall be chosen biennially by the Legislative Assembly of the State

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Pilling v. Travelers Ins. Co. (In re Comp. of Pilling)

    365 Or. 236 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2019

    PGE v. … See SAIF v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leonard v. Bonser

    130 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1929

    Broadwell et at., 124 Or. 652 ( 265 Pac. 783 ); Barnes v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 112 Or. 41 (228 Pac. 684); Graves v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 112 Or. 143, 147, 148 ( 223 Pac. 248 ); Thomas v. … Rep. 713 ); Elwert v. Marley, 53 Or. 591 ( 99 Pac. 887 , 101 Pac. 671 , 133 Am. St. Rep. 850 ). Appeal dismissed. Brown, J., absent.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.