Case law

Carruthers v. Astoria

72 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1914

It is said in the syllabus in Mandeville v. Riggs, 27 U. S. (2 Pet.) 482 , 7 L. … v.

Johnson v. SAIF Corp.

343 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2007

The board affirmed the opinion and order of the ALJ, and the Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s decision without opinion. Johnson v. SAIF, 200 Or App 414 , 115 P3d 988 (2005). … See, e.g., Hans v.

Othus v. Kozer

119 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1926

In Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 568 ( 28 L. Ed. 1079 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648, see, also, Rose’s U. S. … Brown and Coshow, JJ., were absent. Rand, J., did not participate in this decision.

Schafer v. Schafer

243 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1966

The defendant filed a cross complaint on the same grounds and asked for *243 a decree of separation from bed and board. … Kreutzer v. Kreutzer, 226 Or 158 , 359 P2d 536 . Reversed and remanded.

Holmes v. Olcott

96 Or. 33 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1920

In the leading case of Ristine v. … In People v.

Hubler v. Gaston

9 Or. 66 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

In Wilkinson v. … (Chapman v. Shephard, 39 Conn., 420 ; Kimberey v. Patchin, 19 N. Y., 330 ; Russell v. Car rington, 42 N. Y., 118 ; Waldron v. Chase, 37 Maine, 414; 44 N. J., 486; 6 Randall, 473.)

Hughes v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

234 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

Of particular significance to the present question is Dean v. Brown, supra. … A similar analogy was suggested in Dean v. Brown, supra.

State v. Long

315 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1992

State v. … Warren v. Marion County, [supra].” Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, supra, 288 Or at 298 n 3.

In Re Potts

301 Or. 57 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1986

We agree with the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board that Potts violated DR 2-107(A). … See State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Reuter, 299 Or. 155 , 161-62 n. 7, 700 P.2d 236 , 240 n. 7 (1985)." Heritage Enterprises v.

Farrin v. State Industrial Accident Commission

104 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1922

BROWN, J. … Brown v. Oregon Lbr. Co., 24 Or. 315, 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ).

STATE Ex Rel ROBERTS v. GRUBER

231 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1962

City of San Francisco v. Hazen, 5 Cal 175; Board of Com’rs. of Salem v. Wachovia Loan & Trust Co., 143 NC 110, 55 SE 442 , 118 Am St Rep 791; Mayor and City Council of Anniston v. Davis, supra; State ex rel Peterson v. … Foxcroft, that is to say, that it is the duty of members of a city council to vote and that *501 they ought not “by inaction, prevent action by the board.” Somers v. City of Bridgeport, supra.

Hamilton Management Corp. v. State Tax Commission

253 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1969

As we said in American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. … t * ” Quoting from Wisconsin v. J. C.

Toomey v. MOORE ET UX

325 F.2d 805 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1958

Bahr, 161 Or 79 , 87 P2d 219 ; In re Brown’s Estate, supra; Ramstead v. Bridges, supra; Gilliam v. Schoen, supra; and Legler et al v. Legler, 187 Or 273 , 211 P2d 233 . … Gilliam v.

Farr v. Myers

343 Or. 681 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2007

Sizemore v. Myers, 326 Or 220, 230 , 953 P2d 360 (1997) (“factual investigation” is well beyond the scope of a ballot title review). … See, e.g., ORS 676.160(3) (State Board of Clinical Social Workers); OES 676.160(6) (Board of Examiners of Licensed Dietitians); OES 676.160(9) (Board of Naturopathic Examiners); OES 676.160(13) (State Board of Pharmacy);

Eugene Pioneer Cemetery Ass'n v. Spencer Butte Lodge No. 9

228 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1961

Benson v. Williams, 174 Or 404, 433-434 , 143 P2d 477 , 149 P2d 549 ; Woolsey v. Draper, 103 Or 103, 111 , 201 P 730 , 203 P 582 ; Goodin v. Cornelius, 101 Or 422, 440 , 200 P 915 ; Goff v. … Hyland v. Oregon Agricultural Co., 111 Or 212, 219 , 225 P 728 ; Woolsey v. Draper, supra; Knight v. Alexander, 42 Or 521, 523-524 , 71 P 657 .

Miller v. Conley

96 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1920

In Murphy v. Newingham, 151 Ky. 360 ( 151 S. … In the syllabus to Porter v. Pettengill, 57 Or. 247 ( 110 Pac. 393 ), condensing the opinion written by Mr.

Steel v. Fell

29 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1896

The term “taxable property” is sometimes used in a sense to indicate that which a person owns exclusive of indebtedness: Stephens v. School District Number Twenty-One, 6 Or. 353 ; Cooley on Taxation, 174. … The assessor, in making the assessment, and the board of equalization, sitting as a board of review, act in a judicial capacity, and when the roll has passed from their hands it ought to be conclusive in so- *277 far as they

Willow River Water Users Ass'n v. Orchards Water Co.

119 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1924

Also, Blakely v. Ft. Lyon Canal Co. , 31 Colo. 224 ( 73 P. 249 , 251 ); Smith v. Willis , 84 Or. 271 , 283 ( 163 P. 810 ); Black v. Baker , 126 Wn. 604 ( 219 P. 59 ); Imperial Water Co. v. … Holabird , 197 Fed. 4, 18 ( 116 C.C.A. 526 ); Blakely v. Ft. Lyon Canal Co. , 31 Colo. 224 ( 73 P. 249 , 251 ); Smith v. Willis , 84 Or. 271 , 283 ( 163 P. 810 ); Black v.

Johnson v. Baker

142 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1933

It is a well established rule that a vessel upon the high seas is followed by the law of the nation or state in which its owner resides: Fisher v. Fisher, 250 N. Y. 313 ( 165 N. E. 460 , 61 A. L. R. 1523); Bolmer v. … (Patterson v. Gaines, 6 How. U. S. 550; Rex v. Brampton, 10 East, 282; Londonderry v. Chester, 2 N. H. 268; State v. Abbey, 29 Vt. 60 ; Meyers v. Pope, 110 Mass. 314 ; Redgrave v. Redgrave, 38 Md. 93 .)”

Morse v. Oregon Division of State Lands

285 Or. 197 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1979

Subsequently, Shively v. … Beginning with Bowlby v.