Case law

Newport Church of the Nazarene v. Hensley

335 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2002

The Employment Appeals Board (board) of the Oregon Employment Department (department) awarded claimant benefits, but not attorney fees or interest. … The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s award of unemployment compensation benefits and denial of attorney fees, but reversed the board’s denial of interest on the award. Newport Church of the Nazarene v.

West v. Coos County

115 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1925

board the managing agents for county affairs.” … In the absence of fraud or mistake, their conclusion will be binding upon the parties: Sebree v. Board of Education, 254 Ill. 438, 446 ( 98 N. E. 931 ); 1 Mechem on Sales, § 212, and note; Norton v.

Day v. Celoria Et Ux.

116 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1925

The learned circuit judge sustained tbe demurrer on authority of the case of State Land Board v. Lee, 84 Or. 431 ( 165 Pac. 372 ). … Justice Bean in Hydraulic Mining Co. v.

Maddox v. State Accident Insurance Fund

290 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1981

The Workers’ Compensation Board and the Court of Appeals in a Per Curiam opinion, citing its decision in James v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520 , 605 P2d 1391 (1980), affirmed. … The question is the one we stated in James v. SAIF and the one answered by the dissenting member of the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Bonnett v. Keiffer

115 Or. 244 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1925

This instruction has been approved by this court since the adoption of the constitutional amendment of 1910 containing the language above quoted; Scott v. Merrill’s Estate, 74 Or. 568 ( 146 Pac. 99 ); Branch v. … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Place v. FRIESEN LUMBER COMPANY

258 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1971

The Workmen’s Compensation Board entered an order affirming the award of the Hearings Officer. Prom the board’s order, plaintiff filed an appeal in the circuit court for Multnomah county. … In Graves v.

State v. Miller

317 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1993

The Court of Appeals relied on its decisions in State v. Bucholz, 113 Or App 705 , 834 P2d 456 (1992), and State v. … See, e.g., Or Laws 1989, ch 790, § 98 (detailed in this court’s decision today in State v. Bucholz, supra). Legislative adoption, not just board promulgation, is presently required by law for any sentencing guideline.

Portland v. Bituminous Paving Co.

44 L.R.A. 527 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1898

Such, in effect, is the holding of the court in Brown v. Jenks, 98 Cal. 10 ( 32 Pac. 701 ) wherein the court say : " This act contains no grant of authority to the city council for keeping a street in repair. … Louis v. Davidson, 102 Mo. 149 ( 22 Am. St. Rep. 764 , 14 S. W. 825 ). State Board of Agriculture v. Citizens’ St. Ry. Co. 47 Ind. 407 ( 17 Am. Rep. 702 ) is to the same effect as applied to a private corporation.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lenske

259 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1971

State ex rel Oregon State Bar v. Lenske, 243 Or 477 , 405 P2d 510 , 407 P2d 250 (1966). Plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied, Lenske v. … We believe that'the fine of $500 and costs imposed upon the accused by this court in State ex rel *231 Oregon State Bar v.

Burness v. Multnomah County

37 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1900

Woodruff, 10 Or. 133 ; White v. Commissioners, 13 Or. 317 , 57 Am. Rep. 20 , 10 Pac. 484 ; Wormington v. Pierce, 22 Or. 606 , 30 Pac. 450 ; Sherman v. Bellows, 24 Or. 553 , 34 Pac. 549 ; Avery v. … Wayne v. Lehr, *469 88 Ind. 62 ; Smith v. Los Angeles County, 99 Cal. 628 ( 84 Pac. 439 ); House v. Los Angeles County, 104 Cal. 73 ( 37 Pac. 796 ). 2.

Schaefer v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

167 Or. 679 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1941

Newton, 138 Or. 6 , 4 P. (2d) 314 (1931); Lloyd v. Brown, 138 Or. 58 , 288 P. 505 , 5 P. (2d) 83 (1931).” As stated by the late Mr. … Streby v.

McBee v. McBee

22 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1892

(Brown v. Brown, 38 Ark. 328 .) “Occasional acts of drunkenness do not make one an habitual drunkard. Nor is it necessary that he should be continually in an intoxicated state. … In Walton v.

Redmond Realty Co. v. Central Oregon Irrigation District

140 Or. 282 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1932

In Medford Irrigation District v. … The primary and only source for the payment of warrants issued for operation and maintenance is the annual assessments levied and assessed by the board of directors: Kollock v.

Johnson v. Helmer

100 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1921

S.) 1119); Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 ( 71 N. W. 1031 , 65 Am. St. Rep. 559 , 38 L. R. A. 669); People v. Powers, 147 N. Y. 104 ( 41 N. E. 432 , 35 L. R. A. 502); Brown v. Caldwell, 23 W. Va. 187 ( 48 Am. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

Ravlin v. Hood River Peoples' Utility District

165 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1940

Co. v. Public Service Commission, 225 Wis. 198 , 274 N. … The designation of polling places “to be the usual ones in such Parkdale, Odell, Barrett and Waueoma Precincts” is sufficient in the light of State ex rel. v. Bailey, 151 Or. 496 , 51 P. (2d) 671 , and City of Salem v.

Boardman v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania

84 Or. 60 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1917

Steger, 5 Or. 147 ; Lewis v. Lewis, 5 Or. 169 ; Stephens v. Murton, 6 Or. 193 ; McCoy v. Bayley, 8 Or. 196 ; Foster v. Schmeer, 15 Or. 363 ( 15 Pac. 626 ); Hyland v. Hyland, 19 Or. 51 ( 23 Pac. 811 ); Meier v. … Board-man further says that two days after the fire, which happened on the night of August 2-3,1915, Mr.

State v. Gates

104 Or. 112 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1922

Dist. v. Pacific Livestock Co., 89 Or. 19, 24 ( 173 Pac. 265 ). … If such was not the meaning of the act of 1901, then the closing order approved in Portland Fish Co. v. Benson, 56 Or. 147 ( 108 Pac. 122 ), was in excess of the authority of the board.

First Nat. Bank v. Buckland Et Ux.

128 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1929

Brown, 127 Or. 551 ( 272 Pac. 914 ), opinion rendered December 29, 1928; Clarke v. Philomath College, 99 Or. 366 ( 193 Pac. 470 , 195 Pac. 822 ); Grant County Bank v. Hayes, 76 Or. 407 ( 149 Pac. 473 ); Hillsboro Nat. … Rand, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Gourley

209 Or. 363 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1956

In Carter v. La Dee Logging Co., supra, an independent contract logger was treated as one in such possession. … Plaintiff cites Carter v. La Dee Logging Co., supra, for the proposition that the duty imposed on owners is nondelegable.

Maeder Steel Products Co. v. Zanello

109 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1923

BROWN, J. … Brown v. Aurora, 109 Ill. 165, 167 . “Ultimate fact.