Case law

Gibbons v. Hood River Irr. Dist.

66 Or. 208 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1913

The amendment of Section 6186 imposes upon the board of directors the duty before devolving upon the assessor, namely, the duty of preparing a budget of the financial needs of the defendant company for the following year, … Therefore, the amendment cannot apply to obligations existing at the time of the enactment: Strand v. Griffith, 63 Wash. 334 ( 115 Pac. 512 ). 2.

Haley v. Sprague

166 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1940

A. 548; Engle v. State Land Board 164 Or. 109 , 99 P. (2d) 1018 ; and Wood v. Sprague, 165 Or. 122 , 106 P. (2d) 287 . This practice conserves the time of the court, or the parties and of the witnesses. … In Dahlstrom v.

Nickum v. Burckhardt

30 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1897

The corporation may elect its board of directors when one-half of the capital stock has been-subscribed: Hill’s Code, § 3222; Fairview R. R. Co. v. Spillman, 23 Or. 587 ( 32 Pac. 688 ). … Co. v. Gifford, 87 N. Y. 294 .

Protrka v. Palmer

246 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1967

See, on a related question, Moreland v. … See Rothwell v. Rothwell, 219 Or 221, 232 , 347 P2d 63 (1959), and Gooden v. Gooden, 180 Or 309 , 176 P2d 634 (1947).

Hamerlynck v. Banfield

36 Or. 436 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1900

He had a right to presume the other parties had attended to their duty in regard to placing the boards over the holes.” It is urged that the plaintiff had no right to assume that the boards were safely placed. … Justice Strahan (in Day v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKechnie

214 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1958

Board recommending a three months’ suspension. … Hargrove v. United States, 67 F2d 820, 90 ALR 1276 .

Harvey Aluminum v. School District No. 9

248 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1967

The cause is remanded for the computation of plaintiff’s liability in this latter respect. ① Sloan v. Court Hotel, 72 Cal App2d 308, 164 P2d 516 (1945); cf., Sheppard v. … State Board of Equalization, 58 Cal2d 252, 373 P2d 637 , 23 Cal Rptr 589 (1962). ⑤ See Commonwealth v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry.

Powerex Corp. v. Department of Revenue

357 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 2015

See Stevens v. … See Exelon v.

Jacksonville School District v. Crowell

33 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1898

In Hice v. … In State v.

Monastes v. Catlin

6 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

We decided in the case of Tustin v. … In that case we reviewed the cases of Thompson v. Multnomah County, 2 Or. 37 ; State of Oregon v. Officer, 4 Or. 180 , and Johns v.

Pacific Livestock Co. v. Balcombe

101 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1921

This can best be accomplished by transferring the suits to the water board for determination under the provisions of Sections 5731 et seq., Or. L. … Authority for the procedure indicated is found in Oregon Lumber Co. v. East Fork Irr. Dist., 80 Or. 568 ( 157 Pac. 963 ). Precedent for bringing in all of the parties interested is also noticed in the case of Hough v.

Norton v. State Compensation Department

252 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1968

A copy of the notice of denial shall be mailed to the board, and to the contributing employer by the department. … Terney v. Belton, 239 Or 101, 104 , 396 P2d 557 (1964).

Mansfield v. Hill

56 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1910

Diven, 31 Or. 366 ( 49 Pac. 891 ; Dean v. Dean, 42 Or. 290 ( 70 Pac. 1039 ); Reeder v. Reeder, 50 Or. 206 ( 91 Pac. 1075 ). 7. … And the decree of the county court is conclusive until vacated by appeal or impeached by a direct proceeding: Jones v. Dove, 6 Or. 188 ; Hubbard v. Hubbard, 7 Or. 42 ; Brown v. Brown, 7 Or. 285 ; Clark v.

Small v. Lutz

41 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1902

v. … Co. v. Bust, and Brown v.

Ray v. Davis

249 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968

Panning v. Gilliland, 37 Or. 369 , 61 Pac. 636 , 67 Pac. 209 (1900); Kemp v. Polk Co., 46 Or 546 , 81 Pac. 240 (1905).” … Kemp v. Polk County, 46 Or 547 , 81 P 240 (1905).

Stewart v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co.

58 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1911

boarding this very car. … In Peterson v.

Place v. FRIESEN LUMBER COMPANY

258 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1971

The Workmen’s Compensation Board entered an order affirming the award of the Hearings Officer. Prom the board’s order, plaintiff filed an appeal in the circuit court for Multnomah county. … In Graves v.

Dudley v. Franklin Life Insurance Company

250 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 1968

We read Sullivan v. Union Oil Co. of California, 1940, 16 Cal2d 229, 105 P2d 922 , and Shaw v. Board of Administration, 1952, 109 Cal App2d 770, 241 P2d 635 , to support the trial court’s decision. … Board of Administration, supra. More recently in Tucker v.

Rush v. School District No. 5

78 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1915

plaintiff’s contract was executed, because the contract for plumbing, heating and ventilating to the extent of $10,650 should have been deducted therefrom, and in support of this position relies upon the authority of Turney v. … the board of directors to keep their further expenditures within the appropriations.

Central Oregon Irrigation Co. v. Young

107 Or. 39 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1923

and later through its desert land board. … A. 113); Allred v. Smith, 135 N. C. 443 ( 47 S. E. 597 , 65 L. R. A. 924); Kamm v. Rees, 177 Fed. 14 ( 100 C. C. A. 432 ).