Case law

Gugler v. Baker County Education Service District

305 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1988

Jarvill v. City of Eugene, 289 Or 157, 165-66 , 613 P2d 1 (1980); see also Girt v. Tri-Met, 4 OTR 92, 98-100 (1970). … Sanok v. Grimes, supra, 294 Or at 697 n 21.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Loew

296 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1984

Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found the accused guilty of this charge. … Both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found the accused not guilty on this charge.

Department of Revenue v. Carpet Warehouse, Inc.

296 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1984

In Commissioners v. Sellew, supra, the county being sued was a corporate and political body. The county’s powers were exercised by a municipal board. A peremptory writ was directed against the municipal board. … In Wilson v.

Nickum v. Burckhardt

30 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1897

The corporation may elect its board of directors when one-half of the capital stock has been-subscribed: Hill’s Code, § 3222; Fairview R. R. Co. v. Spillman, 23 Or. 587 ( 32 Pac. 688 ). … Co. v. Gifford, 87 N. Y. 294 .

Donohue v. Andrews

150 Or. 652 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1935

That question was settled in Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners ( 148 Or. 50 , 34 P. (2d) 311 ) on appeal to the supreme court of the United States, decided April 1,1935, and reported in 55 S. … J. 162; Burton v. Wadley Southern R. Co., 25 Ga. App. 599 ( 103 S. E. 881 ); Saxton v. Seiberling, 48 Ohio St. 554 ( 29 N. E. 179 ); Caldwell v. Shaefer, 69 Ind. App. 188 ( 121 N. E. 549 ).

State v. Swanson

351 Or. 286 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 2011

See, e.g., Holcomb v. 12 Sunderland, 321 Or 99, 105, 894 P2d 457 (1995) (proper inquiry in interpreting statute 13 focuses on what the legislature intended at the time of enactment); see also Mastriano v. 14 Board … Hurita, 290 Or 689, 697, 625 P2d 1290 (1981) (discussing constitutional 17 implications of decriminalizing traffic infractions); Mattila v. Mason, 287 Or 235, 250, 18 598 P2d 675 (1979) (same); Brown v.

Protrka v. Palmer

246 Or. 467 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1967

See, on a related question, Moreland v. … See Rothwell v. Rothwell, 219 Or 221, 232 , 347 P2d 63 (1959), and Gooden v. Gooden, 180 Or 309 , 176 P2d 634 (1947).

State v. Stockman

30 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1896

St. 528; Fishback v. Van Dusen, 33 Minn, 111 ( 22 N. W. 244 ); State v. Bryant, 63 Md. 66 . … E. 311 ); McCabe v. McKinstry, 5 Dillon, 509 (Fed. Cas. No. 8, 667); Andrews v. Richmond, 34 Hun. 20 ; Johnston v. Browne, 37 Iowa, 200 ; Nelson v. Brown, 44 Iowa, 455 .

Murphy v. Panter

62 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1912

W. 426 ) ; Wolfe v. Nall, 62 Ala. 24 ; Conselyea v. Swift, 103 N. Y. 604 ( 9 N. E. 489 ) ; Bradley, Wheeler & Co. v. Harwi, 43 Kan. 314 ( 23 Pac. 566 ) ; Willis v. Holmes, 28 Or. 265, 269 ( 42 Pac. 989 .) 3. … See Gollnick v. Marvin, 60 Or. 312 ( 118 Pac. 1016 .)

Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident Commission

111 Or. 149 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924

The state is a contributor to the fund, and is, therefore, interested in the fund in the same manner as it is in the fund of the state board of agriculture: Tongue v. … State Board of Agriculture, 55 Or. 61 ( 105 Pac. 250 ).

Estate of Griffith

119 Or. 87 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1926

Branch v. Lambert, 103 Or. 423 ( 205 Pac. 995 ). Such strong, convincing proof does not exist here. In fact, the evidence, taken as a.whole, shows rather a preponderance of evidence against the validity of the claim. … Bean, Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

Salem Police Employees Union v. City of Salem

308 Or. 383 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1989

In Megdal v. … See Labor Board v. Katz, 369 US 736 , 82 S Ct 1107 , 8 L Ed 2d 230 (1962).

Benson v. Olcott

95 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1920

The Bean-Barrett Bill specifically designates the single law which it adopts, and as recently held in State v. … The board has ample authority to sell bonds, but the law gives the board the right to exercise its discretion in determining whether it will use that authority.

Corder v. a & J Lumber Co., Inc.

223 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1960

Defendant delivered to plaintiff during the prescribed period only 363,368 board feet of timber. In no three-months’ period did it deliver as much as 150,000 board feet. … This contention is disposed of by the case of Public Market Co. v. Portland, 171 Or 522 , 130 P2d 624 , 138 P2d 916 .

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Burrows

291 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1981

In effect, both the Trial Board and the Disciplinary Review Board found that the Oregon State Bar had not carried its burden of proof and that Burrows was not guilty of the fourth cause. We agree. … See, e.g., State v. Atteberry, 39 Or App 141 (1979); State v.

De La Montayne v. De La Montayne

131 Or. 23 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 24, 1929

This question, we thought, was settled for all time by the decision in Walker v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 122 Or. 179 ( 257 Pac. 701 ). The opinion in that case was written by Mr. … Brown, J., absent.

State v. Smith

127 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1928

State, 58 Ala. 66 ; State v. Goldman, 44 Tex. 104 ; Bibber v. Simpson, 59 Me. 181 ; Wert v. Clutter, 37 Ohio St. 347 ; People ex rel. v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 110 Ill. 180, 185 ; State v. Noyes, 47 Me. 189 . … In State v. Medical Examining Board, 32 Minn. 324 ( 20 N. W. 238 , 50 Am. Rep. 575 ), and upheld by this court in the case of State v.

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wallace

158 Or. 210 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1937

In Lindheimer v. … Co. v. Minnesota, 186 U. S. 257 , ( 46 L. Ed. 1151 , 22 S. Ct. 900 ); Public Service Gas Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com., 87 N. J. L. 581, 597, ( 94 Atl. 634 , L. R. A. 1918A 421); and see annotation Ann.

Haley v. Sprague

166 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1940

A. 548; Engle v. State Land Board 164 Or. 109 , 99 P. (2d) 1018 ; and Wood v. Sprague, 165 Or. 122 , 106 P. (2d) 287 . This practice conserves the time of the court, or the parties and of the witnesses. … In Dahlstrom v.

United States National Bank of Oregon v. Davies

274 Or. 663 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1976

Brown v. Babcock, 273 Or 351 , 540 P2d 1402, 1405 (1975); Budd v. Nixen, 6 Cal 3d 195, 98 Cal Rptr 849, 491 P2d 433 (1971). … Kohler v. Woollen, Brown & Hawkins, 15 Ill App 3d 455, 304 NE 2d 677, 680-81 (1973); Price v. Holmes, 198 Kan 100, 422 P2d 976, 980-81 (1967); Marchand v. Miazza, 151 So 2d 372, 375 (La App 1963).