Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.03s

  • Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'n

    210 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1957

    Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28, 35 , 146 P 141 . See, also, Wilson v. Empire Holding Corp., 145 Or 598, 601 , 28 P2d 843 ; Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385, 397 , 299 P 698 ; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. … Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or 213, 216 , 267 P 1070 ; Yokota v. Lindsay, 116 Or 641, 645 , 242 P 613 ; Gabel v. Armstrong, 88 Or 84, 91 , 171 P 190 ; Hanna v. Hope, 86 Or 303 , 168 P 618 ; Kreinbring v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Savastano

    354 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2013

    Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142, 117 P3d 990 (2005). … Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Sweek v. Bennett

    133 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1930

    Justice Burnett, considering a similar question, in Chance v. … He who claims that an instrument in form a deed is in reality a mortgage has a heavy burden: Jones v. Jones, 96 Or. 197 ( 189 P. 896 ); Harmon v. Grants Pass Banking & Trust Co., 60 Or. 69 , ( 118 P. 188 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Benson v. Olcott

    95 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1920

    The Bean-Barrett Bill specifically designates the single law which it adopts, and as recently held in State v. … The board has ample authority to sell bonds, but the law gives the board the right to exercise its discretion in determining whether it will use that authority.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • K. v. Health Div., Dept. of Human Resources

    277 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1977

    issued to petitioner by the State Board of Health * * * designating the sex as male and the name as” K. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed that order on appeal by the State Board of Health, which has petitioned this court for … See also Anonymous v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & Development

    295 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1983

    Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116 , 415 P2d 21 (1966); Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 (1951); Gouge v. David, 185 Or 437 , 202 P2d 489 (1949); and Sunshine Dairy v. … Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960); *427 Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, supra.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Little Walla Walla Irrig. Dist. v. Preston

    46 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1904

    Dist. v. Williams, 76 Cal. 360 ( 18 Pac. 379 ); Central Irrig. Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 ( 21 Pac. 825 ); In re Madera Irrig. Dist. 92 Cal. 296 ; In re Central Irrig. … Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 (17 Sup. Ct. 56, 41 L. Ed. 369 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Day v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    288 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1979

    After a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board closing the claim without any permanent disability award, the claimant requested a hearing. The referee and the Board awarded permanent total disability. … See Fitch v. Public Welfare Division, 279 Or 297 , 567 P2d 117 (1977). Petition dismissed as improvidently granted.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wehrung v. Denham

    42 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1903

    W. 608 ); Evans v. Graden, 125 Mo. 72 ( 28 S. W. 439 ); Bell v. Trimby (Tenn. Ch. App.), 38 S. W. 100 ; Ryan v. Morton, 65 Tex. 528; City Council of Greenville v. Ormand, 51 S. C. 121 ( 28 S. E. 147 ); Peters v. … Mackay, 20 Wash. 172 ( 54 Pac. 1122 ); Brennan v. Clark, 29 Neb. 385 ( 45 N. W. 472 ); Gray v. School Dist. 35 Neb. 438 ( 53 N. W. 377 ); Taylor v. Jeter, 23 Mo. 244 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Muir v. Morris

    80 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1916

    In the light of such cases as Wiseman v. Northern Pac. R. R. Co., 20 Or. 425 ( 26 Pac. 272 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 135 ), Jones v. Teller, 65 Or. 328 ( 133 Pac. 354 ), and Parker v. … Within the meaning of Sutherlin v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hughes v. Walker

    14 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

    It was held in Fish v. Parker, 14 La. Ann. 491 , that a judgment of dismissal is nothing more than one of nonsuit, and cannot support the plea of res adjudicata as to any of the matters at issue. … Brock was then paying the note by boarding Mx’s.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. v. State Ind. Acc. Comm.

    145 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1933

    In the case of Dahl v. … Brown v. Nevada Industrial Commission , 40 Nev. 220 ( 161 P. 516 ); Woodcock v. Board of Education , 55 Utah 458 ( 187 P. 181 , 10 A.L.R. 181 ); State ex rel. Nagy v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Oregon Stevedoring Co., Inc.

    128 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1928

    See Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 562 .” In the case of Mattison v. Lake Shore Ry. … Justice Strahan in Day v. Holland, 15 Or. 464 ( 15 Pac. 858 ), and cited with approval in Hamerlynck v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • City of Portland v. Rice

    308 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989

    See, e.g., Pace Consultants v. … See Pace Consultants v. Roberts, supra, 297 Or at 595 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State v. Reynolds

    160 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1938

    Justice Brown reviewed the previous holdings of the court; State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149, 155 , 231 P. 926 ; State v. Lil Tranchell, 119 Or. 329, 331 , 249 P. 367 ; State v. … An analogous case, illustrating the application of the rule is State v. Brown, 146 Iowa 113 , 124 N. W. 899 .

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Sondheim v. McClain

    136 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1931

    Sondheim, v. McClain et al., 132 Or. 561 ( 286 P. 590 ). … The case of State v. McClain et al., supra, was held to be controlled by the cases of Noble v. Yancey, 116 Or. 356 ( 241 P. 335 , 42 A. L. R. 1178), and Kollock v. Barnard, 116 Or. 694 ( 242 P. 847 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Calbreath v. Dunbar

    46 Or. 580 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1905

    As said in Boyd v. … .- Such are the mandatory provisions of the statute; the latter having been enacted for the express purpose of changing the policy previously prevailing, which was approved in Shattuck v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Frank v. Matthiesen

    115 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1925

    Brown v. Brown, 31 Wash. 397 ( 72 Pac. 86 , 62 L. R. A. 974). … Koehler v. Cleary, 23 Minn. 325 ; Aldrich v. Wetmore, 52 Minn. 164 ( 53 N. W. 1072 ); Woodbury v. City of Anoka, 52 Minn. 329 ( 54 N. W. 187 ).”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Boyle v. School District No. 8

    190 Or. 60 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1950

    It has been held in the following cases that a complaint, which fails to specify that such claim was presented to the school board, is insufficient: Stackpole v. School District No. 5, 9 Or. 508 ; Barrow v. … School District No. 8, 83 Or. 272 , 162 P. 789 ; Jacobberger v. School District No. 1, 114 Or. 575 , 235 P. 277 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wells v. Page

    48 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1905

    Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Hampton v. Speckenagle, 9 Serg. & R. 212 ( 11 Am. Dec. 704 ); Bigler v. Morgan, 77 N. Y. 312 ; Gray v. Smith, 83 Fed. 824 ( 28 C. C. A. 168 ); Mix v. … Beach, 46 Ill. 311 ; Wallace v. McLaughlin, 57 Ill. 53 ; Peck v. Brighton Co. 69 Ill. 200 ; Birge v. Bock, 24 Mo. App. 330 . In Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 (45 L. R.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.