Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.03s
Housley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'n
210 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 22, 1957
Whitney v. Bissell, 75 Or 28, 35 , 146 P 141 . See, also, Wilson v. Empire Holding Corp., 145 Or 598, 601 , 28 P2d 843 ; Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co., 136 Or 385, 397 , 299 P 698 ; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. … Smith v. Aplanalp, 126 Or 213, 216 , 267 P 1070 ; Yokota v. Lindsay, 116 Or 641, 645 , 242 P 613 ; Gabel v. Armstrong, 88 Or 84, 91 , 171 P 190 ; Hanna v. Hope, 86 Or 303 , 168 P 618 ; Kreinbring v.
Cited 12 timesPublished354 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2013
Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142, 117 P3d 990 (2005). … Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublished133 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 6, 1930
Justice Burnett, considering a similar question, in Chance v. … He who claims that an instrument in form a deed is in reality a mortgage has a heavy burden: Jones v. Jones, 96 Or. 197 ( 189 P. 896 ); Harmon v. Grants Pass Banking & Trust Co., 60 Or. 69 , ( 118 P. 188 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished95 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1920
The Bean-Barrett Bill specifically designates the single law which it adopts, and as recently held in State v. … The board has ample authority to sell bonds, but the law gives the board the right to exercise its discretion in determining whether it will use that authority.
Cited 3 timesPublishedK. v. Health Div., Dept. of Human Resources
277 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1977
issued to petitioner by the State Board of Health * * * designating the sex as male and the name as” K. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed that order on appeal by the State Board of Health, which has petitioned this court for … See also Anonymous v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedOchoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & Development
295 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1983
Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116 , 415 P2d 21 (1966); Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 (1951); Gouge v. David, 185 Or 437 , 202 P2d 489 (1949); and Sunshine Dairy v. … Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960); *427 Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, supra.
Cited 20 timesPublishedLittle Walla Walla Irrig. Dist. v. Preston
46 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1904
Dist. v. Williams, 76 Cal. 360 ( 18 Pac. 379 ); Central Irrig. Dist. v. De Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 ( 21 Pac. 825 ); In re Madera Irrig. Dist. 92 Cal. 296 ; In re Central Irrig. … Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 (17 Sup. Ct. 56, 41 L. Ed. 369 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDay v. State Accident Insurance Fund
288 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1979
After a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board closing the claim without any permanent disability award, the claimant requested a hearing. The referee and the Board awarded permanent total disability. … See Fitch v. Public Welfare Division, 279 Or 297 , 567 P2d 117 (1977). Petition dismissed as improvidently granted.
Cited 4 timesPublished42 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1903
W. 608 ); Evans v. Graden, 125 Mo. 72 ( 28 S. W. 439 ); Bell v. Trimby (Tenn. Ch. App.), 38 S. W. 100 ; Ryan v. Morton, 65 Tex. 528; City Council of Greenville v. Ormand, 51 S. C. 121 ( 28 S. E. 147 ); Peters v. … Mackay, 20 Wash. 172 ( 54 Pac. 1122 ); Brennan v. Clark, 29 Neb. 385 ( 45 N. W. 472 ); Gray v. School Dist. 35 Neb. 438 ( 53 N. W. 377 ); Taylor v. Jeter, 23 Mo. 244 .
Cited 12 timesPublished80 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1916
In the light of such cases as Wiseman v. Northern Pac. R. R. Co., 20 Or. 425 ( 26 Pac. 272 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 135 ), Jones v. Teller, 65 Or. 328 ( 133 Pac. 354 ), and Parker v. … Within the meaning of Sutherlin v.
Cited 15 timesPublished14 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887
It was held in Fish v. Parker, 14 La. Ann. 491 , that a judgment of dismissal is nothing more than one of nonsuit, and cannot support the plea of res adjudicata as to any of the matters at issue. … Brock was then paying the note by boarding Mx’s.
Cited 4 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. v. State Ind. Acc. Comm.
145 Or. 443 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1933
In the case of Dahl v. … Brown v. Nevada Industrial Commission , 40 Nev. 220 ( 161 P. 516 ); Woodcock v. Board of Education , 55 Utah 458 ( 187 P. 181 , 10 A.L.R. 181 ); State ex rel. Nagy v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedJohnson v. Oregon Stevedoring Co., Inc.
128 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1928
See Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 562 .” In the case of Mattison v. Lake Shore Ry. … Justice Strahan in Day v. Holland, 15 Or. 464 ( 15 Pac. 858 ), and cited with approval in Hamerlynck v.
Cited 8 timesPublished308 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989
See, e.g., Pace Consultants v. … See Pace Consultants v. Roberts, supra, 297 Or at 595 .
Cited 15 timesPublished160 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1938
Justice Brown reviewed the previous holdings of the court; State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149, 155 , 231 P. 926 ; State v. Lil Tranchell, 119 Or. 329, 331 , 249 P. 367 ; State v. … An analogous case, illustrating the application of the rule is State v. Brown, 146 Iowa 113 , 124 N. W. 899 .
Cited 22 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Sondheim v. McClain
136 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1931
Sondheim, v. McClain et al., 132 Or. 561 ( 286 P. 590 ). … The case of State v. McClain et al., supra, was held to be controlled by the cases of Noble v. Yancey, 116 Or. 356 ( 241 P. 335 , 42 A. L. R. 1178), and Kollock v. Barnard, 116 Or. 694 ( 242 P. 847 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished46 Or. 580 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1905
As said in Boyd v. … .- Such are the mandatory provisions of the statute; the latter having been enacted for the express purpose of changing the policy previously prevailing, which was approved in Shattuck v.
Cited 2 timesPublished115 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1925
Brown v. Brown, 31 Wash. 397 ( 72 Pac. 86 , 62 L. R. A. 974). … Koehler v. Cleary, 23 Minn. 325 ; Aldrich v. Wetmore, 52 Minn. 164 ( 53 N. W. 1072 ); Woodbury v. City of Anoka, 52 Minn. 329 ( 54 N. W. 187 ).”
Cited 12 timesPublishedBoyle v. School District No. 8
190 Or. 60 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1950
It has been held in the following cases that a complaint, which fails to specify that such claim was presented to the school board, is insufficient: Stackpole v. School District No. 5, 9 Or. 508 ; Barrow v. … School District No. 8, 83 Or. 272 , 162 P. 789 ; Jacobberger v. School District No. 1, 114 Or. 575 , 235 P. 277 .
Cited 1 timesPublished48 Or. 74 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1905
Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Hampton v. Speckenagle, 9 Serg. & R. 212 ( 11 Am. Dec. 704 ); Bigler v. Morgan, 77 N. Y. 312 ; Gray v. Smith, 83 Fed. 824 ( 28 C. C. A. 168 ); Mix v. … Beach, 46 Ill. 311 ; Wallace v. McLaughlin, 57 Ill. 53 ; Peck v. Brighton Co. 69 Ill. 200 ; Birge v. Bock, 24 Mo. App. 330 . In Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 (45 L. R.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna