Case law

Peters v. Central Labor Council

179 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1946

The “Employees Association” filed a petition with the Labor Board for an election. … After the “Association” was disbanded, the Board denied the petition for an election.

State v. Reynolds

160 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1938

Justice Brown reviewed the previous holdings of the court; State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149, 155 , 231 P. 926 ; State v. Lil Tranchell, 119 Or. 329, 331 , 249 P. 367 ; State v. … An analogous case, illustrating the application of the rule is State v. Brown, 146 Iowa 113 , 124 N. W. 899 .

State v. Futch

324 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1996

The trial court held that that scientific technique satisfied the standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence articulated by this court in State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). … State v. Futch, 123 Or App 176 , 860 P2d 264 (1993). The sole issue on review is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s ruling admitting the state’s RFLP DNA evidence. It did not. See State v.

Methodist Book Concern v. State Tax Commission

186 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1949

Board of Education v. Illinois, 203 U. S. 553 , 51 L. ed. 314. In People v. Woman’s Home Missionary Soc. of M. E. … Rahoutis v.

Johnson v. Oregon Stevedoring Co., Inc.

128 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1928

See Walker v. Cronin, 107 Mass. 562 .” In the case of Mattison v. Lake Shore Ry. … Justice Strahan in Day v. Holland, 15 Or. 464 ( 15 Pac. 858 ), and cited with approval in Hamerlynck v.

K. v. Health Div., Dept. of Human Resources

277 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1977

issued to petitioner by the State Board of Health * * * designating the sex as male and the name as” K. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed that order on appeal by the State Board of Health, which has petitioned this court for … See also Anonymous v.

Hughes v. Walker

14 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

It was held in Fish v. Parker, 14 La. Ann. 491 , that a judgment of dismissal is nothing more than one of nonsuit, and cannot support the plea of res adjudicata as to any of the matters at issue. … Brock was then paying the note by boarding Mx’s.

Wehrung v. Denham

42 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1903

W. 608 ); Evans v. Graden, 125 Mo. 72 ( 28 S. W. 439 ); Bell v. Trimby (Tenn. Ch. App.), 38 S. W. 100 ; Ryan v. Morton, 65 Tex. 528; City Council of Greenville v. Ormand, 51 S. C. 121 ( 28 S. E. 147 ); Peters v. … Mackay, 20 Wash. 172 ( 54 Pac. 1122 ); Brennan v. Clark, 29 Neb. 385 ( 45 N. W. 472 ); Gray v. School Dist. 35 Neb. 438 ( 53 N. W. 377 ); Taylor v. Jeter, 23 Mo. 244 .

Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.

305 Or. 472 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1988

In Hanson v. … See Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Dept. of Human Res., 297 Or 562, 569-70 , 687 P2d 785 (1984) (disapproving agency’s deference to Emergency Board on statutory issue).

Moore v. Willamette Iron & Steel Works

127 Or. 134 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1928

BROWN, J. … You will devote all of your time and attention to the sale of these carriers, subject to the direction of the officers and board of directors of this company.

Day v. State Accident Insurance Fund

288 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1979

After a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board closing the claim without any permanent disability award, the claimant requested a hearing. The referee and the Board awarded permanent total disability. … See Fitch v. Public Welfare Division, 279 Or 297 , 567 P2d 117 (1977). Petition dismissed as improvidently granted.

In Re Traaen's Estate

154 Or. 263 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1936

Section 11-502, supra, has been construed in Brown v. Drake, supra, as to require all claims to be presented before the final settlement of the estate, and if not so presented they’ become forever barred. … Hicky v. Stallworth, supra. The above principles were followed in Brown v. Drake, supra. The judgment of the circuit court should be, and it hereby is, affirmed. Kelly and Belt, JJ., not sitting.

Olds v. Kirkpatrick

183 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1948

On the other hand, where a licensing board does assign a valid reason for refusing to grant a license, the courts, in the absence of a showing that the action of the board was an abuse of its clear legal duty in the premises … , will not assume that the reason assigned by the board was lacking in substance.

Muir v. Morris

80 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1916

In the light of such cases as Wiseman v. Northern Pac. R. R. Co., 20 Or. 425 ( 26 Pac. 272 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 135 ), Jones v. Teller, 65 Or. 328 ( 133 Pac. 354 ), and Parker v. … Within the meaning of Sutherlin v.

State v. Savastano

354 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 2013

Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142, 117 P3d 990 (2005). … Co. v.

Elliott v. Wallowa County

57 Or. 236 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1910

Loeb, 68 Ind. 29 ; Board of Commissioners of Orange County v. Hon, 87 Ind. 356 . In Board of Commissioners of Fountain County v. … But in the subsequent case of Board of Commissioners of Orange Co. v.

Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & Development

295 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1983

Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116 , 415 P2d 21 (1966); Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 (1951); Gouge v. David, 185 Or 437 , 202 P2d 489 (1949); and Sunshine Dairy v. … Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960); *427 Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, supra.

State v. Johnston

143 Or. 395 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1933

State v. Browning, 47 Or. 470 ( 82 P. 955 ). … State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147 ( 41 P. 1042 ).

City of Portland v. Rice

308 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989

See, e.g., Pace Consultants v. … See Pace Consultants v. Roberts, supra, 297 Or at 595 .

Sargent v. American Bank & Trust Co.

80 Or. 16 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1916

In the case of Brown v. Schleier, 118 Fed. 986 ( 55 C. C. … It was held in Poppleton v.