Case law

Brown v. EBI Companies

289 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

We hold only that a finding of "good cause” was not foreclosed by our decision in Sekermestrovich v. SAIF, as the Board appears to have thought. … It is therefore necessary to return this case to the Board. Reversed and remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board.

Brown v. Kotek

Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 2024

Specifically, Article V, section 14, of the Oregon Constitution provides, in part: 266 Brown v. … authority to impose conditions without a commutee’s consent. 268 Brown v.

Brown v. EBI Companies

289 Or. 905 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1980

PER CURIAM In Brown v. … If the claimant "prevails finally in a hearing before the referee or in a review by the board itself,” ORS 656.386, supra, directs the referee or board to allow a reasonable attorney fee.

State v. Brown

252 Or. 568 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

The smaller man observed in the burglary had brown hair, as did defendant. No fingerprints were found at the place of the burglary but cloth imprints were observed. Cotton gloves were found in the vehicle.

Elfstrom v. Brown

229 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1961

Brown (party of the second part). … The agreement entered into between plaintiffs and Don A Brown on March 16, 1946, under which the latter was to conduct *602 the glazing business, provided that Brown “does hereby accept a franchise for the purpose of operating

Goldsmith v. Brown

5 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

Brown v. Seidl

236 Or. 212 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1963

Brown v. O'Flynn

127 Or. 497 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

Simon v. Brown

5 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

Brown, the defendant. Then follows a prayer for a writ of mandamus commanding the Treasurer to reduce said currency in the General Fund to coin, and to pay said warrant, with the interest due thereon. … (Griswold v. National Insurance Co., 3 Cowen, 96.)

Spalding v. Brown

32 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1897

weight of it with any greater degree of certainty than did the trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses, noted their manner, tone and bearing while on the stand, and having reached the conclusion that King loaned to Brown

Brown, Adm'x v. Gessler

191 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1951

Brown and Mildred C. … Brown, one of the plaintiffs, died, and Mildred C. Brown, as administratrix of the estate of the said William P. Brown, deceased, has been substituted as a party plaintiff.

Bays v. Brown

160 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1938

From Seed v. … Beard, 12 Or. 447 ( 8 Pac. 537 ); Bennett v. Minott, 28 Or. 339 ( 39 Pac. 997 , 44 Pac. 288 ); Morton v.

Gynther v. Brown & McCabe

67 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1913

And when so determined that intention will control the actual language used: Wyatt v. Wyatt, 31 Or. 531 ( 49 Pac. 855 ); Patterson v. Patterson, 40 Or. 560 ( 67 Pac. 664 ); Holmes v. … Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ), we think no error was committed. For the reasons herein stated our conviction is the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered. Affirmed. Mr.

Brown, Adm'r v. Miles

193 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1951

Moody v. Baker, 142 Or 559, 562 , 20 P2d 1069 ; 13 RCL, Homestead, 688, § 148. … Iltz v. Krieger, 104 Or 59, 65 , 202 P 409 , 206 P 550 .

Brown & Co. v. Rathburn

10 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1882

(Brandt on Suretyship and Guaranty, secs. 17, 384 and 386; Rogers v. School Trustees, 46 Ill., 428 ; Hubbard v. Gusney, 64 N. Y., 457 .)

Sing On v. Brown

44 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1903

The *13 settlement alone constitutes a sufficient consideration to uphold the compromise or contract: Smith v. Farra, 21 Or. 395 ( 28 Pac. 241 , 20 L. R. A. 115); McGlynn v. Scott, 4 N. D. 18 ( 58 N. W. 460 ). … Brown.

Nelson v. Brown & McCabe

81 Or. 472 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1916

The authorities on this subject are collated in Marks v. Columbia County Lumber Co., 77 Or. 22 ( 149 Pac. 1041 ). *476 3.

Snyder v. ESPINO-BROWN

349 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 2010

243 P.3d 69 (2010) 349 Or. 171 SNYDER v. ESPINO-BROWN. (S058520). Supreme Court of Oregon. October 7, 2010. Petition for review allowed.

Linn County v. Brown

366 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 2020

The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. 336 Linn County v. Brown BALMER, J. … Linn County v. Brown, 297 Or App 330, 342, 443 P3d 700 (2019) (emphasis in origi- nal).

Snyder v. Espino-Brown

350 Or. 141 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

Snyder v. Espino-Brown, 235 Or App 82, 87 , 230 P3d 122 (2010). … In Duncan v.