Case law

Vawter v. Rogue River Valley Canning Co.

124 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1928

As a general rule a corporation can act only through its board of directors at a regularly called meeting. The corporation ordinarily speaks through its records. In Doernbecher v. C. C. L. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co.

288 Or. 337 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

The Workers’ Compensation Board (WCB) held, however, that neither the employer nor SAIF is liable, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Inkley v. … The Court of Appeals in Gronquist v.

State v. Turner

34 Or. 173 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

the tow : Wilson v. … In Chapman v. Jackson, 9 Rich.

Tye v. McFetridge

342 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2006

(board). … Marshall’s Towing v. Department of State Police, 339 Or 54, 62 , 116 P3d 873 (2005).

Tyler v. Trustees of Tualatin Academy

14 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1887

being issued; that the board took no action upon the catalogues except to pay the bills therefor, as they could not come before the board as a board until the June following their publication. … Judge Fields said correctly, in Gas Co. v.

Clark v. FAZIO

191 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1951

Lyons v. Browning et al., 170 Or. 350, 354 , 133 P. 2d 599 ; Arthur v. Parish, 150 Or. 582 , 47 P. 2d 682 ; Trimmins v. Hale, 122 Or. 24 , 256 P. 770 . In Lyons v. Browning et al., supra, Mr. … Lyons v. Browning et al., supra; Lampa v. Hakola, 152 Or. 626, 630 , 55 P. 2d 13 ; Arthur v. Parish, supra; Karberg v. Leahy, 144 Or. 687, 692 , 26 P. 2d 56 ; Shain v.

Christie v. Paulus

292 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1982

“Question: Shall Forestry Board’s sustained yield management policy for state timber be changed and set into law and Board be restructured? … Megdal v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lasswell

296 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1983

See State v. Robertson/Young, 293 Or 402, 412, 416-417, 433-434 , 649 P2d 569 (1982); State v. Spencer, 289 Or 225, 228 , 611 P2d 1147 (1980). … Chicago Council of Lawyers v. Bauer, 522 F2d 242 (7th Cir 1975), cert den sub nom Cunningham v. Chicago Council of Lawyers, 427 US 912 , 96 S Ct 3201 , 49 L Ed 2d 1204 (1976). 3 The board’s observation is well taken.

Elmore Packing Co. v. Tillamook County

55 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909

.; Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co., 30 Or. 250 ( 47 Pac. 852 ) ; Fisher v. Union County, 43 Or. 223 ( 72 Pac. 797 ) ; Holmes v. Cole, 51 Or. 483 ( 94 Pac. 964 .) 2. … City of Portland, 25 Or. 297 ( 35 Pac. 665 ) ; Oregon Coal Co. v. Coos Bay, 30 Or. 308 ( 47 Pac. 850 .) 5. As stated in Garnsey v.

Clatsop County v. Oregon American Lumber Co.

155 Or. 551 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1937

See, also, to the same effect, State Board of Equalization v. People, 191 Ill. 528 , 61 N. E. 339 , 58 L. R. A. 513, and People v. Bourne, 242 Ill. 61 , 89 N. E. 690 . … Bank v. Holmes, supra; State Board of Equalization v. People, supra; Burton Stock Car. Co. v.

Miller v. Wattier

44 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1904

Justice Boise in Corpe v. … To the same purpose is Robertson v. State Land Board, 42 Or. 183 ( 70 Pac. 614 ). 2.

Varner v. Portland Trust Bank

210 Or. 658 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1957

Iltz v. Krieger, 104 Or 59, 65 , 202 P 409 , 206 P 550 ; Brown v. Miles, 193 Or 466, 479 , 238 P2d 761 . … Benedict v. Lee, supra ( 198 Or 387 ); Brown v. Miles, supra ( 193 Or 479 ).

Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48J

334 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 2002

The Board reversed the AU, noting that the case relied on by the ALJ, SAIF v. … The Board explained, relying on Dietz v.

Buell v. Jefferson County Court

175 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1944

Arant v. Lane, supra; Duncan Townsite Company v. Lane, supra; Duke v. Turner, 204 U. S. 623 , 51 L. E. 652, 27 S. Ct. 316 , 9 Ann. Cas. 842; Board of Education v. … Board of Education v.

Bacon v. HARRIS

221 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

Although it is not named as a defendant we think this is, in legal effect, an action against the State Board of Higher Education and will so treat it. See State ex rel Kleinsorge v. … We have recently held in James & Yost, Inc. v. State Board of *557 Higher Edu., 216 Or 598 , 340 P2d 577 , that the state of Oregon has not waived its immunity as to the State Board of Higher Education.

Lewis v. CIGNA Insurance

339 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board), in a divided decision, reversed the AL J’s order and approved the denial of the claim. The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s decision. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins. … Insurer cross-petitioned, arguing that the board lacked authority to consider claimant’s challenge to the noncooperation denials. The Court of Appeals agreed with insurer. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins.

Bayless v. Douglas County

57 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1910

Said board shall make alterations and changes in the same when petitioned so to do, in the manner hereinafter specified.” In School District v. … In Small v.

State Ex Rel. Eckles v. Woolley

302 Or. 37 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1986

In Cook v. … In a suit by creditors of a private association which had conveyed land to the board for a site for the university, Dunn v.

Newton v. McKeel

142 Or. 674 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1933

Dice v. McCauley, 22 Or. 456 ( 30 P. 160 ); Andrews v. … Rep. 845 ); King v. Brigham, 19 Or. 560 ( 25 P. 150 ); Dunnigan v. Wood, 58 Or. 119 ( 112 P. 531 ); Anderson v. Richards, 100 Or. 641 ( 198 P. 570 ).

Wood v. Young

127 Or. 235 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1928

*237 BROWN, J. … “To Oregon Surety & Casualty Company, “Board of Trade Building*, “Portland, Oregon.”