Case law

Tilford v. Page

307 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1969

Our Circuit has recently treated with this general matter in the case of Brown v. United States, 380 F.2d 477 (Tenth Cir. 1967). … Maxwell v. Turner, supra; Ortiz v. Baker, 411 F.2d 263 (Tenth Cir. 1969); Jolly v. Crouse, 411 F.2d 808 (Tenth Cir. 1969); Day v. Page, 411 F. 2d 810 (Tenth Cir. 1969).

Thompson v. Hicks

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 7, 2024

Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1231 n.7 (10th Cir. 2013) (addressing the scope of the payment obligation under the PLRA). … v. Thomas E. Mestmaker & Assocs., Inc., 552 F.3d 1233, 1236 (10th Cir. 2009); see also Robledo-Valdez v. Smelser, 593 F.

J. D. Simmons, Inc. v. Alliance Corp.

79 F.R.D. 547 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1978

Co. v. … V. McGinnis Theatres & Pay T.V., Inc. v.

Mission Air Support Inc v. KSNL Aero LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2022

Gonzales v. Brown, No. 12-CV-495-JED-PJC, 2014 WL 4748604, at *5 (N.D. Okla. Sept. 23, 2014). In addition to being procedurally improper, the substantive arguments made in Plaintiff’s motion are unpersuasive. … v. Intercontinental Jet Serv. Corp., 328 P.3d 1223, 1229 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014).

Jackson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 17, 2025

Co. v. Quine, 264 P.3d 1245, 1249 (Okla. 2011); see also Ball v. Wilshire Ins. Co., 221 P.3d 717, 725 (Okla. 2009); Brown v. Patel, 157 P.3d 117, 126-27 (Okla. 2007). … Brown, 157 P.3d at 122 (emphasis in original).

Roper v. Oklahoma State of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 19, 2024

See Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1162 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.”); Quern v. … See Fogle v.

Petties v. Crow

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 15, 2024

Takemire v. Novak, 57 F. App’x 385, 387 (10th Cir. 2003) (citing Hoggro v. Boone, 150 F.3d 1223, 1225–26 (10th Cir. 1998)). … P. 41(b) of § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice was “tantamount to a dismissal with prejudice because the one-year statute of limitations bars [petitioner] from refiling his [habeas] petition”); Brown v.

Crenshaw v. Stitt

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 24, 2025

See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. … No. 32], GRANTS Defendants Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board and Oklahoma Attorney General Drummond’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc.

Poarch v. Unit Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 13, 2025

Tex.). 6 Pet Milk Co. v. Ritter, 323 F.2d 586, 588 (10th Cir. 1963) (quoting Landis v. … Brown, 348 F.2d 689, 692 (10th Cir. 1965). Second, a stay would minimize the risks of confusion and inconsistent results. If Judge Hanks affirms, this case may proceed unimpeded.

Arndt v. Hatfield

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2020

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1161 n.5 (10th Cir. 2011). Furthermore, Plaintiff is not entitled to declaratory relief against any of the state actor Defendants in his or her individual capacity. … Accordingly, Defendant Brown is entitled to dismissal of the claims against him in his individual capacity.

Hayes v. Crow

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 2, 2023

See United States v. … P. 41(b) of § 2254 habeas petition without prejudice was “tantamount to a dismissal with prejudice because the one-year statute of limitations bars [petitioner] from refiling his [habeas] petition”); Brown v.

McCord v. Oklahoma State of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2022

Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113 (2002). 4 Porter v. Allbaugh, 672 F. App’x 851, 856 (10th Cir. 2016) (quoting Holland v. … Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649 (2010)). 5 Yang v. Archuleta, 525 F.3d 925, 928 (10th Cir. 2008) (quoting Brown v.

HILDEBRAND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 12, 2025

Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). … Mobley v. Donahoe, 498 F. App’x 793, 796 (10th Cir. 2012) (quoting Brown v. Gen. Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); also citing Ford v. West, 222 F.3d 767, 772-73 (10th Cir. 2000) and Belhomme v.

Garinger

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2026

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). 5 Alvarado v. KOB–TV, L.L.C., 493 F.3d 1210, 1215 (10th Cir. 2007) (quoting David v. … Oct. 8, 2025) (citing Manley v. Brown, 989 P.2d 448, 452 (Okla. 1999)). 13 Mot. (Dkt. 14), at 2–3. 12, 2023, and December 20, 2023,!

Saner v. Healthcare Computer Corp.

879 F. Supp. 1116 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1994

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); Manders v. State of Oklahoma, 875 F.2d 263, 264 (10th Cir.1989). … Plaintiff relies on Burk v.

Cloud v. Illinois Insurance Exchange

701 F. Supp. 197 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1988

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). If there can be but one reasonable conclusion as to the material facts, summary judgment is appropriate. … Id. § 1101(B); see DeWees v. Cedarbaum, 381 P.2d 830, 837 (Okla.1963); Winston-Norris Co. v.

RANDALL EDWARD FLETCHER v. RICK WHITTEN, et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2025

As the Supreme Court explained in [Sandin v. … Wolff v.

Clothier v. Health Care Service Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 9, 2022

Corp. v. … See Rivero v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of N.M., No. 16-0318 JB\SCY, 2019 WL 1085179, at *58-62 (D.N.M. Mar. 7, 2019)(Browning, J.).

Hall v. Miller

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2025

Cisneros v. Gomez, No. CIV-21- 825-PRW, 2023 WL 2543435, at *1 (W.D. Okla. Mar. 16, 2023) (citing Summers v. … App’x 755, 756-57 (10th Cir. 2011) (unpublished) (explaining that a habeas petition “denied as time-barred” is “‘a dismissal . . . on the merits’’) (citing cases); Brown v. Roberts, 177 F.

Rogers v. Stephens County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 14, 2022

Gauthier v. Hunt, No. CIV-20-1153- J, 2021 WL 1886297, at *2 (W.D. Okla. … See Waller v.