Case law

Rucker v. Meachum

513 F. Supp. 32 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 21, 1980

In the recent case of Shirley v. … In Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215 , 96 S.Ct. 2532 , 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976) and *34 Montanye v.

Hastings

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 24, 2026

Brown v. ScriptPro, LLC, 700 F.3d 1222, 1226 (10th Cir. 2012). … Brown v. ScriptPro, LLC, 700 F.3d 1222, 1227 (10th Cir. 2012). Plaintiff was terminated the day after (or the same day) he notified Defendants of his intent to take future leave. [Doc. No. 1] ¶¶ 30-31.

Oklahoma Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

33 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 28, 1940

This position cannot be maintained in view of the decision reached in Matson Navigation Co. et al. v. … This case went to the Supreme Court of the United States, Matson Navigation Co. et al. v.

Sledge v. Carlson

405 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1975

Bethea v. Crouse, 417 F.2d 504 (CA10 1969); Graham v. Willingham, 384 F.2d 367 (CA10 1967). Segregation, as such, is not cruel or unusual punishment. Graham v. Willingham, supra; Adams v. … Board of Managers of New Jersey State Prison, 407 F.2d 937 (CA3 1969).

In re Longhorn Securities Litigation

573 F. Supp. 255 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1983

The plaintiffs here do not allege that they were injured uniquely by the board of directors’ negligence. … Each one of the Bank’s creditors and uninsured depositors could also claim that but for the board’s negligence they would not have suffered their respective losses. E.

Town of Okeene ex rel. Burgard v. Kratz

45 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 13, 1942

Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County v. Sutton, 185 Okl. 665 , 95 P.2d 648 , and Flint v. Board of Com’rs of Tulsa County, 188 Okl. 628 , 112 P.2d 157 . … In Falcone v.

Champlin Refining Co. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission

25 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1938

Sweet v. United States, 8 Cir., 228 F. 421 , 423: “And when a statute is plain and its meaning is certain, construction has no place or office. … S. v. Fisk, 3 Wall. 445 , 70 U.S. 445 , 18 L.Ed. 243 ; Petri v. Creelman Lumber Company, 199 U.S. 487 , 26 S.Ct. 133 , 50 L.Ed. 281 ; Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise Board, Okl.Sup., 82 P.2d 225 .

Cimarron Alliance Foundation v. City of Oklahoma City

290 F. Supp. 2d 1252 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 13, 2002

Board of County Commissioners, 85 F.3d 489, 493 (10th Cir.1996), CAF’s complaint as to Defendant Couch in his individual capacity is DISMISSED. … Brown v. Palmer, 915 F.2d 1435, 1441 (10th Cir.1990). In Perry Education Ass’n v.

Bonilla v. Gerlach

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 6, 2024

Apr. 18, 2019) (explaining that the defendant’s authority “speaks to duties, not liability” and finding “that Oklahoma law does not preclude the Board from liability at this stage”); Palmer v. Bd. of Cnty. … See Lopez v.

Mendez

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 3, 2026

An appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals is due within 30 days. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b); see also Amica Ctr. for Immigrant Rts. v. Exec. Off. for Immigr. Rev., 822 F. … But those efforts likely relate to his appeal from the Immigration Court to the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Beavers v. Victorian

38 F. Supp. 3d 1260 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 27, 2014

See Brown v. Truck Connections Int’l, Inc., 526 F.Supp.2d 920, 924-25 (E.D.Ark.2007). While most cases have involved corporate employers of commercial truck drivers, the same rule may apply to a sole proprietorship. … Inc. v.

Pena

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026

the alien is permitted to seek review of such order by the Board of Immigration Appeals”). … Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001)). IV. Under Santillan Quiroz v.

BB Energy USA Llc v. Keyera Energy Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 5, 2023

Middleton v. Stephenson, 749 F.3d 1197, 1200 (10th Cir. 2014); Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc., 248 F. Supp. 3d 1081, 1108 (D.N.M. 2017). … Energy Co. v.

Loving v. United States

32 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1940

See Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United States, 300 U.S. 297 , 57 S.Ct. 478 , 81 L.Ed. 659 ; Mississippi Valley Barge Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282 , 54 S. Ct. 692 , 78 L.Ed. 1260 ; Western Paper Makers’ Chemical Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 246 U.S. 457 , 38 S.Ct. 383 , 62 L.Ed. 831 ; Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 351 , 35 S.Ct. 370 , 59 L.Ed. 616 .

Black Emergency Response Team v. OConnor

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 19, 2023

Bridge v. Okla. State Dep’t of Educ., No. CIV-22-787-JD, 2022 WL 20689557, at *2 (W.D. Okla. Dec. 20, 2022) (citing LCvR 7.1(i)). … Litig., 776 F.3d 1103, 1119 (10th Cir. 2015); see also Stevens v. Water Dist. One of Johnson Cnty., 561 F. Supp. 2d 1224, 1232 (D. Kan. 2008).

Wray v. Kirkland

527 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1981

In Wells v. … Bennett v. Passic, 545 F.2d 1260 (10th Cir. 1976).

Adkins v. Martin

699 F. Supp. 1510 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 16, 1988

Brown v. Smith, 828 F.2d 1493, 1495 (10th Cir.1987). In Hewitt v. … Spence v. Farrier, 807 F.2d 753, 755 (8th Cir.1986). In Peranzo v.

Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2025

P. 6(b)(1)(B); see also Perez v. … See [ssa v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Standard Life Corp.

68 F.R.D. 598 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 16, 1975

On August 26, 1975, the Court granted the request for an Order approving a plan for the maintenance of Standard Life Corporation and appointed a Special Supervisor and an Advisory Board for Standard Life Corporation. … The only case cited by Defendant, Diamond v. United States, 267 F.2d 23 (Fifth Cir. 1959) cert. den. 361 U.S. 834 , 80 S.Ct. 85 , 4 L.Ed.2d 75 is not applicable to the facts of this case.

Hughes v. Oklahoma

426 F. Supp. 36 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1976

In Brown v. … In Latham v.