Case law

United States v. Miller

526 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 1981

Lanza v. New York, 370 U.S. 139, 142-144 , 82 S.Ct. 1218, 1220-21 , 8 L.Ed.2d 384 (1962); United States v. Lilly, 576 F.2d 1240, 1244 (Fifth Cir. 1978); Daugherty v. … United States v. Kelley, supra.

Holley v. Bingman

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 9, 2024

ballots); § 8-101 (State Election Board certifies list of nominees); § 8-103 (State Election Board certifies list of successful candidates for office). … Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S. 767, 781 (1974). See also Bullock v.

Six v. Henry

796 F. Supp. 1448 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 22, 1992

See, Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 58 F.R.D. 348, 353 (S.D.N.Y.1973); United States v. Kohler Co., 9 F.R.D. 289, 291 (E.D.Pa.1949). … Corp. v. Druffel, 301 F.2d 126 , 129 (6th Cir.1962); State of Maryland v. Pan-American Bus Lines, Inc., 1 F.R.D. 213, 214 (D.Md.1940).

Locke Supply Company v. Oklahoma City City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 16, 2025

On February 14, 2024, the matter came before the Board, which voted 3-0 to deny the appeal. … In addition to appealing the Board’s determination, Locke brings, among other things, a constitutional claim, arguing that Section 50-14 violates the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Daly v. Stotts

126 F. Supp. 555 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1954

Love v. Chandler, 8 Cir., 1942, 124 F.2d 785 . Cf. Lyons v. Baker, 5 Cir., 1950, 180 F.2d 893 . . In Viles v. … Watkins v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, 8 Cir., 1950, 183 F.2d 440, 442 . Accord, Allen v. Corsano, D.C.Del.1944, 56 F.Supp. 169 ; Shemaitis v. Froemke, 7 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 963 . . Watkins v.

United States v. French

414 F. Supp. 800 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 5, 1976

There was no actual trespass by the government resulting in the presence of the “beeper” on board Jacobs’ truck. … Air Pollution Variance Board of Colorado v. Western Alfalfa Corporation, 416 U.S. 861 , 94 S.Ct. 2114 , 40 L.Ed.2d 607 (1974).

Williamson v. Williamson

306 F. Supp. 516 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 5, 1969

Druen v. Druen, 247 F.Supp. 754 (Colo. 1965); Garberson v. Garberson, 82 F.Supp. 706 (Iowa 1949); Bowman v. … In McCarty v.

Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 11, 2024

See Monnell v. … See, e.g., Schupper v. Cafasso, 708 F.

Daniels v. CL FRATES AND CO.

641 F. Supp. 2d 1214 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 23, 2009

In Miner v. … Brown, 1986 OK 3 , 715 P.2d 74 , involving a supervisor and foreman ridiculing the plaintiff in the workplace; Anderson v.

Morton v. Moore City of

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 8, 2025

Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) and Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … (quoting Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1161 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016)) (brackets omitted). And Plaintiff cites to neither constitutional amendment nor federal statute to support her § 1983 claim.

Anderson v. Dow Agrosciences LLC

262 F. Supp. 2d 1280 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 14, 2003

Plaintiffs admit that, except for plaintiff Lovell, none of the plaintiffs notified the Board of Agriculture about the damage to their crops. … See e.g., Netland v.

Resolute Insurance v. Seventh Judicial District Court

336 F. Supp. 497 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1971

In Fahey v. … See Waite v. Burgess, 69 Nev. 230 , 245 P.2d 994 ; State ex rel. Kostas v. Johnson, 224 Ind. 540 , 69 N.E.2d 592 ; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe v. Long, 122 Okl. 86 , 251 P. 486 ; McConnell v.

O'BRYAN v. Chandler

249 F. Supp. 51 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1964

The Supreme Court in Conley v. … As the Supreme Court said in Brown v.

Bauder v. Fudge

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 10, 2019

Ward v. Province, 283 F.Appx at 618; see also Clark v. Fallin, 654 F. App'x 385, 388 (10th Cir. … The Tenth Circuit has held that the Oklahoma Board of Pardon and Parole “has discretion to decide whether to consider an offender for clemency, so there is no constitutionally protected liberty interest.” Ward v.

Blackburn v. Oklahoma City VA Health Center

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2025

Hannah v. United States, 523 F.3d 597, 600 (5th Cir. 2008); Rachel v. Troutt, 829 F.3d 398-99 (10th Cir. 2016); Gov’t’s Resp. (Doc. No. 52) at 2. … Brown v. Gray, No. 06-3003, 2011 WL 6091738, at *7 (D. Kan. Dec. 7, 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). This Motion (Doc.

Warden

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 25, 2026

No. 19, Att. 3, at 1]; Martin v. Dep't of Corr., No. CIV-23-00912-PRW, 2024 WL 4257135, at *1 n.2 (W.D. Okla. … See Buhl v. Berkebile, 597 F.

Winfrey v. Louthan

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 9, 2024

See Fisher v. … Cherry v. Whitten, No. CIV-20-677-PRW, 2023 WL 4542520, at *5 (W.D. Okla. July 14, 2023) (quoting Brown v. Farris, 2021 WL 4786411, at *1 (10th Cir. Oct. 14, 2021)).

Tinsley

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 25, 2026

Habteselassie v. … Brown’s potential testimony and made the “final decision” not to call her as a witness at trial. Doc. 18, Ex. 13, at 58. equate to newly discovered evidence.5 Cf. Klein v.

Powell v. Miller

104 F. Supp. 3d 1298 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2015

The parole board granted pre-parole status to Smith on October 24,1995. … Marsh v.

Simmons v. Rios

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 23, 2019

App. 1977).2 In 1995 the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board (Board) recommended Petitioner for parole release, but the Governor of the State of Oklahoma rejected the Board’s parole recommendation. … See Block v.