Case law

Mukhammadjon Makhmudov v. Pamela Bondi, et al.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

But while Petitioner may qualify as an “applicant for admission,” that alone does not make Petitioner “an alien seeking admission.” See Escarcega v. Olson, No. CIV-25-1129-J, 2025 WL 3243438, at *2 (W.D. Okla. … That is, because an alien present in the United States without admittance would be unlikely to prove that they are ‘clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted,’ ICE would never need to rely on § 1226(c)(1)(E)

Rawal

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2026

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals is in agreement, ruling that “while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as ‘an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,’ § 1225(a)(1), … The Government Should Be Required To Establish Flight and/or Dangerousness By Clear and Convincing Evidence.

Huang

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2026

Under § 1225(b)(2)(A), “in the case of an alien who is an applicant for admission, if the examining immigration officer determines that an alien seeking admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted … And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its

Singh

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its … After all, “the facts clearly demonstrate that [the petitioner] was entitled to more process than he received pursuant to § 1226(a) and its implementing regulations.”) (first quoting Garcia Cortes v.

Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America v. Muse

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 26, 2020

that the Policy provision at issue does not preclude the possibility that a caregiver might be nominally labeled as an independent contractor but in actual fact supervised by a Home Health Care Agency and, therefore, qualify … (“When an insurer desires to limit its liability under a policy, it must employ language that clearly and distinctively reveals its stated purpose.”); Am. Econ. Ins. Co. v.

Smith v. Coyle Public Schools

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 2021

As to the initial suspension, the undisputed facts establish that Mr. Smith, as the principal of the school, had the authority to discipline P.M.S. for hitting another student. The facts also establish that Mr. … In Patrick, the Tenth Circuit denied qualified immunity where there was evidence that the hearing officer was given a prepared memorandum finding the employee should be terminated in advance, and the hearing officer felt

Gilbert v. Dollar General Corporation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 14, 2024

The Court generally notes that the issue of punitive damages will be addressed, if appropriate, under the framework established by 23 OKLA. STAT. § 9.1, and would proceed, if at all, in two phases. … Parties refrain from testifying about any statement or propounding any question related to comments or statements made by the Plaintiff to any healthcare provider because such statements would be hearsay and not qualify

United States v. Hardage

750 F. Supp. 1460 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1990

Davis’ opinion, he was qualified to render such a view. Mr. Davis is the hazardous waste director for the EPA’s Region VI. V at 1174-79. 28. … The NCP is the EPA regulation that establishes procedures for selection of response actions.

Tyler v. United States

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 6, 2025

Thus, assuming the foundational testimony establishes that Mrs. … Under Rule 701, a lay witness’s testimony “in the form of an opinion is limited to one that is: (a) rationally based on the witness’s perception; (b) helpful to clearly understanding the witness’s testimony or to determining

Glossip v. Chandler

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 14, 2022

But, oddly enough, one thing that is not quite clear from the three Supreme Court cases is whether this court’s reckoning of the degree of pain required to qualify as “cruel” within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment is … a person deeply se- dated by a 500 milligram dose of midazolam is still sure or very likely to experience an unconstitutionally high level of pain, Henness has not met his burden on this prong, and the district court clearly

Tawose

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 29, 2026

But the Court clearly anticipated further proceedings in the case, giving Plaintiff leave to amend his Complaint and declining to preclude him from amending his claims against the Winton Defendants. … The Winton Defendants have failed to meet their burden of establishing claim preclusion.

Garza v. Fusion Industries, LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2023

Thus, Plaintiff has established “good cause” under Rule 16(b)(4) to allow amendment out of time. See Scott v. … Kan. 2019) (“[T]he drafters of the Rule clearly contemplated that it would also apply to the addition of new plaintiffs. . . .

Singh

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 3, 2026

Under § 1225(b)(2)(A), “in the case of an alien who is an applicant for admission, if the examining immigration officer determines that an alien seeking admission is not clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted … And while a noncitizen arrested in the Midwest might qualify as “an alien present in the United States who had not been admitted,” § 1225(a)(1), the mandatory detention provision upon which Defendants rely, limits its

Johnson v. Kelly

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2024

According to claims data, F.M. had been OPC’s established patient since December 2014. Id. ¶ 129a.ii. … The allegations in the CII clearly state that Medicare, TRICARE, and FEHBP do not pay claims that are not medically necessary.

Thomas v. Oklahoma Land Holdings LLC

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 27, 2020

Further, evidence presented at the temporary injunction hearing established that Caye Publishing had nothing more than a potential business interest in Parker County. … Whether information qualifies as a trade secret is a question of fact. See Central Plastics Co. v. Goodson, 537 P.2d 330, 333–35 (Okla. 1975).

Hendricks v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2023

THE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION The ALJ followed the three-step sequential evaluation process established for minor children as set forth in 20 C.F.R. §416.924(a). … Gutierrez-Santiago was somehow not qualified to render an opinion because she had no treating relationship with D.C.H. and was not his pediatrician. But the fact that Dr.

Sanda v. Samsung Electronics America Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 2020

The Settlement Administrator also established a toll-free number. Id. … This Settlement Agreement builds on the structure established by the voluntary recall.

Fraker v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 2020

The Settlement Administrator also established a toll-free number. Id. … This Settlement Agreement builds on the structure established by the voluntary recall.

Anderson v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 2020

The Settlement Administrator also established a toll-free number. Id. … This Settlement Agreement builds on the structure established by the voluntary recall.

Lane v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 22, 2020

The Settlement Administrator also established a toll-free number. Id. … This Settlement Agreement builds on the structure established by the voluntary recall.