Case law

United States v. Hall

424 F. Supp. 508 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1975

Thereafter Hall had numerous contacts with Rogers and several members of the Board of Trustees of the System all aimed at getting the Taylor plan approved by the Board of the System. … The Board on December 23, 1974 did approve the Taylor plan subject to a letter of legality from the Attorney General and a letter of approval from the Investment Counsellor of the Board.

Voss v. Hinds

111 F. Supp. 679 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1953

In Jones v. … Sec. 311) Phillips v. Commissioner, 283 U.S. 589 [ 51 S.Ct. 608 , 75 L.Ed. 1289 ], there ' is no justification for confining such system within an assumed general purpose to keep interest out of the Board’s focus.

Kinney ex rel. Kinney v. Sullivan

746 F. Supp. 1067 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1990

. § 405 (g); Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); Brown v. Bowen, 801 F.2d 361, 362 (10th Cir.1986). … Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. at 1427 ; Fowler v. Bowen, 876 F.2d 1451, 1453 (10th Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, 801 F.2d at 362 .

Wilson v. Oklahoma City Council

347 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 21, 1972

See Valenti v. … In Reynolds v.

Town of Marshall ex rel. Versluis v. Carey

42 F. Supp. 630 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 1941

See State v. Moore, 78 Okl. 164 , 189 P. 511 , and Hartsog v. Tucker, 108 Okl. 143 , 234 P. 726 . … In Akard v.

Fontenot v. Hunter

378 F. Supp. 3d 1075 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2019

v. … The IACA was designed "to expand the powers of the Indian Arts and Crafts Board" ("Board"). H.R. Rep. No. 101-400(I) at 1 (Doc. No. 35-2, at 1).

Williams v. United States Postal Service

834 F. Supp. 350 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 28, 1993

Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District No. 1, 926 F.2d 959, 961 (10th Cir.1991) (citations omitted). In so stating, the Tenth Circuit cited, inter alia, Davis v. … See Montplaisir v.

Douglas v. Miller

864 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2012

Board of County Comm’rs, 582 F.3d 1155, 1166 (10th Cir. 2009) (quoting Shero v. City of Grove, 510 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir.2007)). … Brown v. Hartshome Public School District No. 1, 926 F.2d 959, 962 (10th Cir.1991).

Garner v. State of Okl.

430 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 8, 1975

This habeas proceeding is among the progeny of the decisions of the Court of Appeals in Lamb v. Brown, 456 F.2d 18 *693 (CA10 1972) and Radcliff v. Anderson, 509 F.2d 1093 (CA10 1975). … See also Kemplen v. State of Maryland, 428 F.2d 169 (CA4 1970). The reason and purpose of such an inquiry was set forth in Brown v.

Ainsworth v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

298 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 21, 1969

Cessa Aircraft Company v. Brown, 348 F.2d 689 (Tenth Cir. 1965). … Mattel, Inc. v. Louis Marx & Co., 353 F.2d 421 (Second Cir. 1965).

Ward v. Page

238 F. Supp. 431 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 25, 1965

In Waley v. … The United States Supreme Court, in Machibroda v.

Dillman v. Winchester

639 F. Supp. 2d 1257 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2009

Both claims are also asserted against the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County (“Board”). The Board has also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. … Vester v. Board of Review of Oklahoma Employment Security Commission, 697 P.2d 533 (Okla.1985). 7 .

Lindauer v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority

312 F. Supp. 1361 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 20, 1970

Miller v. Smith, 236 F.Supp. 927 (Pa. 1964). … See Kramer v. Union Free School District, Note 7, 395 U.S. 621 , 89 *1363 S.Ct. 1886 , 23 L.Ed.2d 583 (1969); Isaacs v.

Cantu Services Inc v. Worley

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 7, 2021

4 Cantu Services, Inc. v. … Williams v. Broaddus, 331 F. App’x 560, 562 (10th Cir. 2009); FDIC v. United Pacific Ins.

Tower Mortgage Corp. v. Reynolds

81 F.R.D. 560 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1978

See, e. g., Gaines v. Sun Ray Oil Co., 539 F.2d 1136 , 1139 n. 7 (Eighth Cir. 1976); Parr v. … Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Brown, 519 P.2d 491 (Okl.1974). Plaintiffs’ claim against Reynolds in this action arises from a loan application agreement executed by Reynolds.

Oklahoma State AFL-CIO v. Derryberry

422 F. Supp. 1085 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 22, 1976

On November 20, 1974, this action was stayed pending the outcome of the case of Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. then before the United States Supreme Court. … Section 736.1 is unconstitutional, void and of no effect for the reasons stated in the Virginia State Board of Pharmacy case. It is therefore Ordered, Adjudged, and Decreed that Title 59 O.S.

Willoughby v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.

89 F. Supp. 994 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1950

Thomson v. Catalina, 1928, 205 Cal. 402 , 271 P. 198 , 62 A.L.R. 235 ; Davis v. Hearst, 1911, 160 Cal. 143 , 116 P. 530 ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Roth, 1908, 130 Ky. 759 , 114 S.W. 264 ; Nelson v. … Alexander v. Jones, supra; Brown v. Higby, 1942, 191 Okl. 173 , 127 P.2d 195 ; Western Union Telegraph v. Garrett, 1916, 59 Okl. 50 , 158 P. 619, 620 ; Lilly v. St. Louis & *997 S. F. Ry.

Bley v. Independent School District No I-041 of Oklahoma County

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 9, 2023

Brown v. ScriptPro, LLC, 700 F.3d 1222, 1226 (10th Cir. 2012). … Brown v. ScriptPro, LLC, 700 F.3d 1222, 1229 (10th Cir. 2012). But an FMLA retaliation claim also differs from an interference claim in another important respect: “the timing of the adverse action.” Campbell v.

American Casualty Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

821 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 12, 1993

Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 864 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654, 655 , 82 S.Ct. 993, 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962) (per curiam). … Hudson’s wife, defendant Janet Hudson, became a member of the bank’s board of directors in early 1983.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Kansas Bankers Surety Co.

732 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1990

See Adams v. … obtained be the same as that which the Board is supervising at the time”).