Case law

Hofferber v. First Nat. Bank of Guymon, Oklahoma

437 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 4, 1977

Ogden and John Board of Ogden & Board, Attorneys at Law, and Norman C. Wilmeth have filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for lack of jurisdiction. … Long v. District of Columbia, 152 U.S.App.D.C. 187 , 469 F.2d 927 (1972); Young v. Board of Education, 416 F.Supp. 1139 (D.Colo.1976); Bennun v. Board of Governors, 413 F.Supp. 1274 (D.N.J.1976); Davis v.

S. Toepfer, Inc. v. Braniff Airways, Inc.

135 F. Supp. 671 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1955

The tariff filed by the defendant in the office of the Civil Aeronautics Board pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Aeronautics Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 401 et seq., became a part of the contract of transportation. … Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, 2 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 939 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1337 ; Mack v. Eastern Air Lines, D.C.Mass.1949, 87 F.Supp. 113 ; Shortley v. Northwestern Airlines, D.C.D.C.1952, 104 F.Supp. 152 ; Jones v.

Holbert v. Cimarron County Sheriff's Department

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 12, 2021

Brown v. … allegations against the county, the board of county commissioners is. Meade v. Grubbs, 841 F.2d 1512, 1527–28 (10th Cir. 1988).

Gambulous v. Harris

361 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 14, 1973

This Board has only 17 agents to enforce its regulations and the applicable laws in the State of Oklahoma. … It is further ordered that the record in action Civ-73-119-C, Soonersphere Club, Association, an unincorporated association, and Ruby Boyd v. Curtis P.

Oklahoma American Legion Corp. v. American Legion

24 F. Supp. 3d 1082 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 3, 2014

(depriving plaintiffs of a 5% voting block would likely cost them a seat on the board of directors and impair their ability to influence a merger decision). … See Brown ex rel. Brown v. Oklahoma Secondary Sch. Activities Ass’n, 125 P.3d 1219, 1228 (Okla.2005). The current record does not suggest, in any compelling way, unreasonable or arbitrary conduct by Defendant. 4 C.

Oklahoma Broadcasters Ass'n v. Crisp

636 F. Supp. 978 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 30, 1986

Schweiker v Wilson, 450 US 221, 230 , 67 LEd2d 186 , 101 SCt 1074 [1080] (1981); United States Railroad Retirement Board v Fritz, 449 US 166, 174-175 , 66 LEd2d 368 , 101 SCt 453 [459-460] (1980); Vance v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia, 427 US 307, 313 , 49 LEd2d 520 , 96 SCt 2562 [2567] (1976).

Rhoads v. Leonard

113 F. Supp. 411 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 1953

Home Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Blaisdell, 1933, 290 U.S. 398 , 54 S.Ct. 231 , 78 L.Ed. 413 ; Brown v. Perdon, 1936, 5 Cal.2d 226 , 54 P.2d 712 ; Baker v. Tulsa Building & Loan Ass’n, 1936, 179 Okl. 432 , 66 P.2d 45 . … In any of the cases mentioned in section sixteen hundred and eighty-nine * * See Brown v. Klein, 1928, 89 Cal.App. 153 , 264 P. 496 ; Thomas v. Hacker, 1919, 179 Cal. 731 , 178 P. 855 . . As mentioned in Davis v.

United States v. Salamy

253 F. Supp. 616 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1966

It is clearly stated in Campbell v. United States, 4 Cir., 221 F.2d 454 , and United States v. … Board.

United States v. Thompson

253 F. Supp. 535 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 12, 1966

Glover v. United States, 8 Cir., 286 F.2d 84 . This rule was relaxed in the case of Donato v. United States, 9 Cir., 302 F.2d 468 . … In Badger v.

United Artists Corporation v. Harris

363 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 23, 1973

See Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Central Liquor Co., 421 P.2d 244, 245 (Okl.). … Brown v. Chote, 411 U.S. 452 , 98 S.Ct. 1732 , 36 L.Ed.2d 420 (decided May 7, 1973).

Community Health Development Partners LLC v. Osborne

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 14, 2025

Brown v. City of Tulsa, 124 F.4th 1251, 1263 (10th Cir. 2025). III. … Polukoff v. St. Mark’s Hosp., 895 F.3d 730, 745 (10th Cir. 2018) (quoting Williams v.

Bond v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 2023

Apr. 18, 2019) (finding that the Board of County Commissioners could be separately liable for § 1983 claims brought against Board and jail trust); Chichakli v. Samuels, No. CIV-15-687-D, 2016 WL 2743542, at *4 (W.D. … Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997).

Couch v. Udall

265 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1967

In O’Dwyer v. C. I. … Brown-Pacific-Max-on, 340 U.S. 504 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Attocknie v. Udall, 261 F. Supp. 876 (W.D.Okl.1966).

First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Jones

61 F. Supp. 364 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 7, 1945

Pal-liser v. Home Telephone Co., 1911, 170 Ala. 341 , 54 So. 499, 500 . The power to set aside extends to time stipulations. Palliser v. Home Telephone Co., supra; Borgman v. Bultema, 1920, 212 Mich. 70 , 179 N.W. 347 . … Afterwards, this court in the case of Marsh Fork Coal Co. v.

Gibbany v. State of Okl., Dept. of Corrections

415 F. Supp. 1117 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 19, 1976

Pursuant to the authority of Reed v. … Hickman v. Arkansas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 361 F.Supp. 864 (E.D.Ark.1973).

United States v. Poe

398 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1975

The cases submitted by Plaintiff are United States v. Brown, 389 F.Supp. 959 (S.D.N.Y., 1975) and In re: Grand Jury Proceedings, United States v. DiGirlomo, 393 F.Supp. 997 (W.D.Mo., 1975). … In Wall v.

Person v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

428 F. Supp. 1148 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1976

Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F.2d 495 (10th Cir. 1970). … Johnson v. REA, supra, and Patterson v. American Tobacco Co., 535 F.2d 257 (4th Cir. 1976).

Hogan v. Orr

672 F. Supp. 1388 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1986

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed. 2d 402, 411 (1976); Johnson v. Orr, 747 F.2d 1352, 1356 (10th Cir.1984). … Hoffman v. Boeing, 596 F.2d 683 , 685 (5th Cir.1979). Furthermore, Plaintiff was only authorized to file a civil action challenging the agency’s rejection of the class complaint. See Wade v. Secretary of the Army, No.

Harrison v. Orr

672 F. Supp. 1387 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 10, 1986

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402, 411 (1976); Johnson v. Orr, 747 F.2d 1352, 1356 (10th Cir.1984). … Hoffman v. Boeing, 596 F.2d 683 , 685 (5th Cir.1979). Furthermore, Plaintiff was only authorized to file a civil action challenging the agency’s rejection of the class complaint. See Wade v. Secretary of the Army, No.

Stratton v. Sullivan

766 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 28, 1991

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. at 1427 ; Fowler v. Bowen, 876 F.2d 1451, 1453 (10th Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, 801 F.2d at 362 . … See, Brown v. Sullivan, 912 F.2d 1194, 1196 (10th Cir.1990).