Case law

Houston & North Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Local Union No. 886 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters

24 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1938

Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. United States Railroad Labor Board et al., 261 U.S. 72 , 43 S.Ct. 278 , 67 L.Ed. 536 . … In Virginian Railway Co. v.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Farris

738 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1989

Only when a new entity takes control of the bank, be it a receiver or a new board of directors, can suit against the wrongdoers be brought as a practical matter.” Hudson, 673 F.Supp. at 1042 ; see FDIC v. … Williams, 599 F.Supp. 1184 (D.Md.1984); see also Order of Jan. 12, 1988, FDIC v.

Wallace v. Choctaw Nicoma Park School District

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 7, 2021

Board of County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); see also Monell v. Dep't of Soc. … Additionally, Plaintiffs’ reliance on Johnson v. Dallas Ind.

Edwards v. State of Oklahoma

429 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 23, 1976

In Walker v. … In State v.

Fleak v. Allman

420 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1976

Hendrix v. State, 47 OBAJ 1819 (August 19, 1976), citing Johnson v. State Election Board, 370 P.2d 551 (Okla.1962). … Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134, 144 , 92 S.Ct. 849, 856 , 31 L.Ed.2d 92 (1972).

Board of Regents for the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical Colleges v. Johnson Controls Inc

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 2, 2024

Board’s Resp. at 3. … See, e.g., Murray v. Colo., 149 F.

National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Harris

354 F. Supp. 887 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 30, 1972

Swift & Co. v. Wickham, 382 U.S. 111 , 86 S.Ct. 258 , 15 L.Ed.2d 194 ; Chewie v. Lock, County Attorney, et al, 261 F.Supp. 830 , App. … Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co., 137 F.2d 274 , C.A.10 1943, affirmed 321 U.S. 383 , 64 S.Ct. 622 , 88 L.Ed. 814 .

In re Four Seasons Securities Laws Litigation Opinion No. 4

59 F.R.D. 667 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1973

Brown was made lead counsel in the Four Seasons cases. … On or about December 5, 1972, after counsel for Clark had referred to the settlement during a pretrial hearing before Judge Rubin in State of Ohio v. Crofters, Inc., et al., Brown read the M.

Meder v. City of Oklahoma City

672 F. Supp. 500 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 10, 1987

Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962). … Cleveland Board of Education v.

Mobile Home Express, Ltd. v. United States

354 F. Supp. 701 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 26, 1973

These statements constituted the evidentiary record before Review Board Number 2. … See Bell Lines, Inc. v. United States, 306 F.Supp. 209 (S.D.W.Va.), aff’d., 397 U.S. 818 , 90 S.Ct. 1517 , 25 L.Ed.2d 804 ; Caravelle Express, Inc. v. United States, 287 F.Supp. 585 (D. Neb.); Roadway Express, Inc. v.

Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. International Registration Plan, Inc.

264 F. Supp. 2d 990 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2003

Robart Estate v. … Oklahoma Tax Commission v. International Registration Plan, Inc., CIV-02-466-HE (W.D. Okla.

Powell v. Nunley

682 F. Supp. 2d 1260 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 14, 2010

Brown v. Creek County ex rel. Creek County Board of County Comm’rs., 164 P.3d 1073, 1075 (Okla.2007). … Brown v. Ford, 905 P.2d 223, 229 (Okla.1995).

Garfield Inv. Corp. v. City of Enid

122 F. Supp. 73 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 26, 1954

Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. … County Excise Board of Jefferson County, 1935, 175 Okl. 245 , 52 P.2d 51 ; Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Mullins, 1950, 202 Okl. 628 , 217 P.2d 835 ; Wilson v.

Beavers v. Alford

582 F. Supp. 1504 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 9, 1984

Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U.S. 54, 64-67 , 88 S.Ct. 1549, 1554-1556 , 20 L.Ed.2d 426 (1968); Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234, 237-238 , 88 S.Ct. 1556, 1559-1560 , 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968); Sinclair v. … Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 167 , 97 S.Ct. 2221, 2226 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977); Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157,169 , 82 S.Ct. 248, 254 , 7 L.Ed.2d 207 (1961).

Sahmaunt v. Horse

593 F. Supp. 162 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 13, 1984

However, the Plaintiff was advised by the tribal Election Board that he must resign to be eligible for the election. The Plaintiff complied and the Election Board placed his name on the ballot. … An appeal of the Election Board’s decision was taken to the Kiowa Hearing Board, which concluded that the Kiowa Constitution and Bylaws required that a candidate for an office other than the one currently held must resign

Oklahoma v. United States

193 F. Supp. 261 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 9, 1960

See Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United States, *263 314 U.S. 534 , 62 S.Ct. 366 , 86 L.Ed. 432 . … See United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc., supra; Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey City, supra; Board of Trade of Kansas City v. United States, supra.

Sac and Fox Nation v. Norton

585 F. Supp. 2d 1293 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 27, 2006

United States v. … Thereafter, the 29 protesters appealed the denial of their challenge to the Interior Board of Indian Appeals in Harris-Noble, et al. v. Acting Southern Plains Regional Director, IBIA 05-40-A.

In Re Unit Parts Co.

9 B.R. 386 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 23, 1981

The applicant, National Labor Relations Board, appearing through its counsel, Sara M. … As authority, the applicant cites: Nathanson v. NLRB, 344 U.S. 25 , 73 S.Ct. 80 , 97 L.Ed. 23 (1952); In Re Shippers Interstate Service, Inc., 618 F.2d 9 (7th Cir. 1980); and Seeburg v.

Altstatt

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 16, 2026

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Specifically, a plaintiff must demonstrate 1) an official policy or custom; 2) causation; and 3) deliberate indifference. See Lucas v. … Layton v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Okla. Cnty., 512 F. App’x 861, 871 (10th Cir. 2013) (unpublished); Barney v.

Armstrong v. Powell

230 F.R.D. 661 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 10, 2005

(Aug. 8, 1995, Board Tr., Pis.’ … The class claims, therefore, are by definition ‘across-the-board.’ ” Webb v. Merck & Co., Inc., 206 F.R.D. 399 , 404 n. 1.