Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,782 results
1.51s
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Boone
361 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1972
Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U.S. 132 , 11 S.Ct. 924 , 35 L.Ed. 662 ; Hoehn v. Crews (C.A. 10 Okla.) 144 F.2d 665 , affirmed; Garber v. Crews, 324 U.S. 200 , 65 S.Ct. 600 , 89 L.Ed. 870 . 4. … Neese v. Brown, Tenn., 405 S.W.2d 577 , 25 A.L. R.3rd 932 at 937. 11.
Cited 5 timesPublishedTaylor v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
407 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1976
Defendant relies upon the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Brown v. Brown, 410 P.2d 52 (1966), wherein the court, with reference to a release containing language similar to the above, stated: “ . . . … Accordingly, Brown is not controlling; the question thus is whether the release reflects the intent to release this alleged tortfeasor. The intent of the parties is the paramount consideration. All American Bus Lines v.
Cited 7 timesPublished42 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1941
This same line of reasoning was approved in Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 25 U.S. 419 , 6 L.Ed. 678 . … In National Labor Relations Board v.
Cited 17 timesPublished415 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1976
Snyder v. United States Board of Parole, 383 F.Supp. 1153 (D.Colo.1974). … Carson v. Executive Director, Department of Parole, 292 F.2d 468 (CA10 1961). This court cannot serve as a super parole board. Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, supra.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHawley v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 21, 2025
CIV-25-151-SLP ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ) OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL ) … P. 41(b); Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents at Arapahoe Cty.
Cited 0 timesUnknown53 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1944
In Anderson, Warden, v. … Citing Anderson v. Corall, supra, and Stockton v. Massey, supra. We see no difference in principle in the case at bar and Anderson v. Corall, supra.
Cited 11 timesPublished842 F. Supp. 480 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1993
Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 682 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 349 , 74 L.Ed.2d 388 (1982). … Smith is a board certified psychiatrist whose education and experience are greater than the government’s expert. Further, Dr.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMiller v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2025
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Rather, “[t]he plaintiff must also demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 405. For the third element, Miller must plausibly allege that the Board and OCCJA acted with deliberate indifference.
Cited 0 timesUnknown89 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1950
In Dunn v. U. … Oklahoma Constitution, Article V, Sec. 57. An ambiguous act should be construed in such a way as to make it constitutional. Brown v. State Election Board, 1946, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedLiles v. Department of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2025
Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983); see also Charlton v. Donley, 846 F. … For all these reasons, the Court finds the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious. V.
Cited 0 timesUnknown879 F. Supp. 1120 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1995
Carpet, Linoleum and Resilient Title Layers, Etc. v. Brown, 656 F.2d 564, 566 (10th Cir.1981). … Silveyra v. Moschorak, 989 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir.1993), citing, Brown, 656 F.2d at 566 ; Work v. U.S., 267 U.S. 175, 177 , 45 S.Ct. 252, 253 , 69 L.Ed. 561 (1925). See also, Barr v.
Cited 0 timesPublished18 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1955
Faced with that situation, the board of directors of the corporation, consisting of the taxpayer, Marjory Griffin Leake, James C. … Commissioner, 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 , certiorari denied Randolph v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 599 , 56 S.Ct. 116 , 80 L.Ed. 425 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Champion, 6 Cir., 78 F.2d 513 ; Brown v.
Cited 4 timesPublished172 B.R. 337 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1994
Barney U. and Virginia Martin Brown, co-trustees of the Barney U. Brown Trust, and Central Bank served as voting trustees, with six and sixteen votes respectively. Appellant held six votes under the PLTA. … Mosser v. Darrow, 341 U.S. 267 , 71 S.Ct. 680 , 95 L.Ed. 927 (1951); Sherr v. Winkler, 552 F.2d 1367 (10th Cir.1977); Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Co., 557 F.2d 179 (9th Cir.1977).
Cited 9 timesPublished24 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1938
Co. v. … In Straughn v. Berry, 179 Okl. 364 , 65 P.2d 1203 , the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held, quoting from Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States Leasing Corp. v. Brownwood Distilling, Co. (In re Brownwood Distilling Co.)
32 B.R. 54 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1983
Amoco Production Co. v. Lindley, 609 P.2d 733 (Okl.1980); Continental Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n. v. Fetter, 564 P.2d 1013 (Okl.1977). … The case of Brown v. Financial Service Corporation, International, 489 F.2d 144 (5th Cir.1974) is supportive of our holding. Brown dealt with a corporation which provided its executive officers a stock purchase plan.
Cited 2 timesPublished110 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1953
It is valid until assailed in a direct proceeding instituted for that purpose.’ # iji Jf In Brown v. … Benedict v. Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, 1932, 161 Okl. 50 , 17 P.2d 454, 455 . . 1933, 164 Okl. 91 , 22 P.2d 1008, 1010 . In State ex rel. Short, Atty. Gen. v.
Reversed by Simler v. Wilson, 210 F.2d 99 (1954)Cited 3 timesPublishedMurphy v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 2, 2024
See Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1162 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). Erwin’s R. & R. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the specific issues raised in the Objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSeabourn v. Independent School District No. I-300
775 F. Supp. 2d 1306 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2010
Tonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents, 159 F.3d 504, 528 (10th Cir.1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … Hoerman v. Western Heights Board of Education, 913 P.2d 684, 690 (Okla.Civ. App.1996).
Cited 3 timesPublishedO'DELL v. Lamb-Grays Harbor Co.
911 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1995
Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). … Plaintiffs also rely on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc., 896 F.2d 474 (10th Cir.1990).
Cited 6 timesPublished384 F. Supp. 1148 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1974
Brown v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10 1968); Omo v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 757 (C.A. 10 1968). … Sandoval v. Rodriguez, 461 F.2d 1097 (C.A. 10 1972).
Cited 3 timesPublished
Ask Donna