Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokwd

1,782 results

1.51s

  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Boone

    361 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1972

    Briggs v. Spaulding, 141 U.S. 132 , 11 S.Ct. 924 , 35 L.Ed. 662 ; Hoehn v. Crews (C.A. 10 Okla.) 144 F.2d 665 , affirmed; Garber v. Crews, 324 U.S. 200 , 65 S.Ct. 600 , 89 L.Ed. 870 . 4. … Neese v. Brown, Tenn., 405 S.W.2d 577 , 25 A.L. R.3rd 932 at 937. 11.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. Beech Aircraft Corp.

    407 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 30, 1976

    Defendant relies upon the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Brown v. Brown, 410 P.2d 52 (1966), wherein the court, with reference to a release containing language similar to the above, stated: “ . . . … Accordingly, Brown is not controlling; the question thus is whether the release reflects the intent to release this alleged tortfeasor. The intent of the parties is the paramount consideration. All American Bus Lines v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Veazey Drug Co. v. Fleming

    42 F. Supp. 689 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1941

    This same line of reasoning was approved in Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 25 U.S. 419 , 6 L.Ed. 678 . … In National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Barr v. United States

    415 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 8, 1976

    Snyder v. United States Board of Parole, 383 F.Supp. 1153 (D.Colo.1974). … Carson v. Executive Director, Department of Parole, 292 F.2d 468 (CA10 1961). This court cannot serve as a super parole board. Wiley v. United States Board of Parole, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hawley v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 21, 2025

    CIV-25-151-SLP ) BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE ) OKLAHOMA COUNTY CRIMINAL ) … P. 41(b); Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents at Arapahoe Cty.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Welch v. Hillis

    53 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1944

    In Anderson, Warden, v. … Citing Anderson v. Corall, supra, and Stockton v. Massey, supra. We see no difference in principle in the case at bar and Anderson v. Corall, supra.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • United States v. Veatch

    842 F. Supp. 480 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 16, 1993

    Brown v. Warden, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 682 F.2d 348 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 991 , 103 S.Ct. 349 , 74 L.Ed.2d 388 (1982). … Smith is a board certified psychiatrist whose education and experience are greater than the government’s expert. Further, Dr.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 12, 2025

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Rather, “[t]he plaintiff must also demonstrate that, through its deliberate conduct, the municipality was the ‘moving force’ behind the injury alleged.” Id. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 405. For the third element, Miller must plausibly allege that the Board and OCCJA acted with deliberate indifference.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Williams

    89 F. Supp. 929 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 23, 1950

    In Dunn v. U. … Oklahoma Constitution, Article V, Sec. 57. An ambiguous act should be construed in such a way as to make it constitutional. Brown v. State Election Board, 1946, 197 Okl. 169 , 170 P.2d 200 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Liles v. Department of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2025

    Chappell v. Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 303 (1983); see also Charlton v. Donley, 846 F. … For all these reasons, the Court finds the Board’s decision was not arbitrary and capricious. V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Willis-Gomez v. Meissner

    879 F. Supp. 1120 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 22, 1995

    Carpet, Linoleum and Resilient Title Layers, Etc. v. Brown, 656 F.2d 564, 566 (10th Cir.1981). … Silveyra v. Moschorak, 989 F.2d 1012, 1014 (9th Cir.1993), citing, Brown, 656 F.2d at 566 ; Work v. U.S., 267 U.S. 175, 177 , 45 S.Ct. 252, 253 , 69 L.Ed. 561 (1925). See also, Barr v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Leake v. Jones

    18 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1955

    Faced with that situation, the board of directors of the corporation, consisting of the taxpayer, Marjory Griffin Leake, James C. … Commissioner, 8 Cir., 76 F.2d 472 , certiorari denied Randolph v. Helvering, 296 U.S. 599 , 56 S.Ct. 116 , 80 L.Ed. 425 ; Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Champion, 6 Cir., 78 F.2d 513 ; Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Plotner v. AT & T

    172 B.R. 337 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1994

    Barney U. and Virginia Martin Brown, co-trustees of the Barney U. Brown Trust, and Central Bank served as voting trustees, with six and sixteen votes respectively. Appellant held six votes under the PLTA. … Mosser v. Darrow, 341 U.S. 267 , 71 S.Ct. 680 , 95 L.Ed. 927 (1951); Sherr v. Winkler, 552 F.2d 1367 (10th Cir.1977); Matter of Combined Metals Reduction Co., 557 F.2d 179 (9th Cir.1977).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Casady v. First State Bank

    24 F. Supp. 687 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 29, 1938

    Co. v. … In Straughn v. Berry, 179 Okl. 364 , 65 P.2d 1203 , the Supreme Court of Oklahoma held, quoting from Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Leasing Corp. v. Brownwood Distilling, Co. (In re Brownwood Distilling Co.)

    32 B.R. 54 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 8, 1983

    Amoco Production Co. v. Lindley, 609 P.2d 733 (Okl.1980); Continental Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n. v. Fetter, 564 P.2d 1013 (Okl.1977). … The case of Brown v. Financial Service Corporation, International, 489 F.2d 144 (5th Cir.1974) is supportive of our holding. Brown dealt with a corporation which provided its executive officers a stock purchase plan.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Simler v. Wilson

    110 F. Supp. 761 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 5, 1953

    It is valid until assailed in a direct proceeding instituted for that purpose.’ # iji Jf In Brown v. … Benedict v. Board of Com’rs of Lincoln County, 1932, 161 Okl. 50 , 17 P.2d 454, 455 . . 1933, 164 Okl. 91 , 22 P.2d 1008, 1010 . In State ex rel. Short, Atty. Gen. v.

    Reversed by Simler v. Wilson, 210 F.2d 99 (1954)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 2, 2024

    See Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1162 n.9 (10th Cir. 2016). Erwin’s R. & R. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the specific issues raised in the Objection. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Seabourn v. Independent School District No. I-300

    775 F. Supp. 2d 1306 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 21, 2010

    Tonkovich v. Kansas Board of Regents, 159 F.3d 504, 528 (10th Cir.1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … Hoerman v. Western Heights Board of Education, 913 P.2d 684, 690 (Okla.Civ. App.1996).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • O'DELL v. Lamb-Grays Harbor Co.

    911 F. Supp. 490 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 14, 1995

    Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 863 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982). … Plaintiffs also rely on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Riley v. Brown & Root, Inc., 896 F.2d 474 (10th Cir.1990).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Moles v. State of Oklahoma

    384 F. Supp. 1148 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 24, 1974

    Brown v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 755 (C.A. 10 1968); Omo v. Crouse, 395 F.2d 757 (C.A. 10 1968). … Sandoval v. Rodriguez, 461 F.2d 1097 (C.A. 10 1972).

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.