Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokwd

1,782 results

1.20s

  • Howard v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections

    247 F. Supp. 3d 1210 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 20, 2017

    See Brockman v. … Id. at 1558 (citing Eddy v. Brown, 1986 OK 3, ¶ 7 , 715 P.2d 74, 76 ) (internal quotations and paraphrasing omitted).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Calel

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026

    Soberanes v. Comfort, 388 F.3d 1305, 1310 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687-88 (2001)). IV. Under Santillan Quiroz v. … An immigration judge’s decision to detain may be further appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Id. § 236.1(d)(3).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hatch v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2020

    Co., 221 P.3d 717, 724 (2009) (essential element of bad faith claim for nonpayment of first-party coverage is “the claimant was entitled to coverage under the insurance policy”); see also Brown v. … Co. v. Quine, 264 P.3d 1245, 1249 (Okla. 2011); accord Ball, 221 P.3d at 725; Brown, 157 P.3d at 126-27; Skinner v. John Deere Ins. Co., 998 P.2d 1219, 1223 (Okla. 2000); see Shotts v. GEICO Ins.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Shields v. Smith

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 22, 2019

    .”); Henderson v. … Although Petitioner is correct that the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board (“PPB”) treats a life sentence as a 45-year sentence to calculate when a prisoner is eligible for parole, see Anderson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dong

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 15, 2026

    Preiser v. … Petitioner reserved her right to appeal that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), but she did not do so.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bollenbach v. United States

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2020

    at 679; see Robbins v. … Lyons v. Brown, 158 F.3d 605, 609 (1st Cir. 1998). Shirk v. U.S. ex rel.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Powell v. Oklahoma County of

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 23, 2019

    STAT. tit. 19, § 4 (a suit against a county must be brought by naming the board of county commissioners of that county); Martinez v. … Nielander v. Board of County Comm’rs, 582 F.3d 1155, 1170 (10th Cir. 2009) (quoting Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 823-824 (1985)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Escobar

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026

    Accardi v. … Petitioner reserved his 6 right to appeal that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • BOWDISH v. Federal Express Corp.

    699 F. Supp. 2d 1306 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2010

    During the relevant time period, Plaintiff was responsible for preparing RTD’s schedules on a monthly basis and posting them on bulletin boards at OKC-R. … In this case, Plaintiff relies only on the "background circumstances” method of proof, even though he cites a "direct evidence” case, McGarry v. Board of County Comm’rs, 175 F.3d 1193, 1199 (10th Cir.1999). 11 .

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Oklahoma Nursing Home Ass'n v. Demps

    816 F. Supp. 688 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1992

    V. … See, e.g., Turner v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Holley

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 4, 2026

    Co. v. … City of Las Cruces, 289 F.3d 1170, 1187 (10th Cir. 2002). 12 A & D Brown Enterprises, 2022 WL 178594, at *4 (internal citations omitted). the state lawsuit.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Eastwood v. National Bank of Commerce, Altus, Okl.

    673 F. Supp. 1068 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 25, 1987

    Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Bank through its chairman of the board of directors made misrepresentations to the effect that “no further action” was required by Eastwood Rentals in connection with the loans until a meeting … Defendants do not raise the issue of Plaintiff Babe Eastwood's failure to allege that a demand was made upon Eastwood Rentals' board of directors to sue Defendants herein, which demand was refused, or that such a demand would

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Arroyo

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2026

    An immigration judge’s decision to detain may be further appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Id. § 236.1(d)(3). Id. at 1239. … See Moore v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Custodian of Records

    743 F. Supp. 783 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 15, 1990

    E.g., Grosso v. … XXX-XX-XXXX 1953 Brame, Linda XXX-XX-XXXX 1951 Bridgewater, Helen V. XXX-XX-XXXX 1961 Browning, Ruthie XXX-XX-XXXX 1961 Bryant, Ida M. XXX-XX-XXXX 1957 Buford, Vernice L. XXX-XX-XXXX 1962 *791 Buley, Linda S.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Leisa Shannon v. Sunrooms and More Design Center, Inc.

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 20, 2026

    v. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 (2006) (quoting Robinson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lewis

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2026

    v. … In Loyd v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Godsey v. Mitchell

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 22, 2021

    Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1163 (10th Cir. 2011) (quotations omitted) (emphasis in original). … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164. III.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vanlandingham

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2026

    Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 (1997). Specifically, a plaintiff must demonstrate 1) an official policy or custom; 2) causation; and 3) deliberate indifference. See Lucas v. … Waller, 932 F.3d at 1284 (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 410-12).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius

    870 F. Supp. 2d 1278 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Nov 19, 2012

    O’Brien v. … Lee, 455 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 1051 , 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) and Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). Plaintiffs’ reply, p. 4.

    Reversed by Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius, 723 F.3d 1114 (2013)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Frederick v. Hamilton

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 30, 2025

    Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1161 n.5 (10th Cir. 2011); see also Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 27, 30 (1991). … See, e.g., Brown v. Buhman, 822 F.3d 1151, 1165, 1179 (10th Cir. 2016) (noting that “[m]ootness deprives federal courts of jurisdiction” and therefore dismissal based on mootness is without prejudice).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.