Case law

Dawson v. City of Bartlesville, Okl.

901 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 20, 1995

Columbia Pictures Industries, 345 F.Supp. 93, 98 (S.D.N.Y.1972)); Brown & Williamson v. Daniel International, 563 F.2d 671 , 673 (5th Cir.1977). … See Metzinger Aff.; Brown Aff.

Apartments Bldg. Co. v. Smiley

26 F.2d 469 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 24, 1928

, and Greene v. … United States v. Board of Commissioners of Osage County, 1 F.(2d) 701 (8 C. C. A.); First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, supra.

United States v. Ward

235 F. Supp. 2d 1183 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2002

Brown distinguished and clarified United States v. King, 979 F.2d 801 (10th Cir.1992). … By contrast, in Brown , an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy was an essential element. Brown, 200 F.3d at 706 .

Primeaux v. Independent School District No. 5

954 F. Supp. 2d 1292 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 29, 2012

Ridge at Red Hawk, LLC v. Schneider, 493 F.3d 1174, 1177 (10th Cir.2007) (quoting Bell *1294 Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)). … Gerber v.

Romero v. City of Miami

8 F. Supp. 3d 1321 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 20, 2014

Barney v. Pulsipher, 143 F.3d 1299, 1307 (10th Cir.1998) (quoting Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … Stat. tit. 40, § 552 (“ ‘Public employer’ means the State of Oklahoma or any political subdivision thereof, including any department, agency, board, commission, institution, authority, public trust, municipality, county,

Atlas Life Ins. v. W. I. Southern, Inc.

23 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 20, 1938

Co. v. Stewart, 300 U.S. 203 , 57 S.Ct. 377 , 81 L.Ed. 605 , 111 A.L.R. 1268 ; Enelow v. New York Life Ins. Co., 293 U.S. 379 , 55 S.Ct. 310 , 79 L.Ed. 440 ; Brown v. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. … In the case of Byrne v.

Goodman v. Platt

444 F. Supp. 140 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 24, 1978

See Logan v. Richard E. Carmack & Assoc., 368 F.Supp. 121 (E.D. Tenn.1973); Brown v. Ballas, 331 F.Supp. 1033 (N.D.Tex.1971). … See Tatum v. Myrick, 425 F.Supp. 809 (M.D.Fla.1977); Sumlin v. Brown, 420 F.Supp. 78 (N.D.Fla.1976); Brown v. Blake & Bane, Inc., 402 F.Supp. 621 (E.D.Va.1975); Young v. AAA Realty Co., 350 F.Supp. 1382 (M.D.N.C.1972).

Davis v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

380 F. Supp. 3d 1163 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2019

Brown v. Gray , 227 F.3d 1278 , 1288-89 (10th Cir. 2000). … Id. at 64 , 131 S.Ct. 1350 (quoting Board of County Com'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v.

Arthur Andersen LLP v. Standard & Poor's Credit

260 F. Supp. 2d 1123 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 23, 2003

Zink Co. v. Zink, 241 F.3d 1256, 1259 (10th Cir.2001). … See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 , 106 S.Ct. 466 , 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985); Haney v. Addison, 175 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 1999); and Talley v. Hesse, 91 F.3d 1411 (10th Cir.1996). February 18, 2003. 1 .

Bolin v. Oklahoma Conference of the United Methodist Church

397 F. Supp. 2d 1293 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 21, 2005

See Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74 (Okla.1986) (supervisor and foreman ridiculing plaintiff in the workplace not actionable); Mirzaie v. … See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 833 P.2d 1218, 1229 (Okla.1992).

Hayes v. Owen

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2023

Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199). … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1164 (quoting Dodds, 614 F.3d at 1199).

Cathey v. Sheriff Vic Regalado

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 18, 2020

See Brown v. Glanz, 2016 WL 3632713, at *6 (N.D. Okla. … Brown, 662 F.3d at 1167 (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424, U.S. 319, 332 (1976)).

Tesh v. United States Postal Service

215 F. Supp. 2d 1220 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 26, 2002

Plaintiffs claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to the extent it is asserted against the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) and the United States Postal Service (“USPS”); and 4. … See Swaim v. Moltan Co., 73 F.3d 711, 718 (7th Cir.1996); Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. Blum, 649 F.2d 342, 345 (5th Cir.1981); Young v.

Mike v. PROFESSIONAL CLINICAL LABORATORY, INC.

781 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2011

V. … (citing Atherton v.

Ciempa v. Jones

745 F. Supp. 2d 1171 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 23, 2010

Ciempa brings his RLUIPA claim regarding chapel time against Jones, Morton, and Brown. … Ciempa’s chapel time claim may, however, proceed against Jones and Brown. Brown made the decision to ban the NGE from the chapel.

Leisure Village Operating, LLC. v. Professional Clinical Laboratory, Inc.

781 F. Supp. 2d 1205 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2011

See Bearden v. … Co. v. AA.R.

Eck v. Willis (In Re Willis)

197 B.R. 912 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1996

The decision of the Bankruptcy Court in Brown was reversed by the district court, in a well-reasoned decision supportive of the “majority view,” McCullough v. Brown, 162 B.R. 506 (N.D.Ill.1993). … See also Groves v.

Ross v. University of Tulsa

225 F. Supp. 3d 1254 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 21, 2016

TU called four witnesses, including Gerald Bender (“Bender”), attorney for the City of Tulsa; Bryan; David Lackey (“Lackey”), lead counsel for TU; and June Brown (“Brown”), Secretary to the TU Board of Trustees. … Kaufman v. Am. Family Mut. Ins.

In Re Williams Companies ERISA Litigation

271 F. Supp. 2d 1328 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 14, 2003

See Brass v. Am. … Finally, under the Plan documents, the Board does not have the power to control investment options or to communicate Plan information. Applying the reasoning of Crowley v.

Chatman v. Barnes

357 F. Supp. 9 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 21, 1973

Virginia Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 670 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 ; to travel, Shapiro v. … See Lamb v. Brown, 456 F.2d 18, 20 (10th Cir.).