Case law

Young v. Apfel

39 F. Supp. 2d 1327 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 22, 1999

The Commissioner’s decision will be reversed when she uses the wrong legal standard or fails to clearly demonstrate reliance on the correct legal standards. Glass, 43 F.3d at 1395 . III. … Second, assuming all the allegations of pain as true, a claimant must establish a nexus between the impairment and the alleged pain.

T.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Laymon

723 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 21, 1989

that established firm, fixed price. … Similarly, the use of a Rosen geometric pig during the relevant period was not clearly established by the evidence.

Hayes v. Chaparral Energy, LLC

180 F. Supp. 3d 902 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 29, 2016

Statutory Framework “In 1872, Congress established a reservation for the Osage Nation in present day Oklahoma.” Osage Nation v. … “The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) is tasked with interpreting NEPA and establishing regulations governing agencies’ responsibilities under the statute.” Sierra Club, Inc. v.

Ellis v. Grimes

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 18, 2022

immunity. … Bray and Shoemaker both argued they are entitled to summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. Bray MSJ at 21–24; Shoemaker MSJ at 22–25.

Pikas v. Williams Companies, Inc.

903 F. Supp. 2d 1219 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 19, 2012

At the administrative level, Pikas did not clearly raise the argument that the Plan itself required the COLA be provided to lump sum beneficiaries. … Remedies need be established in a separate proceeding, as discussed above.

Barnett v. Bridges

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 28, 2025

. § 1997e(a); (2) Barnett fails to state any claims on which relief may be granted; (3) Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, to the extent Barnett asserts any individual capacity claims; and (4) Defendants are … immune from a suit for monetary damages, to the extent Barnett asserts any official capacity claims.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sofidel America Corp.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 10, 2025

the litigation or the defenses are clearly insufficient as a matter of law.” … Mach Mining established narrow limits on judicial review of EEOC’s conciliation efforts. 575 U.S. at 495.

Ashton v. Smith

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 9, 2022

Clearly established federal law Prosecutorial misconduct can violate the Constitution in two ways. … Thus, the OCCA’s decision, as to Ashton’s general allegations of misconduct, is not contrary to clearly established federal law.

Audacity Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2022

However, the letter clearly identifies the Board as the named insured. Id. … The evidence clearly establishes that the Board 7 requested CMIC to remove the Midtown Church property from the policy on January 20, 2020, and CMIC refunded

Hayes v. Browner

117 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2000

Rejection of the plaintiffs’ nondiscretion-ary duty and unreasonable delay claims does not mean that EPA’s approvals are immune from judicial scrutiny. … Clearly, at least a portion of the court's decision is pursuant to the APA.

Ibarra v. Lee

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2025

Ibarra are not clearly relevant but are also not clearly irrelevant. Dkt. 66-5. … Defend- ants argue that “the clearly established law in the Tenth Circuit holds that the Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to use the least or a less force- ful alternative” in an altercation. Mata v.

Dodson v. Reed

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 8, 2021

The proponent of the testimony bears the burden of establishing its admissibility. United States v. Nacchio, 555 F.3d 1234, 1241 (10th Cir. 2009) (en banc); Fed. R. Evid. 104(a). … The undisputed injuries sustained by Dodson clearly support the factual belief that the JPX was deployed within the minimum distance of five (5) feet.

Sutton v. Kiefer Public Schools

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2022

Plaintiff’s failure to establish the boy’s conduct as gender-oriented or motivated is sufficient to dismiss Plaintiff’s Title IX claim because she has failed to establish that the conduct complained of was “ … for purposes of immunity under Okla.

Stratton v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 10, 2020

On February 22nd, Sutherland offered Plaintiff Ryan Stratton a job as the Senior Accountant working in the group established to handle Motiva’s fixed- asset accounting. … Although Stratton clearly had some contact with the agency around that time, the law requires more than merely opening a case file.

Hunt v. Democratic Party of Oklahoma

439 F. Supp. 788 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1977

But there, unlike here, the Election Law of the state prescribed the manner in which state and county party committees are to be established and further provided that the county committee should consist of two members elected … It follows that the case is clearly distinguishable from the case at hand.” The Todd v.

Mengert v. United States

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 2023

. # 11) arguing that it had not waived sovereign immunity from plaintiff’s claims and the Court lacked jurisdiction over this case. … For the purpose of plaintiff’s proposed negligence claim, it does not matter whether the TSA’s screener’s failure to intervene was intentional or merely careless, and plaintiff was clearly aware of the TSA screener’s failure

The QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA v. Blue Tee Corp.

653 F. Supp. 2d 1166 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 2, 2009

However, this Court has previously held that federal regulation of mining on Tribal land does not immunize the mining defendants from liability under Oklahoma law, because these regulations did not expressly authorize the … Oklahoma law clearly establishes that “no lapse of time can legalize a public nuisance,” and this true regardless of whether a nuisance is temporary or permanent. Revard v. Hunt, 29 Okla. 835 , 119 P. 589, 592 (1911).

Morris

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 23, 2026

Finally, the policy in Hensley covered personal property, while the Policy in this case clearly excludes “[p]ersonal property of any kind.” (Docket No. 22-1 at 6). … Here, Plaintiff has not alleged facts or circumstances establishing a fiduciary relationship with PHH.

Murphy v. City of Tulsa

295 F. Supp. 3d 1221 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 13, 2018

Denno hearing and, therefore, Murphy cannot establish a Fifth Amendment violation. The court is not persuaded. … Further, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently qualified Owens , stating that "[the Owens ] standard must be read in conjunction with other rulings holding that '[a] vacated judgment

Double Eagle Alloys, Inc. v. Hooper

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 25, 2024

Double Eagle failed to identify its alleged trade secrets with sufficient particularity and clarity to proceed to trial.1 A plaintiff cannot simply point to 1 A party’s burden to clearly identify its trade secrets at the … Absent such evidence, Double Eagle can- not establish that its pricing and cost information was a trade secret. Austral- ian Gold, Inc. v.