Case law

Phillips v. Austin Police Department

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 10, 2020

See Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1231 (10th Cir. 2013) (noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee). … , RN, President of the Oklahoma Board of Nursing, (7) the U.S.

In re CFS-Related Securities Fraud Litigation

213 F.R.D. 435 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 18, 2003

See First Nat'l Bank of Nocona v. … See, e.g., Oliner v. McBride’s Indus., Inc., 106 F.R.D. 14, 20-21 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Embassy Electronics, Ltd. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co., 108 F.R.D. 418, 420 (S.D.N.Y.1985); State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of Am. v.

Davis

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2026

Montoya v. Chao, 296 F.3d 952, 955 (10th Cir. 2002). 2 Brown has also moved to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 15.) … As the Court determines Brown has been fraudulently joined, it will dismiss the claims against him without prejudice and will not address his motion. See Anderson v. Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB, 528 F.

Parker v. TOWN OF CHELSEA

620 F. Supp. 2d 1266 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 20, 2008

Similarly, in Jones v. … Id.; see Snyder v.

Zachary v. Rescare Oklahoma, Inc.

471 F. Supp. 2d 1183 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 2006

See Brown v. ResCare of Okla., Case No. 00-CV-893-K(E) (N.D.Okla.2000). ResCare Oklahoma was represented by the same counsel as in this litigation. On May 8, 2002, the Brown case settled. … There are no admissible facts in the record indicating that the Brown settlement somehow rendered Defendants’ alleged violations in this case reckless. This case is therefore distinguishable from Reich v.

Kelley v. Michaels

830 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1993

Under the FAA arbitration boards may award punitive damages. See Raytheon Co. v. Automated Business Systems, Inc., 882 F.2d 6 (1st Cir.1989); Bonar v. … In Pyle v.

Brady v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

696 F. Supp. 2d 1263 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2010

Board of County Commissioners of Harmon County v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, 194 Okla. 359 , 151 P.2d 797 (1944). … See, Brown v. Webster, 156 U.S. 328, 329 , 15 S.Ct. 377 , 39 L.Ed. 440 (1895). 9 .

American Bank of Tulsa v. Watson

391 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 19, 1973

In Whitney National Bank v. … Bank of Commerce of Laredo v. City National Bank of Laredo et al., supra; Bank of North America v. State Banking Board, 468 S.W.2d 529 , (Tex. 1971).

Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 3, 2019

The search warrant was obtained based on an affidavit sworn by Defendant Greg Brown (“Brown”), a detective with the TCSO. … tit. 19, § 4, suits against a county in Oklahoma must be brought against the board of county commissioners.

Aviation Materials, Inc. v. Pinney

65 F.R.D. 357 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1975

General Motors Corp. v. Kolodin, 16 F.R.D. 20 (E.D.N.Y.1954). … Brown Paper Mill Co. v. Agar Mfg. Corporation, 1 F.R.D. 579 (S.D.N.Y.1941).

Hufft

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 13, 2026

Massengale v. Oklahoma Board of Examiners in Optometry, 30 F.3d 1325, 1330 (10th Cir. 1994); Bud Brooks Trucking, Inc. v. Bill Hodges Trucking Co. Inc., 909 F.2d 1437, 1440 (10th Cir. 1990). … Nutter v. Wefald, 885 F.Supp. 1445, 1450 (D. Kan. Mar. 16, 1995) (citing Brown v. McCormick, 608 F.2d 410, 413 (10th Cir. 1979)).

Slinkard v. Independent School District No. 1 of Tulsa County

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2025

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 470-71 (1980) (quotation marks and citation omitted). … Lovern v. Edwards, 190 F.3d 648, 656 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 470 (1980)).

Terwilliger v. Home of Hope, Inc.

21 F. Supp. 2d 1294 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 1998

Anderson v. … Co. v.

Samson Resources Co v. International Business Partners, Inc.

906 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1995

Lockhart v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, 65 Fair Emp.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 5, 5-6, 1994 WL 34870 (D.Kan.1994). As the Supreme Court stated in Southland Corp. v. … Threlkeld & Co. v. Metallgesellschaft Ltd. (London), 923 F.2d 245, 248 (2d Cir.)

Balch v. Investors' Royalty Co.

7 F. Supp. 420 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 5, 1934

Under the principles announced by such cases as Wardell v. Union P. R. Co., 103 U. S. 655 , 26 L. Ed. 509 ; Johnson v. Umsted (C. C. A.) 64 F.(2d) 316 ; Davis v. Pearce (C. C. A.) 30 F.(2d) 85 ; Bently v. … Since the hearing has been had, and pursuant to the suggestion of the court as to a reorganization of the board of directors of the corporation, it appears that defendant MeAllaster has resigned as a member of the board.

D.G. ex rel. Strickland v. Yarbrough

278 F.R.D. 635 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 15, 2011

In General Telephone Co. of the Southwest v. … In Vuyanich v.

Springer v. Balough

96 F. Supp. 2d 1250 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 21, 2000

Storer v. Brown, 415 U.S. 724, 730 , 94 S.Ct. 1274 , 39 L.Ed.2d 714 (1974). … Brown, III, Julie Flynn, Gene Raynor/Linda Lamone, Meryl Atterberry, Joe Kerwin, Thomas R.

World Pub. Co. v. United States

104 F. Supp. 784 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1952

At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on December 12, 1939, Mr. … The judgment in the case of World Publishing Company v.

Wirtz v. Regalado

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 10, 2020

Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1163 n.8 (10th Cir. 2011). … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Rather, a county “can be liable under § 1983 only where its policies are the ‘moving force [behind] the constitutional violation.’” City of Canton v.

Wilhelm v. Consolidated Oil Corp.

11 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 28, 1935

Each subsidiary has its own board of directors, officers, and employees, and its business affairs are conducted by them as an organization separate from any of its allied corporations; each acquires and holds properties in … According to Brown v. Pond (D. C.) 5 F. 31 , and Bull v. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. Co. (D. C.) 6 F.(2d) 329 , and other authorities submitted, this contention is correct.