Case law

Wallace v. State

68 O.B.A.J. 1175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1997

Oklahoma v. … Quoting from Grasso v.

STATE v. STRAWN

2018 OK CR 2 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2018

State v. … We note that Trooper Koch moves quickly in writing the warning and running Strawn's information through the on-board computer.

Easley v. State

78 Okla. Crim. 1 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 3, 1943

State v. Brown, 12 Minn. 538 ( Gil. 448 ); State v. Hoyt, 13 Minn. 132 ( Gil. 125 ); People v. Clark, 11 N.Y. Leg.Obs. 4, 13. In Clifford v. … "In Radej v.

Darks v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 658 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1998

See Gregg v. … v.

SHEPARD v. STATE

2023 OK CR 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2023

Brown v. State , , ¶ 11, , 580; Glossip v. State , , ¶ 96, , 159. We find no error, plain or otherwise, from the challenged argument. … Brown , , ¶ 11, 177 P.3d at 580; Glossip , , ¶ 96, 157 P.3d at 159. There was no plain error as the trial court's admonition cured any possible error. See Vanscoy v. State , , ¶ 20, , 830.

MARTINEZ v. STATE

371 P.3d 1100 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 8, 2016

Browning v. State, 2006 OK *1113 CR 8, ¶ 32, 134 P.3d 816, 837 . … Bland v.

Thompson v. State

169 P.3d 1198 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2007

Jennings v. … Williamson v.

Pennington v. State

66 O.B.A.J. 36 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1995

See Long v. State, 883 P.2d 167, 172 (Okl.Cr.1994). Furthermore, the law does not require an explicit statement of waiver to support a finding of waiver. Browning v. State, 648 P.2d 1261, 1267 (Okl.Cr.1982). … Chaney v.

Wilson v. State

50 Okla. Crim. 69 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 7, 1931

The proof shows that it was not a store, shop, boarding house, or place of business other than a manufacturing plant, and, as stated in the testimony, it was along the right of way of the Rock Island and Sante Fe railroads … Webb v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 890 , 211 Pac. 524 ; Jones v. State, 23 Okla. Cr. 9 , 211 Pac. 1075 . There are other errors assigned, but the view we take of this record it is not necessary to consider them.

SHEPARD v. STATE

2023 OK CR 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2023

Brown v. State , , ¶ 11, , 580; Glossip v. State , , ¶ 96, , 159. We find no error, plain or otherwise, from the challenged argument. … Brown , , ¶ 11, 177 P.3d at 580; Glossip , , ¶ 96, 157 P.3d at 159. There was no plain error as the trial court's admonition cured any possible error. See Vanscoy v. State , , ¶ 20, , 830.

Humphreys v. State

68 O.B.A.J. 3534 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1997

Brown, Capital Direct Appeals Div., Okla. Indigent Defense System, Norman, for appellant on appeal. W.A. … See also Wade v.

Myers v. State

71 O.B.A.J. 3246 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 8, 2000

Plantz v. … Holt v. State, 1981 OK CR 58, ¶36 , 628 P.2d 1170, 1171 ; Glidewell v. State, 1981 OK CR 39, ¶4 , 626 P.2d 1351, 1353 ; Brown v.

Lansdale v. State

45 Okla. Crim. 123 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 2, 1929

In Lockhart v. State, 10 Okla. … In Lockhart v.

Byers v. Territory

1 Okla. Crim. 677 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 15, 1909

He was the manager of Pierce’s ranch; and the deceased,- his wife, and three small children were living on the premises, the appellant boarding with them. According to -his own account, he was having a liaison with Mrs. … Whatever Judge Hurt’s views may have been in ‘his younger *708 days, upon the question of harmless error, the cases of Jinks v. The State, 33 S. W. 868 , and of Shaw v. The State, 39 Tex. Crim.

In Re McNaught

1 Okla. Crim. 528 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 11, 1909

Ed. 882 ; State v. Miller, 43 Neb. 860 , 62 N. W. 238 ; State v. Ayers, 8 S. D. 517, 67 N. W. 611 ; State v. Baldwin, 15 Wash. 15 , 45 Pac. 650 ; State v. Sloan, 65 Wis. 647 , 27 N. W. 616 ; Bird v. … The case of Fuss v.

Johnson v. State

1 Okla. Crim. 321 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1908

Reynolds v. U. S., 98 U. S. 145 , 25 L. Ed. 244 ; State v. Meaker, 54 Vt. 112 ; Scranton v. Stewart, 52 Ind. 68 ; Balbo v. People, 80 N. Y. 484 ; Cox v. People, 80 N. Y. 500; Baldwin v. State, 12 Mo. 223 ; Ortwein v. … Rep. 420 ; People v Welch, 49 Cal. 174 ; State v. Lawrence, 38 Iowa, 51 . In Reynolds v. U. S., supra, Mr.

Knighton v. State

67 O.B.A.J. 131 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jan 8, 1996

Under United States v. … The evidence of Knighton carrying the .22 shells was also discoverable, and it was disclosed to the defense prior to Sheriff Brown’s testimony and was used by the defense to cross-examine him.

Murphy v. State

124 P.3d 1198 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 2005

Thomas v. … Board of County Comm’rs, 1987 OK 6, ¶ 6 , 733 P.2d 878, 879 (finding similar language in Cherokee Allotment Act means allottees “take their title to these lands subject to this ability to establish roads”); Oldfield v.

Wood v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 1030 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 11, 1998

She observed only one inmate, a white male with brown hair and a mustache, about 6 feet, run down the stairs and out of “3-pod.” … In Ross v.

Powell v. State

906 P.2d 765 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 15, 1995

There is no evidence in the record that Powell was forced to keep an unacceptable juror after he had exercised all of his peremptory challenges. 5 Id.; Tibbs v. State, 819 P.2d 1372, 1379 (Okl.Cr.1991); Brown v. … In Diaz v.