Case law

Lamb v. State

293 P.2d 624 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1956

She took the two boys to a boarding home while Mrs. Dozier took *627 Cathy and the hahy to Dr. Robert Shuttee, a baby specialist, for physicial examinations. As to the little girl, Cathy, Dr. … As said by Judge Armstrong in the early days of this court in Owens v.

Cuesta-Rodriguez v. State

241 P.3d 214 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 12, 2010

Carlos Cuesta has a long, stable work history with Forest Lumber and Dan Fioroni, Chairman of the Board. From 1992 until 2002 he was a respected, valued employee of Forest Lumber. … See Browning v.

Turner v. State

4 Okla. Crim. 164 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 21, 1910

In Holt v. … In Cotton v.

McDonald v. State

553 P.2d 171 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 30, 1976

In Brady v. … The defendant asserts the testimony was not corroborated and the motion for defendant’s directed verdict should have been granted, citing Billey v. State, Okl.Cr., 381 *186 P.2d 160 (1963). Also see, Brown v.

Harjo v. State

882 P.2d 1067 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 9, 1994

See, 21 O.S.1981, § 711; see also, Brown v. State, 777 P.2d 1355 (Okl.Cr.1989). Under these facts, the trial court properly did not instruct on First Degree Manslaughter. … Hayes v. State, 845 P.2d 890 (Okl.Cr.1992); Williamson v.

SHEPARD v. STATE

2023 OK CR 15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 21, 2023

Brown v. State , 2008 OK CR 3, ¶ 11 , 177 P.3d 577, 580 ; Glossip v. State , 2007 OK CR 12, ¶ 96 , 157 P.3d 143, 159 . We find no error, plain or otherwise, from the challenged argument. … STATE Discussed at Length 2007 OK CR 23 , 164 P.3d 176 , ANDREW v. STATE Discussed at Length 2008 OK CR 3 , 177 P.3d 577 , BROWN v. STATE Discussed at Length 2010 OK CR 15 , 237 P.3d 792 , STATE v.

Waldrep v. State

74 Okla. Crim. 438 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1942

In Lumpkin v. State, 5 Okla. … In Campbell v. State, 42 Okla.

STATE v. NELSON

2015 OK CR 10 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 2015

V. … Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 484-85, 83 S.Ct. 407, 415-16, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). Yet, in keeping with Brown v. Illinois , 422 U.S. 590, 603, 95 S. Ct. 2254, 2261, 45 L.

State Ex Rel. Cobb v. Mills

82 Okla. Crim. 155 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1945

In McKittrick v. Brown, 337 Mo. 281 , 85 S. … In the case of Grafton v.

Young v. State

69 O.B.A.J. 3903 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 6, 1998

Walker v. … Harjo v.

Taylor v. State

248 P.3d 362 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 16, 2011

Beavers v. … Browning v. State, 2006 OK CR 8, ¶ 43 , 134 P.3d 816, 841 . The prosecutor's statement to the jury in this instance merely pointed out that the eyewitness had consistently identified the Appellant as the shooter.

STEWART v. STATE

442 P.3d 158 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 16, 2019

Long v. … [Texas v.] Brown, 460 U.S. [730] at 742, 103 S.Ct. [1535] at 1543, [ 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983)]; Bland v. State, 2000 OK CR 11, ¶ 45 , 4 P.3d 702, 717 .

Bush v. State

280 P.3d 337 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 19, 2012

In Browning v. … Lott v.

KNAPPER v. STATE

473 P.3d 1053 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 20, 2020

North Carolina v. Pearce , 395 U.S. 711, 717 (1969) (footnotes omitted). Brown v. Ohio , 432 U.S. 161, 165 (1977). … Brown , 432 U.S. at 165 (internal citations omitted). ¶92 The elements of the Count 3 gang-related offense alleged here include all the elements of first degree murder. 14 The Legislature, however, has explicitly authorized

Smith v. State

68 O.B.A.J. 112 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 6, 1996

In Moran v. … State, 774, P.2d 476, 478 (Okl.Cr.1989); Lamb v. State, 767 P.2d 887, 890 (Okl.Cr.1988); Brown v. State, 753 P.2d 908, 911 (Okl.Cr.1988).

Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. State

95 Okla. Crim. 193 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1952

Cited as supporting this statement is Wittenberg v. Board of Liquor Control, Ohio App., 80 N. E. 2d 711 -717. In the case of East Texas Oil Refining Co. v. Mabee Consolidated Corp., Tex. Civ. App., 1937, 103 S. … Martin v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 248 , 250 P. 552 ; Sweat v. State, 69 Okla. Cr. 229 , 101 P. 2d 648 ; Barfield v. State, 71 Okla. Cr. 195 , 110 P. 2d 316 ; Sparkman v. State, 67 Okla.

Hain v. State

67 O.B.A.J. 1977 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1996

Brown v. State, 871 P.2d 56, 61 (Okl.Cr.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 517 , 130 L.Ed.2d 423 (1994). We review only for plain error and find none. … Stanford v.

Haithcock v. State

63 Okla. Crim. 276 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1937

Choate v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 314 , 258 Pac. 360 ; Clemmer v. State, 56 Okla. Cr. 354 , 40 Pac. 2d 37 ; Holford v. State, 57 Okla. Cr. 431 , 48 Pac. 2d 1082 ; A. G. Goodnight v. State, 62 Okla. … Cr. 382 , 71 Pac. 2d 789 ; John Coppage v. State, 62 Okla. Cr. 325 , 71 Pac. 2d 509 ; and John Williams v. State, 63 Okla. Cr. 234 , 74 Pac. 2d 632 .

Sanchez v. State

223 P.3d 980 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 2009

Frederick v. State, 2001 OK CR 34, 1150 , 87 P.8d 908, 946, citing Brown v. State, 1981 OK CR 464 , 59 Okla.Crim. 807 , 4 P.2d 129, 180 (Syllabus). … Browning v. State, 2006 OK CR 8 , T 14, 184 P.3d 816, 880 . The right to effective counsel is a means of enforcing the Constitution's guarantee of a fair and impartial trial, meaning a trial with a reliable result.

Wallace v. State

68 O.B.A.J. 1175 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1997

Oklahoma v. … Quoting from Grasso v.